Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRosyadi, Imron
dc.contributor.authorAchmad, Nur
dc.contributor.authorTriyono
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-28T06:05:10Z
dc.date.available2012-09-28T06:05:10Z
dc.date.issued2010-03
dc.identifier.citationAdiyoga, W. 2000. “Perkembangan Ekspor-Impor dan Ketidakstabilan Penerimaan Ekspor Komoditas Sayuran di Indonesia”. Jurnal Hortikultura. Vol 10 (l): 70-81. Agustian, A., Zulham, A., Syahyuti, Tarigan, H., Supriatna, A., Supriyatna, Y., Nurasa, T. 2005. “Analisis Berbagai Bentuk Kelembagaan Pemasaran dan Dampaknya terhadap Peningkatan Usaha Komoditas Pertanian”. Laporan Akhir Penelitian. PSEKP-Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Jakarta: Departemen Pertanian Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. 1993. “A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis”. Management Science, 39(10), 1261-1264. Banker, R. D., Chames, A, & Cooper, W. W. 1984. “Some Models for Estimating Tech-nical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envel-opment Analysis”. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092. Budiarto, Joko. Dukungan Teknologi Bagi Pengembangan Hortikultura Tahun 2003. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Bappeda Brebes. 2005. “Produk Unggulan Pertanian Di Kabupaten Brebes”. www.brebeskab.go.id . BPS Brebes. 2008. Kabupaten Brebes Dalam Angka Tahun 2008. Brebes: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Brebes. Bhat, R., Bharat, B., dan Elan Reuben. 1998. Methodology Note: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). India: IIM Ahmedabad. Bowlin, WF. 1996. “Measuring Performance: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)”. Journal of Cost Analysis, 3-7. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Kaoru Tone. 2002. Data Envelopment Analysis: a Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications. References and DEA-Solver Software, 3rd ed., Boston: Kluwer Academic Daft, L.D. 2007. Manajemen. Jilid 1, Edisi 6: Terjemahan, Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Griffin R.W. 2004. Manajemen. Jilid 1, Edisi 7: Terjemahan, Jakarta: Erlangga. Gonarsyah, Isang. 1992. “Peranan pasar Induk Kramat Jati sebagai barometer harga sayur mayur di wilayah DKI Jakarta”. Mimbar Sosek, Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor. (5):43- 48. Hadi, P.U., H. Mayrowani, Supriyati dan Sumedi. 2000. Review and Outlook Pengembangan Komoditas Hortikultura. Seminar Nasional Perspektif Pembangunan Pertanian dan Kehutanan Tahun 2001 ke Depan. Bogor Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Irawan, B., Simatupang P, Sugiarto, Supadi, Agustin, NK., Sinuraya, JF. 2006. “Panel Petani Nasional (PATANAS): Analisis Indikator Pembangunan Pertanian dan Pedesaan”. Laporan Akhir Penelitian. PSEKP-Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Jakarta: Departemen Pertanian. Kuma’at, R. 1992. “Sistem pemasaran sayuran dataran tinggi di provinsi Sulawesi Utara”. Thesis MS - FPS IPB, Bogor. Mubyarto. 1989. Pengantar Ekonomi Pertanian. Jakarta: LP3ES. Rachman, H.P.S. 1997. “Aspek permintaan, penawaran dan tataniaga hortikultura di Indonesia”. Forum Agro Ekonomi 15 (1 dan 2) : 44-56. Laporan Akhir Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Bogor. Nopirin. 1997. Pengantar IImu Ekonomi Makro dan Mikro. Yogyakarta: BPFE-UGM. Nurasa, T., dan Darwis, V. 2007. Analisis Usahatani dan Keragaan Marjin Pemasaran Bawang Merah di Kabupaten Brebes”. Jurnal Akta Agrosia, Vol. 10 No.1 h. 40-48. Saptana, Indraningsih, K.C. dan Hastuti, E.L. 2006. Analisis Kelembagaan Kemitraan Usaha di Sentra-Sentra Produksi Sayuran. Bogor: Pusat Analisis Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian. SudaryantoT., Y. Yusdja, A. Purwoto, K.M. Noekman, A.Bwariyadi, dan W.H. Limbang. 1993. “Agribisnis Komoditas Hortikultura”. Laporan Akhir Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial. Talluri, S. 2000. “Data Envelopment Analysis: Models and Extensions”. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing System. Thamrin, M., Ramlan, Armiati, Ruchjaningsih dan Wahdania. 2003. “Pengkajian Sistem Usahatani Bawang Merah Di Sulawesi Selatan”. Jurnal Pengkajian dan Pemgembangan Teknologi Pertanian Vol. 6, No. 2: 141-153en_US
dc.identifier.issn1410-9344
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/2051
dc.description.abstractOnion Agriculture has benefited farmers, but the benefits are very small as compared with production costs that have been published. This is consistent with the results of research Rosyadi (2009) which states that the level of profit is not sufficient to meet the needs of peasant household economy. Or in other words, onion farm in the location of the study did not provide significant benefits for the economy of peasant households. To solve the problems encountered, partner activities and implementation team agreed that this method is appropriate is the format of training and consultancy services “Implementation of Working Capital Management At the Onion Farm.” Indicators of success of this activity can be seen from some important things that are revealed through in-depth interview participants. Based on in-depth interview is known that onion farmers to understand the importance of working capital management and practice how to manage working capital well, efficiently and effectively. IbM event has implications for government policy for the district soon realized: (a) the availability of new varieties that productive, adaptive and resistant to pests or diseases, (b) availability of production technology and management of quality seeds, the concept of quality assurance and standardization as the first step to build a national seed industry a strong and independent, (c) Availability of environmentally friendly agricultural technologies and efficient by utilizing local resources in an optimal and sustained to produce horticultural products are the opportunities and open to the emergence of a modern and efficient industrial facilities in various regions, (d ) The availability of pest or disease control technology based on the use of natural enemies and reducing synthetic pesticides as low as possible, (e) The availability of postharvest technology for efficient packaging, conservation of fresh quality, product diversification is associated with increased value-added horticultural industry. So the activity is generally considered a success based on in-depth interviews that reveal some things about: (i) working capital management with a good, efficient and effective, (ii) pass the cost efficiency of production, (iii) allocating cash and stock in order to maintain the sustainability of agricultural onion, ( iv) understand and can do proper financial planning and benefits of capital budgeting and (v) increase the working capital of onion farming.en_US
dc.publisherlppmumsen_US
dc.subjectpengelolaan modal kerjaen_US
dc.subjectefisiensien_US
dc.subjectprofitabilitasen_US
dc.titleMENINGKATKAN EFISIENSI DAN PROFITABILITAS PADA USAHA TANI BAWANG MERAH DI KABUPATEN BREBESen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record