• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Proceedings
    • Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Technology and Industrial Application
    • The 1st ICETIA 2014
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Proceedings
    • Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Technology and Industrial Application
    • The 1st ICETIA 2014
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Makassar City Municipal Waste Sector

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    18.pdf (373.1Kb)
    Date
    2014-12-04
    Author
    Rahim, Irwan Ridwan
    Zubair, Achmad
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Makassar city produced 0.38 Mt/year of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) with population number of 1.398 million and waste generation rate 0.74 kg/cap/day. Almost 89% MSW are transported to Tamangapa Landfill as the only landfill in use recently without treatment, although Tamangapa landfill designed as a sanitary landfills in operation still open dumping and unmanaged will become a source of the GHGs emission, mainly the methane emission. This study have developed 3 (three) scenarios of existing conditions (BAU), scenarios were: 1st scenarios called Communal Waste Processing (CWP), this scenario is intended to reduce the volume of waste to be dumped to landfills, 2nd scenarios called Integrated Waste Processing Center (IWPC), developed an integrated waste processing (both organic and inorganic) facility on ward (kecamatan) level and 3rd scenarios called Development Landfill System (DLS), this scenario is actually similar to BAU condition, assumed the on-site landfills (Tamangapa) previously just controlled type developed to a sanitary type that has a mechanical and biological treatment facilities and methane gas processing facilities. Using SWM-GHG Calculator was developed by IFEU Institute that follows the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. The best scenarios regarding mitigation costs were SCR1 (US$ 5.3/ tCO2-eq) followed by SCR2 and SCR3, because total comparison between the costs incurred by results of reduction of GHG emissions on BAU conditions.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11617/4976
    Collections
    • The 1st ICETIA 2014

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    Publikasi IlmiahCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV