| dc.identifier.citation | Adiyoga, W. 2000. “Perkembangan Ekspor-Impor dan Ketidakstabilan Penerimaan Ekspor Komoditas Sayuran di Indonesia”. Jurnal Hortikultura. Vol 10 (l): 70-81. Agustian, A., Zulham, A., Syahyuti, Tarigan, H., Supriatna, A., Supriyatna, Y., Nurasa, T. 2005. “Analisis Berbagai Bentuk Kelembagaan Pemasaran dan Dampaknya terhadap Peningkatan Usaha Komoditas Pertanian”. Laporan Akhir Penelitian. PSEKP-Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Jakarta: Departemen Pertanian Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. 1993. “A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis”. Management Science, 39(10), 1261-1264. Banker, R. D., Chames, A, & Cooper, W. W. 1984. “Some Models for Estimating Tech-nical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envel-opment Analysis”. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092. Budiarto, Joko. Dukungan Teknologi Bagi Pengembangan Hortikultura Tahun 2003. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Bappeda Brebes. 2005. “Produk Unggulan Pertanian Di Kabupaten Brebes”. www.brebeskab.go.id . BPS Brebes. 2008. Kabupaten Brebes Dalam Angka Tahun 2008. Brebes: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Brebes. Bhat, R., Bharat, B., dan Elan Reuben. 1998. Methodology Note: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). India: IIM Ahmedabad. Bowlin, WF. 1996. “Measuring Performance: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)”. Journal of Cost Analysis, 3-7. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Kaoru Tone. 2002. Data Envelopment Analysis: a Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications. References and DEA-Solver Software, 3rd ed., Boston: Kluwer Academic Daft, L.D. 2007. Manajemen. Jilid 1, Edisi 6: Terjemahan, Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Griffin R.W. 2004. Manajemen. Jilid 1, Edisi 7: Terjemahan, Jakarta: Erlangga. Gonarsyah, Isang. 1992. “Peranan pasar Induk Kramat Jati sebagai barometer harga sayur mayur di wilayah DKI Jakarta”. Mimbar Sosek, Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor. (5):43- 48. Hadi, P.U., H. Mayrowani, Supriyati dan Sumedi. 2000. Review and Outlook Pengembangan Komoditas Hortikultura. Seminar Nasional Perspektif Pembangunan Pertanian dan Kehutanan Tahun 2001 ke Depan. Bogor Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Irawan, B., Simatupang P, Sugiarto, Supadi, Agustin, NK., Sinuraya, JF. 2006. “Panel Petani Nasional (PATANAS): Analisis Indikator Pembangunan Pertanian dan Pedesaan”. Laporan Akhir Penelitian. PSEKP-Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Jakarta: Departemen Pertanian. Kuma’at, R. 1992. “Sistem pemasaran sayuran dataran tinggi di provinsi Sulawesi Utara”. Thesis MS - FPS IPB, Bogor. Mubyarto. 1989. Pengantar Ekonomi Pertanian. Jakarta: LP3ES. Rachman, H.P.S. 1997. “Aspek permintaan, penawaran dan tataniaga hortikultura di Indonesia”. Forum Agro Ekonomi 15 (1 dan 2) : 44-56. Laporan Akhir Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Bogor. Nopirin. 1997. Pengantar IImu Ekonomi Makro dan Mikro. Yogyakarta: BPFE-UGM. Nurasa, T., dan Darwis, V. 2007. Analisis Usahatani dan Keragaan Marjin Pemasaran Bawang Merah di Kabupaten Brebes”. Jurnal Akta Agrosia, Vol. 10 No.1 h. 40-48. Saptana, Indraningsih, K.C. dan Hastuti, E.L. 2006. Analisis Kelembagaan Kemitraan Usaha di Sentra-Sentra Produksi Sayuran. Bogor: Pusat Analisis Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian. SudaryantoT., Y. Yusdja, A. Purwoto, K.M. Noekman, A.Bwariyadi, dan W.H. Limbang. 1993. “Agribisnis Komoditas Hortikultura”. Laporan Akhir Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial. Talluri, S. 2000. “Data Envelopment Analysis: Models and Extensions”. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing System. Thamrin, M., Ramlan, Armiati, Ruchjaningsih dan Wahdania. 2003. “Pengkajian Sistem Usahatani Bawang Merah Di Sulawesi Selatan”. Jurnal Pengkajian dan Pemgembangan Teknologi Pertanian Vol. 6, No. 2: 141-153 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Onion Agriculture has benefited farmers, but the benefits are very small as
compared with production costs that have been published. This is consistent with the
results of research Rosyadi (2009) which states that the level of profit is not sufficient
to meet the needs of peasant household economy. Or in other words, onion farm in
the location of the study did not provide significant benefits for the economy of peasant
households. To solve the problems encountered, partner activities and implementation
team agreed that this method is appropriate is the format of training and consultancy
services “Implementation of Working Capital Management At the Onion Farm.”
Indicators of success of this activity can be seen from some important things that are
revealed through in-depth interview participants. Based on in-depth interview is known
that onion farmers to understand the importance of working capital management and
practice how to manage working capital well, efficiently and effectively. IbM event
has implications for government policy for the district soon realized: (a) the availability
of new varieties that productive, adaptive and resistant to pests or diseases, (b)
availability of production technology and management of quality seeds, the concept
of quality assurance and standardization as the first step to build a national seed
industry a strong and independent, (c) Availability of environmentally friendly
agricultural technologies and efficient by utilizing local resources in an optimal and
sustained to produce horticultural products are the opportunities and open to the
emergence of a modern and efficient industrial facilities in various regions, (d ) The
availability of pest or disease control technology based on the use of natural enemies
and reducing synthetic pesticides as low as possible, (e) The availability of postharvest
technology for efficient packaging, conservation of fresh quality, product
diversification is associated with increased value-added horticultural industry. So
the activity is generally considered a success based on in-depth interviews that reveal
some things about: (i) working capital management with a good, efficient and effective,
(ii) pass the cost efficiency of production, (iii) allocating cash and stock in order to
maintain the sustainability of agricultural onion, ( iv) understand and can do proper
financial planning and benefits of capital budgeting and (v) increase the working
capital of onion farming. | en_US |
