Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author'Arifati, 'Azmiyatul
dc.contributor.authorNisaa', Ratri Ma'rifatun
dc.contributor.authorTinasar, Azzuhfi Ilan
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-20T04:17:29Z
dc.date.available2017-07-20T04:17:29Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-22
dc.identifier.citationBaskoro, Arif Anang. Pemetaan Risiko Tanah Longsor di Kecamatan Samigaluh Kabupaten Kulon progo.Thesis of Faculty of Engineering of Universitas Gadjah Mada. BPS. 2016. Kulon Progo Dalam Angka. Yogyakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik. dibi.bnpb.go.id/data-bencana/statistic kulonprogokab.go.id Mardianto, Djati, et al. 2016. Kajian Multiancaman Bencana Berdasarkan Pendekatan Bentanglahan di Lokasi Pembangunan Bandara Baru, Kecamatan Temon, Kabupaten Kulonprogo, Yogyakarta. Program Magister Geoinformation for Spatial Planning and Disaster Risk Management. Perka BNPB. Peraturan Kepala Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana Nomor 02 Tahun 2012 (Pedoman Umum Pengkajian Risiko Bencana). Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Widyawati, Ari et al. 2013. Kajian Kerentanan Bencana Tsunami di Pesisir Kabupaten Kulon Progo Propinsi D. I. Yogyakarta. Volume 2, Nomor 2, Tahun 2013, Halaman 103-110.in_ID
dc.identifier.isbn978-602-361-072-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/9007
dc.description.abstractKulonprogo is one of the regency in Yogyakarta Special Region which hazardous and vulnerable. This research aims to map multi-hazard risk in Kulonprogo Regency. Perka BNPB 2/2012 is used as guideline for multihazard risk assessment. Hazard and vulnerability analysis are needed in risk mapping through a semi-quantitative approach, which uses weighting factors and index values. Hazards considered in Kulonprogo Regency are flood, landslide, and tsunami. Parameters to determine landslide and flood hazard potential are slope, rainfall, soil, and land use. While, tsunami hazard potential uses inundation height as its parameter. Multi-hazard map is obtained from overlying hazard maps using GIS tool. Vulnerability index is gained from social, economic, physical, and environmental components which are classified into three classes then deliver it through index 0 - 1. The result is risk index in range of 0.4 to 0.79, which indicates Wates, Kalibawang, and Kokap Sub-District as the highest on multi-hazard risk. Whereas, low risk stands to Lendah and Nanggulan Sub-District.in_ID
dc.language.isoen_USin_ID
dc.publisherMuhammadiyah University Pressin_ID
dc.subjectMulti-hazardin_ID
dc.subjectRisk Assessmentin_ID
dc.subjectGeographic Information Systemin_ID
dc.titleMulti-Hazard Risk Assessment of Kulon Progo Regencyin_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record