| dc.identifier.citation | Agus Dwiyanto. Et.al. 2002. Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta. Ahmad Erani Yustika . 2003 Negara vs Kaum Miskin. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta. ……………………… 2000. Industrialisasi Pinggiran, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta. Anderson, James E. 1979. Public Policy Making. Praeger Publishers. New York. Andi Mallarangeng, dkk. 2000 Otonomi Daerah, Demokrasi dan civil society, Media Grafika, Jakarta Arief Sidharta, 1994. Teori Murni Tentang Hukum”, dalam Lili Rasjidi dan Arief Sidharta, Filsafat Hukum: Mazhab dan Refleksinya, Bandung, Remaja Rosdakarya. Bagir Manan. Prof. DR S.H,M.CL 1990. Hubungan Antara Pusat dan Daerah Berdasarkan Atas Asas Desentralisasi Menurut UUD 1945. Disertasi Doktor. Universitas Pajajaran Bandung. 1990.Bagir Manan, Prof. DR S.H,M.CL, 2002 Menyongsong Fajar Otonomi Daerah, Pusat Studi Hukum UII, Yogyakarta. Baker, Judy. 2000.Evaluating the Poverty Impacts of Projects: A Handbook for Practioners. Directions in Development, Bank Dunia, Washington. DC. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, 2003 Sistem Data dan Penentuan Sasaran (Targeting) dalam Penanggulangan Kemiskinan, Jakarta. ----------------------------, 2003. Informasi Dasar Penyusunan Strategi Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Daerah, Jakarta ----------------------------,2003 DPR,DPD,dan MPR dalam UUD 1945 Baru, UII Press. Yogyakarta. ----------------------------,2003. Informasi Dasar Pengarus Utamaan Penaggulangan Kemiskinan di daerah, Jakarta. Bambang Budi Prasetyo dan Mohammad Ismet, 2003. Peranan pemerintah daerah dalam program ketahanan pangan dan penanggulangan kemiskinan Makalah pada Seminar Nasional : Peran Pemerintah Daerah dalam pelaksanaan RASKIN sebagai upaya mendukung Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin dan Pemantapan Ketahanan Pangan. Bintoro Tjokroamidjojo. 1991. Pengantar Administrasi Pembangunan. LP3ES. Jakarta. Braithwaite, J., C. Grootaert dan B. Milanovic. 2000. Poverty and Social Assistance in Transition Countries. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Campbell, T., G.Petersen dan J. Bazark. 1991. Decentralization to Local Government in LAC: National Strategies and Local Response in Planing, Spending, and Management. LAC Regional Studies Program Report 5. Latin American and the Caribbean Technical Departement, World Bank. Washington, D.C. Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. 2000. Program kebijakan Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia tahun 2000. Jakarta Deputi Koordinasi Bidang Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kesejahteraan Rakyat, Kebijakan Koordinasi Penanggulangan Kemiskinan, http://www.bppt.go.id Didi Ariyadi 2003 Permasalahan Pelaksanaan Program Raskin di Kec. Padang Utara dan Upaya Penanggulangannya, makalah.Dinas Pemberdayaan Keluarga Berencana dan Masyarakat Kab. Sragen, 2004. Rekapitulasi Hasil Pendataan Keluarga Kabupaten Sragen tahun 2003. DPW PKB Jawa Tengah. 2003. Partai untuk Rakyat. Aneka Ilmu. Semarang. Dye, R. Thomas. 1978. Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs. Prentice Hall Inc. New Yersey. Governance for Sustainable Human Development, The United Nations Development Programme. Governance : Sound Development Management, Asian Development Bank, 1995. H. Syaukani.2004.Otonomi Daerah demi Kesejahteraan Rakyat. Nuansa Mandiri, Jakarta. Hetifah SJ Sumarto.2003. Inovasi, Partisipasi, dan Good Governance, 20 prakarsa Inovatif dan partisipatif di Indonesia. Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta. Joko Widodo. 2001. PPS Untag. Good Governance Telaah Dimensi Akuntabilitas dan Kontrol Birokrasi pada Era Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah, Insan Cendekia, Surabaya. Jones, Charles O . 1977. An Introduction to Study of Public Policy. Duxbury Press. Massachustts. Josef Riwu Kaho. 1997. Prospek Otonomi Daerah di Negara Republik Indonesia. Rajawali Press. Jakarta. Journal HAM dan Demokrasi Vol 2 No.2 September 2002, The Habibie Center, Jakarta. Kabul Santosa, 1992. Kemiskinan : Reorientasi strategi dan pengendaliannya. Universitas Jember: Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Kelsen, Hans, 1973 General Theory of Law and State, terjemahan Anders Wedberg, New York, Russell & Russell Kompas 8 November 2001 Koswara Paradigma Baru Otonomi Daerah yang Berorientasi kepada Kepentingan Rakyat dalam Widyapraja tahun XXIV – 2000. Majalah Analisis, tahun XXIII,No.3.Jakarta 2000 Marzuki Nyakman. 1995. Otonomi Daerah Dalam Peluang dan Tantangan. Sinar Harapan. Jakarta. Milovanovic, Dragan. 1994. Sociology of Law. Harrow and Heston. New York. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This research tries to assess of law and regulation aiming to overcome poorness
from national storey; level until area, to do/conduct the synchronization of law and
regulation arrangement to overcome poverty from national storey; level until area
and also to analyze the principle of justice, both for having the character of
constitutive and also regulative which during the time made by the basis of
arrangement to overcome poverty.
This research is executed in Sragen district. Performing this research, writer
uses the descriptive research. Sources of data used primary data that represents a
number of fundamental data taken as especial reference in this research, such as
Indonesian Constitution 1945, Act No.22/1999 about Governance Area, Act
No.7/1996 about food, Act No. 5/1993 about Improvement of to Overcome Poverty,
Presidential Decree No. 124/2001 and secondary data used is other materials that
relevant with the research problems.
In sum, the research concludes that policy conducted by Government of District
Sragen program to overcome poverty during autonomous era are synchronized in
the form of determination expense of committee to overcome poorness , however
many matters which do not synchronous are namely, background forming of
committee to overcome poorness identification, determination domicile the
committee, duty of committee and formation of committee membership that consist
of overcome poorness law having accommodated the ground professionalism,
accountability, controlling, efficient and effective, but not yet accommodated the
knowledge ground to the fore, energy, listening carefully and equivalency. Model of
law and regulation which is used by a governmental policy is medium, if it be seen
from forming side represent the mixture model among policy elite preference and
policy as institutional activity from Thomas R Dye, if it be seen from the in and out of
process represent the mixture among model of ellite mass and model the
institutional from Christopher Ham- Michael Hill. | en_US |
