dc.contributor.author | Yulidar, Luthfi | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-19T02:29:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-19T02:29:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Crystal, D. and Varley, R. (1993). Introduction to Language Pathology. 3rd edn. London: Whurr. Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, Volume 25, Issue 3, 349-367. Levinson, S. C, (1983). Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press. Peccai, J. S. (1999). Pragmatics. London: Routledge. Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research, Volume 1, 1612-5681. Culpeper, J. (2010). Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics, Volume 42, 3232-3245. http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/Computer-mediated_communication, April, 1, 2010. http://www.dailymail.co.uk | id_ID |
dc.identifier.issn | 2621-1661 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/11439 | |
dc.description.abstract | Impoliteness strategy is strategy to attack face or identity or right in
communication. Impoliteness involves some kind of conflict between the participants, it
happens when their social status, power, and culture different. Culpeper, is a proponent of
impoliteness who actives doing research, explains the kind of impoliteness. He formulates
impoliteness strategies in 2010, it has five kinds: bald on record impoliteness, positive
impoliteness, negative impoliteness, withhold politeness, and off-record impoliteness.
The research aims to describe the most occur types impoliteness strategies and the
conventional forms of impoliteness used in Dailymail’s comments. This research is
focused on impoliteness strategies. This research investigates impoliteness in comments
written by the readers in Dailymail, published in 2015-2016. The type of research is
descriptive qualitative. The data source of this research is comments of dailymail.co.uk.
In collecting data, writer uses the documents were taken from Dailymail’s comments.
From the collected data, the writer finds 80 data. The research finding shows that bald of
record impoliteness is the most found in the Dailymail’s comments. Then, negative
impoliteness (condescend, ridicule, scorn, and frighten), positive impoliteness (call the
other name, seek disagreement, exclude the other from an activity, and ignore, snub the
other), sarcasm or mock impoliteness, and off-record impoliteness. Whereas, the
conventional forms of impoliteness strategies of this research consists of patronising
behavior, pointed criticism, and insults. | id_ID |
dc.language.iso | en_US | id_ID |
dc.publisher | Seminar Nasional Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (SEMNAS KBSP) IV 2016 | id_ID |
dc.title | A Pragmatic Analysis of Impoliteness Strategies Used in Dailymail's Comments | id_ID |
dc.type | Article | id_ID |