| dc.identifier.citation | Aaker, David. 1989. Managing assets and skills: The key to a sustainable competitive advantage. California Management Review, Winter: 91-106. Adam Smith. 1971 (1776), An Inquairy into The Nature and Causes of the wealth of Nation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Ajitabh Ambastha, K. Momaya. 2002. Competitiveness of Firms: Review of Theory, frameworks, and Models. Singapore Management Review, Volume 26 No. 1, pp 45-61 Alberto Petroni. 2000. The Future of Insurance Industry in Italy: Determinant of Competitiveness in the 2000s. Futures 32 (2000) 417 – 434. Doz, Yves L, Dan C.K. Prahalad. 1987. Multinational Mission. The Free Press, New York. Franke, Richard H., G Hofstede, and M Bond. 1991. Cultural roots of economic performance: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 165-173. Grant, R.M. 1991. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review. 33(3), P.114-135. Grant R.M. 1991. Porter’s Competitive Advantage of Nation: An Assessment. Strategic Management Journal 12 (7): 535-548. Grossman, G.M. dan E. Helpman. 1993. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, Mass.: the MIT Press Hashi, Iraj. Hajdukovic, D and Luci, Erjon. 2005. Can Government Policy Influence Industrial Competitiness: Evidence From Poland and the Cech Republic. Kertas kerja dibentang di end-of-project Conference as a factor of Integration: Indetifiying Challengers of European Market. Brussel November 2005. Heckscher dan Ohlin. 1949. The effect o foreign trade on distribution of income. In Howard. S. Ellis & Lioyd A. Metzle, editors, Reading in the theory on international trade. Homewood Irwin. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Workrelated Values. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.UNDP. 2002. Human Development Report, United Nation, Oxford University Press, NY. Van Dijk. 2000. Beyond the informal elephant : competitiveness of micro and small enterpises in the MENA region. Van Rooyen, C.J. Esterhuizen, D. Haese, L.D’. 2000. Determinant of Competitiveness in The South Africa Agro-Food and Fibre Complex. Agricultural Business Chamber (ABC) and the Agricultural Research Council (ARC), Pretoria. Vernon, Raymond. 1996. International investment nad international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economic. Mei: 190-207. Waheeduzzaman, A.N.M. and Ryans, J.J.Jr. 1996. Definition, Perspectives, and Understanding of International Competitiveness: a Quest for a Common Ground. Competitiveness Review, 6(2), P.7-26. Williams, Jeffrey R. 1992. How sustainable is your competitive advantage? California Management Review (Spring), 29-51. Wiyadi. 2007. Kajian daya saing industri batik di Surakarta sebagai sentra penghasil komoditi unggulan daerah. Laporan Hasil Penelitian P3SWOT. Depdiknas. Jakarta. Wiyadi. 2008. Daya Saing Industri Skel Kecil dan Sederhana di Jawa Tengah Indonesia. Disertasi Program Doktor Falsafah Ekonomi. Fakuti Ekonomi dan Perniagaan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Yip, George S. 1989. Global strategy: In a world of nations. Sloan Management Review, 29-40. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The study aims to establish the determining model industry competitiveness index.
Specifically, the study aims to determine the index status and analyze the industrial
competitiveness from dimensions and industry groups, which previous studies did not do them.
The highly competitiveness industry, if it has more than 200 index. Similarly, the dimension
highly competitiveness, if it has more than 50 index. This study also analyzes the differences of
industrial competitiveness among industries. Research done by direct survey to 399 SMI
which produce core products in the areas of Central Java based on Porter's diamond model.
This study can form model for determining industry competitiveness index (the first year of
research) and develop the model of competitive industries empowerment (the second year of
research). Based on the results of the analysis, the status of industrial competitiveness in the
Central Java have index value amount 262.83. It is highly competitiveness. By the way, the
small industry groups have the index competitiveness more highly compared with medium
industries (264.48 > 261.31). It shows that the small industry groups have more competitive
than the medium industries. So, by used the Independent Sample T test, it shows there is no
difference competitiveness average of small industry groups and medium industries. So the
average of competitiveness index in both groups are same significantly | en_US |
