| dc.identifier.citation | Phelps, Pamela C. 2015. “Looking at Children Through a Different Window: Is it possible that they just don’t know?” (www.onegoalsummerconferece.org/2015Handsout/16.pdf), diakses 15 April 2016. He, Chuanjun & Yan, Chunmei. 2011. “Exploring Authenticity of Microteaching in Pre-Service Teacher Education Programmes”. Teaching Education, vol. 22, no. 3, 291-302. Mahmud, Imran, dan Rawshon, Shahriar. 2013. Micro Teaching to Improve Teaching Method: An Analysis on Students’ Perspectives”. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), vol. 1, issue 4, 69-76. Ogeyik, M. C. 2009. “Attitudes of the Student Teachers in English Language T eaching Programs towards Microteaching Technique”. English Language teaching, vol. 2, no. 3, 205-212. Otsupius, IA. 2014. “Micro-Teaching: A Technique for Effective Teaching”. African Research Review. vol. 8 (4), no. 35. 183-197. Undiyaundeye, Florence & Agbama Inakwu, A. 2012. “Micro-Teaching Experiences In A PreService Early Childhood Education Programme”. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education. vol. 1, no. 2, 99-104. Arends, Richard I. 2008. Learning To Teach (Belajar untuk mengajar).Buku 1. Edisi ketujuh.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Arriyani, neny, dan Wismiarti. 2010. Panduan Pendidikan Sentra untuk PAUD. Jakarta: Pustaka Al Falah. Bredekamp, Sue, and Rosegrant, Teresa. Ed. 1995. Reaching Potentials Transforming Early Childhood Curriculum and Assessment, vol. 2. Washington: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. 2015. Pedoman Pengelolaan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Slavin, Robert E. 2008. Psikologi Pendidikan: Teori dan Praktik, jilid 1. Jakarta: Indeks. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. | id_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | Micro Teaching/MT is teaching in small scale; in terms of content, duration and participants. In MT course, students teacher practice their teaching skills. The students teacher of Early Childhood Education Department (ECED) perform their teaching skills in front of their peers on the materials for early childhood. Early childhood learning is through playing. When the children are playing, students teachers are not only delivering the materials, but also display Teacher Behavior Continuum (TBC). The aim of this research is to find out: 1) the sequence of the TBC used, 2) the most frequen question taxonomy used, and 3) the accuracy of TBC seen from the center that is practiced. This is a descriptive research. Subjects studied are 60 student teachers who are the participants of MT course. The data of TBC is obtained through observation. The data is analyzed by using interactive and quantitative analysis. The research result shows that: 1) the consecutive order of TBC is: Question, Visually Looking On, Physic Intervention, Directive Statement, and Non Directive Statement; 2) Taxonomy question often used is factual question; and 3) not all of the students apply the appropriate TBC center that is practiced. | id_ID |
