| dc.identifier.citation | Arwati, N. M. S.(2006) Membangun Perumahan Umat. Hindu: Denpasar Covarubias, M. (1972) Island of Bali. Oxford University Press: Oxford. Edi, N. A. M. (2007) Pemanfaatan Ruang Berbasis Kearifan Lokal (Kasus Kelurahan Ubung Kota Denpasar dan desa Tulamben Kabupaten Karangasem Provinsi Bali, Thesis, Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada. Gelebet, I. N. (1991) Tata Ruang Berdasarkan Kebudayaan Tradisional Bali, Makalah Lokakarya University Counsortium of the Environment tanggal 25 Juni 1991, Denpasar: Universitas Udayana. Jiwa, A. (2003) Pempatan Agung dalam Perempatan Agung Menguak Konsepsi Palemahan Ruang dan Waktu Masyarakat Bali, Denpasar: CV Bali Media. Kusnadi (2006) Kearifan Lingkungan dalam Perspektif Hukum. Makalah dalam Serasehan Nasional Kearifan Lingkungan tanggal 27 September 2006,Yogyakarta. Keraf, A. S. (2002) Etika Lingkungan,Kompas. Miles, M., Huberman, A., Michael (1992) Analisis data Kualitatif. Terjemahan oleh Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi, Jakarta:UI Press. Muta’ali, L. (2005) Pengembangan Wilayah dan Penataan ruang di Indonesia:Tinjauan teoritis dan Praktis Bahan Kuliah PPW, Yogyakarta :PPS UGM. Setiawan, B. (1993) Urban growth. Land and Housing Problem in Denpasar, The Local Gouverment Role, Thesis, Canada: Waterloo University. Singarimbun, M. dan Effendi, S. (1995) Metode Penelitian Survei. Cetakan Kedua, Jakarta: LP3ES. Surpha IW. 2004. Eksistensi Desa Adat Bali dengan Diundangkannya UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1979 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah. Upada Sastra: Denpasar. Wesnawa IGA. 2009. Perubahan Penerapan Konsep Tri Hita Karana dalam Lingkungan Permukiman Perdesaan: Kasus Kabupaten Badung Provinsi Bli. Disertasi. Fakultas pascasarjana UGM: Yogyakarta. Worosuprodjo S. 2001, Ekologi Bentanglahan. UGM: Yogyakarta. Yunus HS. 2004. Pendekatan Utama Geografi Acuan Khusus pada Pendekatan Keruangan, Ekologi dan Kompleks Wilayah. Makalah dalam Studium General Jurusan Geografi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Semarang pada tanggal 24 Maret 2004, (Tanpa Penerbit), Yogykarta. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This Research is carried out in urban area and countryside of Buleleng regency, Generally, the aim of this
study is to analyze the dynamic space exploitation based on local wisdom. Particularly. this research aims
to: (1) analyze the difference of applying of local wise aspect in exploiting of regional room of countryside
and lawn of custom society house in urban area and countryside, and factors that cause the difference of
its applying and (2) solution of using custom countryside room and lawn of custom society house in urban
area and countryside based on local wisdom. To reach the target designed research by using survey device,
by using household as analysis unit. Household Sample is determined by proportional sampling random
(145 sample). Data are collected through documentation technique, and interview of questioner. Then
the data analyzed are through technique analyze qualitative. Research result out find differences of local
wisdom applying in exploiting of regional room of countryside and lawn of house, and solution in
exploiting of room base on local wisdom concept as materialization of human being interaction process
with environment. Based on the research result, contribution that can be put forward: (1) contribution of
theory: approach of countryside scale spatial and house made excellence of this research to express the
difference of local wise applying in exploiting of regional room of countryside and lawn of house and (2)
practical contribution: exploiting of room based on local wisdom can survive and sustain to influence
modernize if custom society remains to tie with custom countryside. The concept of Tri Hita Karana as
form of local wisdom form in utilizing adaptive room against change and growth of an era which is
indicated with being compromise on Kahyangan Tiga as a soul of dwelling, territorial area as a village
physical form and people who dwell there. This harmonious relation guarantee harmonious preserving
environment. | en_US |
