| dc.identifier.citation | Arikunto,Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta. Azwar, Saifuddin. 1998. Sikap Manusia Dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar. Clark, Paul Alexander. 2007. State Nursing Shortages And Patient Satisfaction. Columbia. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins. Christophora.2000. Manajemen Asuhan Pasien. Jakarta.Universitas Indonesia. Darmono, Suhartono, Tjokorda, Padmomartono. 2007. Naskah Lengkap Diabetes Melitus Ditinjau Dari Berbagai Aspek Penyakit Dalam. Semarang. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.. Djufrie, Asmorejo dkk. 2007. Di Balik Kesulitan Ada Kemudahan. Surakarta. RS.Islam Surakarta. Diredja, Inggiarsih. 1990. Naskah lengkap Kursus Manajemen Keperawatan Rumah Sakit. Jakarta. Ikatan Rumah Sakit Jakarta Metropolitan. Gifford, Blair. 2002. The Relationship Between Hospital Unit Culture and Nurses Quality of Work Life. Journal Of Health Care Management. Colorado USA. Colorado Technical University. Hamid, Achir Yani. 2004. Pengembangan Profesionalisme Keperawatan Maju, Status Quo Atau Mundur. Jakarta. Permapkin. http:inqthc.OxfordJournals.org/cgi/contents/14/6/493#BIB23 diakses pada 14 Juni 2008 Jam 17.00 Keliat, Budi Ana. 2006. Pedoman Sumber Daya Perawat Ruang Model Praktik Keperawatan Profesional RS.Marzuki Mahdi. Surakarta RSJD. Tidak dipublikasikan. Lamsudin, Rusdi. 2003. Pedoman Pelayanan Kesehatan Islami. Naskah Seminar. Surakarta. RSIS. Lawrence,et all.2001. Administrasi Rumah Sakit. Jakarta. EGC. Notoatmodjo, Soekidjo. 2003. Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta. Nurrohmah, Elly. 2001. Asuhan Keperawatan Bermutu di Rumah Sakit. Makalah Seminar. Jakarta. Persi. Nursalam. 2002. Manajemen Keperawatan : Aplikasi Dalam Praktik Keperawatan. Jakarta. Salemba Medika. Poernomo, Bambang. 2003. Norma Hukum Kesehatan Bersifat Lex Spesialis Dan Proporsional Untuk Perlindungan Hukum Medical Providers. Naskah Seminar Nasional. Tidak dupublikasikan. Surakarta Puji, Hokky. 1997. Cara Mudah Belajar Microsoft Excell 97. Dinastindo. Jakarta. Sabarguna, Boy S. 2005. Manajemen Pelayanan Rumah Sakit. Yoyakarta. Konsorsium Rumah Sakit Islam Jateng – DIY. Sadono, Eko. 2006. Naskah Lengkap Pelatihan Manajemen Bangsal Keperawatan. RS.Elisabeth Semarang.Tidak dipublikasikan. Singarimbun, Masri. 1999. Metode Penelitian Survei. Jakarta. LP3ES. Smith, Emmy . 2003. Seminar Nasional Aspek Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Tenaga Medis Dan Pasien Dalam Transaksi Terapeutik. Surakarta. Yayasan Kakak. Sudjana. 1992. Metode Statistika. Bandung. Tarsito. Swanburg. 2000. Manajemen Keperawatan. Jakarta. EGC. Tim Depkes RI. 1994. Standar Asuhan Keperawatan. Jakarta. Dirjen Yanmed. Trisnantoro, Laksono. 2005.Aspek Strategis Dalam Manajemen Rumah Sakit.Yogyakarta. Andi. Waluyo, Herman J. 2002. Pengantar Filsafat Ilmu. Salatiga. Widya Sari Press. Widiyanto, Djoko. 2003. Mengolah Data Statistik dengan SPSS. Surakarta. Lab Komputer Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Wardani, Astuti. 2000. Pengorganisasian Dalam Keperawatan. Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta. Wardhono, Purwanto. 2006. Strategi Pembinaan Staf. Makalah Seminar. RS. Elisabeth. Semarang. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Patient satisfaction is one factor which has big role in hospital services. Nurses as one employees who work in
hospital must work more to establish its satisfaction especially in hospital . In Nursing application area, nurses
are independent to practice each methods of Nursing Professional Delivery. Two method which widely used in
nursing practice especially in Surakarta Islamic Hospital is Functional method and Allocation of patient/nursing
method It was interesting to compare those two method and how those method influence in patient satisfaction.
The Research before in the same hospital has reported that there was no difference between Team Method and
Functional method. Method This Research represent the quantitative comparative research, non experiment.
While research device used cross sectional. The population in this research, all patient who admitted in
Surakarta Islamic Hospital and receive one of two method. Sample counted 60 patients. Analyze the data used
Independent t test.
Conclusion. Results of research shown: (1) Majority of sample were in productive period, educational
background is high school and bachelor stage, and most of them are private worker. (2) There was no difference
in patient satisfaction between two methods (3) Two groups declare that they were satisfaction with those
method while they were admitted. | en_US |
