Hukumhttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/24382024-03-28T21:12:42Z2024-03-28T21:12:42ZModel Rekonstruksi Tradisi Bernegara dalam Konstitusi Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945Azhari, Aidul FitriciadaSusila, Jakahttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/58522018-03-19T04:02:23Z2013-12-01T00:00:00ZModel Rekonstruksi Tradisi Bernegara dalam Konstitusi Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945
Azhari, Aidul Fitriciada; Susila, Jaka
The research focuses to investigate the ideas of reconstruction of constitutional
tradition among the founding father of Indonesia and its development in practices before and
after the amendment of the Indonesian Constitution. Based on documentary or normative
research, the research finds that there are two pattern of reconstruction of tradition in
Indonesia, which is used as model for reconstruction of tradition in the constitution, namely
the absolute particular and the relative particular. Historically, before the amendment of the
Indonesian Constitution, the reconstruction of tradition was practiced based on absolute
particular model, while after the constitutional amendment tends to reject to reconstruct the
tradition at the national structure but recognize the tradition at local structure. Generally, it
can be concluded that the amendment of the Indonesian Constitution does not have an
obvious pattern of reconstruction of tradition. It contradicts with the original meaning of the
founders that obviously believed tradition as a basic to create a national constitutional system.
Comparatively, Malaysia has been practicing reconstruction of tradition based on
particular relative model by apply the perpatih tradition, which is originated from
Minangkabau tradition. The perpatih tradition is a democratic tradition, which applied in
Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. Based on the perpatih tradition, the Yang di-Pertuan Besar as the
monarch of Negeri Sembilan should be elected by the four of Undangs. The founders of
Malaysia have applied the perpatih tradition in the Malaysian elected monarch system to
choose the Yang di-Pertuan Agong as the monarch of Malaysia for a five-year term. This
point out that Malaysia reconstructs the tradition in national and local structure.
2013-12-01T00:00:00ZHukum Progresif Dan Kearifan Lokal: Telaah Tentang Etika Kepemimpinan Lokal (Jawa) Sebagai Sumber Pengayaan AsasNurhadiantomo, NurhadiantomoYuspin, Wardahhttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/56902018-03-19T04:03:51Z2014-01-01T00:00:00ZHukum Progresif Dan Kearifan Lokal: Telaah Tentang Etika Kepemimpinan Lokal (Jawa) Sebagai Sumber Pengayaan Asas
Nurhadiantomo, Nurhadiantomo; Yuspin, Wardah
2014-01-01T00:00:00ZConcept Of Social Justice In The Indonesian Constitution: A Postcolonial PerspectiveAzhari, Aidul Fitriciadahttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/56672018-03-19T04:02:58Z2014-01-01T00:00:00ZConcept Of Social Justice In The Indonesian Constitution: A Postcolonial Perspective
Azhari, Aidul Fitriciada
The study focuses to compare the ideas, norms, and practices of the reconstruction of
statecraft tradition between Indonesian and Malaysian constitutional legal system.
Conceptually, there are two model of reconstruction of tradition in the constitution, namely
the particular-absolute and the particular-relative. The first emphasizes on the absolute
aspects of genuine tradition, which essentially different from the values of modern state. The
later stresses more on relative aspects of the proper genuine tradition with the values of
modern state. Historically, before the amendment of the Indonesian Constitution, the
reconstruction of tradition was practiced based on particular absolute model, while after the
constitutional amendment tends to reject to reconstruct the tradition at the national structure,
but recognize the traditions at local structure. Generally, it can be concluded that the
amendment of the Indonesian Constitution does not have an obvious pattern of reconstruction
of tradition. It contradicts with the original meaning of the Indonesian founders, who
obviously believed tradition as a basic to create a national constitutional system. Meanwhile,
Malaysia has been practicing reconstruction of tradition based on particular relative model by
applying the perpatih tradition in the Malaysian elected monarch system.
2014-01-01T00:00:00ZParadigma Profetik: Pembaruan Basis Epistemologi Ilmu Hukum di IndonesiaWardiono, Kelikhttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/55632018-03-19T04:03:59Z2014-01-01T00:00:00ZParadigma Profetik: Pembaruan Basis Epistemologi Ilmu Hukum di Indonesia
Wardiono, Kelik
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z