Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWidyastuti, Noor Hafida
dc.contributor.authorIsabella, Dara
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-29T03:36:40Z
dc.date.available2021-03-29T03:36:40Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.identifier.issn2615-1588
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/12413
dc.description.abstractPurpose: to determine fracture resistance differences between smooth type fiber reinforced composite post and serrated types. Methodology: the design of research is post test only control group design. The sample were 32 extracted mandibullary premolars treated endodontically crown down method with gutta percha and resin sealer. The tooth after root canal treatment is continued with the preparation of the post using precission drill. The samples divided into two group based: A. smooth type FRC post, B. serrated type FRC post. FracturSamples were loaded to failure with a Universal Testing Machine. Results: there was a fracture resistance difference between smooth type of FRC post and serrated. Fiber reinforced composite type serrated is more resistance to fracture than FRC type smooth.id_ID
dc.language.isootherid_ID
dc.publisherISETH 2020 (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity)id_ID
dc.titleThe Differences Fracture Resistance between Smooth and Serrated Type of Fiber Reinforced Composite Postid_ID
dc.typeArticleid_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record