| dc.identifier.citation | Adina, Bloom Lewkowicz. 2007. Teaching Emotional Intelligence, Strategies and Activities for Helping Student make Effective Choices. California: Corwin Press. Arcaro, S. Jerome. 1995. Quality Education, An Implementation. Florida : St Lucie Press. Bogdan, R. C. dan Taylor, S.J. 1975. Intoduction to Qualitative research Methods. New York : John Wiley. Charles Hoy. and Colin Bayne Jardine. 2000. Improving Quality in Education. London: Falmer Press. Damme, Van, Dirk. 2002. Trend and Models In International Quality Assurance and accreditation in Higher education, In relation to trade in Education Services. Washington D.C. : US Forum on Trade in Educational Services 23-24 May 2002. Darling, L. Hammond. 2005. Preparing Teacher for a Changing world, What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco; Jossey- Bass. Dill, D. D. 2000. Designing academic audit: lessons learned in Europe and Asia. Quality in Higher Education 6 (3). Esterberg, G. Kristin. 2002. Qualitative methods in social research. Toronto : MC Grow Hill. Harsey, Paul. 1988. Management of Organizational Behavior Human Resources. London; Prentice Hall International Inc. Harvey, Lee. and Green, D. 1993. Quality Assurance in Western Europe: Trends, Practices and issues, Bonn : FRG. Hoy, Charles. 2000. Improving Quality in Education. London: Falmer Press. Jackson, N. 1998. Understanding standard based qualitative assurance part 2, nuts and bolts of dearing policy work. Qualitative assurance in education 6 (4). Lazar, Vascanu. 2004. Prepare in Indicator for Institutional and Programme, Accreditation in Higher Education/territory Education. Bucharest: CEPES UNESCO. Lewis, Elton. 1995. Quality Assurance in Teaching. Baston: Longman. Mac, Millan, H. James. 2001. Research in education. Boston: Longman. Majelis Pendidikan tinggi, Penelitian dan Pengembangan. 2002. Direktori Pendidikan tinggi Muhammadiyah. Yogyakarta: Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah Mason, J. 1996. Qualitative researching. London: Sage Publications. Matthew B. Miles. 1984. Qualitative Data Analysis, A Sourcebook of New Methods. New Delhi: Sage Publications. Eko Supriyanto, Model Penjaminan Mutu Pembelajaran…… 13 Middlehurst, Robin. 2001. Quality Assurance Implications of New forms of Higher Education. Helsinki: ENQA. Moch. Anwar. 2002. Pengembangan sistem Penjaminan Mutu Perguruan tinggi Muhammadiyah. Makalah disajikan dalam pertemuan Pimpinan PTM Pembina, Yogyakarta, 27 – 28 April 2002. Olssen, Mark. 2004. Education Policy: Globalization, Citizenship and Democracy. London: Sage Publications. Owens, G. Robert. 1995. Organizational Behavior in Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Patton, Q. Michael. 1980. Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication. Roger, Ellis. 1993. Quality assurance for University Teaching. Bristol: Open University Smith, M. L,. 1987. Publishing qualitative research, American Educational research journal 24 Stainback, Susan. 1988. Understanding and Conducting qualitative research, Lona : Kendall Hung Publishing Company Steve, Garlick. 2004. Benchmarking the University: Learning about improvement, report for the Department of Education Science and Training. Australian Government: Department of Education, Science and Training. Sutopo, H.B. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, dasar teori dan Terapannya dalam penelitian. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press. Thune, Christian. 2001. European Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Helsinki: Multiprint. Tsui, C. Cecelia. 2002. Quality in Higher Education: Policies and Practices; a Hongkong Perspective Introduction and research Approach. Dissertation. Whittington, Dorothy. 1995. Quality Assurance in Health care: The Implications for University Teaching. Bristol, PA. USA. Woodhouse, D. 2001. Globalization: Implications for education and for quality. Paper to the AAIR Conference, Rockhampton ( AU) September 2001. Yin, R. K. 1997. The abridged version of case study research, design and methods. In L. Bickman and D. G. Rog (eds) Handbook of applied social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Most of Muhammadiyah universities in specific region of Yogyakarta have not
implemented yet the quality assurance, exactly it demands both in the society and government
that cannot be avoided . Therefore, this study aims to find a specific model of quality assurance in
the university environment Muhammadiyah as an attempt to answer the demands in this atas.
This research is qualitative research with a target of six colleges in the Muhammadiyah state universities
in specific region of Yogyakarta and Central Java. Those are Muhammadiyah University
of Yogyakarta, University of Ahmad Dahlan, Muhammadiyah University of Magelang, Muhammadiyah
University of Surakarta, Muhammadiyah University of Purworejo and Muhammadiyah
University of Purwokerto. The procedure adopted to find the model of quality assurance through
theoretical studies, collecting data from informants about the aspects that should be subjected to
quality assurance, modeling and verification of quality assurance models. Data collection was
carried out with questionnaire, interviews and documentation. Data analysis was performed with
a description of the data, the analysis of flows (Flow Analysis), and contingency. The results of
this study consist of two models: Model for quality assurance in learning and quality assurance
models for lecturers. The forms of quality assurance is a combination of a standard element of
the quality of academic and ideologies of Muhammadiyah, while the quality assurancer are the
Muhammadiyah Central Leadership, Daily Executive Agency (BPH) and the Directorate General
of Higher Education. The quality assurance models found through networking opinion, in-depth
interviews and document the aspects that should be subject to quality assurance to college Muhammadiyah
Yogyakarta and Central Java. The advantages of the quality model assurance are
efficiency in cost and simple in the tools and mechanism that fit to the character of Muhammadiyah
state universities. The mechanism of the model is done by committed leadership begins, then
formulate the quality standards by the elements of quality assurance later implemented through
institutional self-assessment and faculty independently. The development and ideology of the academic
community is done through the assessment. | en_US |
