Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFarizal, Farizal
dc.contributor.authorRachman, Amar
dc.contributor.authorRasyid, Hadi Al
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-17T03:07:38Z
dc.date.available2015-02-17T03:07:38Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.identifier.citationBianco, V; Manca, O.; and Nardini, S. 2009. Electricity consumption forecasting in Italy using linear regression models. Energy, Vol. 34, pp: 1413-1421. Chui, F.; Elkamel, A.; Surit, R.; Croiset, E.; dan Douglas, P.L. 2009. Long-term electricity demand forecasting for power system planning using economic, demographic, and climatic variables. European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 3, pp: 277-304. Geem, Z.W. and W.E. Roper (2009). Energy demand estimation of South Korea using artificial neural network. Energy Policy, Vol. 37, pp.: 4049-4054 Jinke, L.; Huang, S.; and Dianming, G. 2008. Causality relationship between coal consumption and GDP: difference of major OECD and non-OECD countries. Applied Energy, Vol. 85, pp.: 421-429 Kankal, M.; Akpinar, A.; Komurcu, M.I.; and Ozsahin, T.S. 2011. Modeling and forecasting of Turkey’s energy consumption using socio-economic and demographic variables. Applied Energy, Vol. 88, pp.:1927-1939 Mohamed, Z.; and Bodger, P. 2005. Forecasting electricity consumption in New Zealand using economic and demographic variables. Energy, Vol. 30, pp.: 1833-1843. Ozturk, I. and Acaravci, A. 2010. The casual relationship between energy consumption and GDP in Albania, Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania: evidence from ARDL bound testing approach. Applied Energy, Vol. 87, pp.: 1938-1943 Sözen, A. and Arcaklioglu, E. 2007. Prediction of net energy consumption based on economic indicators (GNP and GDP) in Turkey. Energy Policy, Vol. 35, pp.: 4981-4992 Suganti, L.; and Samuel, A.A. 2012. Energi models for demand forecasting-A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energi reviews, Vol. 16, pp.: 1223-1240. Vining, G.G. 1998. Statistical Methods for Engineers. Duxbury Press. Pacific Grove, CA Walpole, R.E.; Myers, R.H.; Myers, S.L.; and Ye, K. 2007. Probability and Statistics for Engineers & Scientists. Pearson Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJen_US
dc.identifier.issn1412-6869
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/5264
dc.description.abstractEnergy consumption forecasting, especially premium, is an integral part of energy management. Premium is a type of energy that receives government subsidy. Unfortunately, premium forecastings being performed have considerable high error resulting difficulties on reaching planned subsidy target and exploding the amount. In this study forecasting was conducted using multilinear regression (MLR) method with ten candidate predictor variables. The result shows that only four variables which are inflation, selling price disparity between pertamanx and premium, economic growth rate, and the number of car, dictate premium consumption. Analsys on the MLR model indicates that the model has a considerable low error with the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 5.18%. The model has been used to predict 2013 primium consumption with 1.05% of error. The model predicted that 2013 premium consumption was 29.56 million kiloliter, while the reality was 29.26 million kiloliter.en_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartaen_US
dc.subjectforecasting modelen_US
dc.subjectenergy consumptionen_US
dc.subjectsubsidized fuelen_US
dc.subjectmultiple linear regressionen_US
dc.titleModel Peramalan Konsumsi Bahan Bakar Jenis Premium di Indonesia dengan Regresi Linier Bergandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record