dc.identifier.citation | Adjemian, C. 1976. “On the Nature of Interlanguage System.” Language Learning. 26: 297—320. Beebe, Leslie M. (Ed.) 1990. Issues in Second Language Acquisition: Multiple Perspectives. London: Newbury House. Bley-Vroman, Robert. 1990. “What is the Logical Problem of Foreign Language Learning.” In Gass, Susan and Chaudron, Craig. 1990. Second Language Classroom: Research on Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: C.U.P. Corder, S. P. 1982. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. London: Oxford University Press. Corder, S. P. 1992. “A Role for Mother Tongue” In S. Gass and L. Selinker (Eds.) Language Transfer in Language Learning (18—31). Amsterdam: John Benjamin. Crystal, David. 1997. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: C. U. P. Ellis, Rod. 2004. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: C U P. Ellis, Rod. 2006. Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: C U P. Fauziati, Endang. 2008. “The Effects of a Short-Term Error Treatment on the Learners’ Interlanguage Errors: A Case Study of Senior High School Students Learning English as a Foregn Language”. Unpublished Dissertation at School of Applied English Linguistics Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atmajaya Jakarta. Han, Zhaohong. 2004. Fossilization in Adult Second Language Acquisition. Toronto: Multilingual Matters. Han, Zhaohong. 2007. Five Central Issues of Fossilization. Toronto: SLRF Teachers College, Columbia University. Hatch, Evelyn and Farhady, Hossein. 1992. Research Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. London: Newbury House Publishers. Jack C. Richards (Ed.) 1977: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. London: Longman James, Carl. 1998. Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. London: Longman. Jenkins, Jennifer. 2003. World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students. New York: Routledge. Johnson, J.S. and Newport, E.L. 1989. “Critical Period Effects in Second Language Learning: The Influence of Maturational State on the Acquisition of English as a Second Language. Cognitive Psychology 21, 60-99. Krashen, S.D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman. Lenneberg, E.H. 1976. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley. Little Wood. W. 1981. Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mukattash, Lewis. 1987. “Persistence of Fossilization”. IRAL, 24/3: 187—203 Muranoi, Hitoshi. 2000. “Focus on Form through Interaction Enhancement: Integrating Formal Instruction into a Communicative Task in EFL Classrooms.” Language Learning, 50/4: 617—83. Nunan, David. 1992. Research Method in Language Learning. New York: Cambridge U.P. Saville-Troike, Muriel. 2006. Introducing Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P. Schachter. 1990. Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P. 41—67 Brooks, Nelson. 1964. Language and Language Learning and Teaching: Theory and Practice. Chicago: Rand McNally Schachter, Jacquelyn. 1998. “Resent Research in Language in Language Learning Studies: Promise and Problems. Language Learning, 28/4: 557—583. Scovel, T. 1998. “A Critical Review of the Critical Period Research”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 13/1: 1—18. Selinker, Larry. 1977. “Interlanguage.” In Jack C. Richards (Ed.) Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. London: Longman. Selinker, Larry. 1997. Rediscovering Interlanguage. London: Longman. Selinker, Larry and Usha Lakshamanan. 1992. “Language Transfer and Fossilization: The Multiple Effects Principle.” In Gass and Selinker. 1994. 197—216. Sorace, A. 1993. “Incomplete vs. Divergent Representations of Unaccusativity in Non-native Grammars of Italian. Second language Research. 9/1:22—27. Spada, Nina. And Lightbown, P. 1999. “Instruction, L1 Influence and Developmental Readiness in Second Language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83: 1—22. Standard Penilain Buku Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris. 2003. Pusat Perbukuan: DEPDIKNAS Steinberg, Danny D, Hiroshi Nagata and David P. Aline. 2004. Psycholinguistics: Language, Mind and Word. London: Longman Sugiono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R and D. Bandung: Alfabeda Sutopo, H. B. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: dasar Teori dan Terapannya dalam Penelitian. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press. Thep-Ackrapong, T. 1990. Fossilization: A Case Study of Practical and Theoretical Parameters (Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Illinois State University) in Han, ZhaoHong. 2004. Fossilization in Adult Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Learner errors are an inevitable sign of human fallibility; therefore, they always exist in second
language learning. They become the source for studying the system of the learners’ L2 or
interlanguage (IL). As a language system, IL has at least three main characteristics: systematicity,
permeability, and fossilization (Adjemian 1976; Saville-Troike, 2006: 41). That IL is systematic
and permeable is no longer disputable. However, the premise which claims that IL is fossilized is
still debatable. Schachter 1990; Han 2005, etc. view that there is critical period for SLA; adult L2
learners cannot attain complete TL grammar. Their IL errors are fossilized. Meanwhile, the
opposing view comes from White and Genesee 1996, Bialystok 1999, and Steinberg et al. 2004,
believing that there is no critical period for learning syntax. Based on these, the present study
concerned an error fossilization-related issue, with specific focus on grammatical errors.
The data were grammatical errors from the learners’ free compositions collected four
times: prior and after one-semester instruction and two months afterwards. The data were analyzed
qualitatively. The result indicates that almost all of the learners’ grammatical errors could be
eliminated. Further surveillance shows that they were dynamic. At a certain period of learning
course, some grammatical errors appeared. Due to the instruction, they changed their nature—
some were destabilized, some were fluctuating, while others were stabilized. Fluctuating errors
tended to destabilize and the stabilized errors were also likely to destabilize. The conclusion drawn
from this study is that the learners’ grammatical errors are dynamic and not fossilized. They may
get stabilized but just temporarily. The learners can take a lot of benefits from the given instruction
so as to make their grammatical errors can be destabilized. | en_US |