| dc.identifier.citation | Anonim. 2005. Laporan Akhir Penyusunan Studi Air Bersih Kota Pekanbaru Selatan. Pekanbaru: PT. Duta Consultan Engineering. Anonim. 2006. Feasibility Study Clean Urban Water Supply Project South Pekanbaru. Denmark: Danida. Anonim. 2000. Pekanbaru Water Supply Concession Pre-feasibility Study. Pekanbaru: PT. Multi Karadiguna Jasa. Arifin, H. 1981. Evaluasi Proyek, Pengertian dan Cara Menganalisis. [internet]. http// Evaluasi Proyek- FEUI.html. Choliq, A. et al. 1999. Evaluasi Proyek. Bandung: Pionir Jaya. Ervianto, W. I. 2003. Manajemen Proyek Kontruksi. Yogyakarta: Andi. Fitriani, H. et al. 2006. Kajian Penerapan Model NPV-at-Risk Sebagai Alat Untuk Melakukan Evaluasi Investasi Pada Proyek Jalan Tol, volume (II): [internet]. http// Infrastruktur and built environment/eJournal/itb.pdf. Grant, E. L. 1987. Principles of Engineering Economy. Ronald Press Company. Istijanto. 2006. Riset Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Gramedia PustakaUtama. Kodoatie, R. J. Analisa Ekonomi Teknik. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro. Kesuma, W.P. 2006. Willingness to pay Sebagai Pendekatan Penentuan Tarif Air Bersih (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Air Bersih Kota Pekanbaru Selatan). Tugas Akhir Jurusan Teknik Sipil Program Studi S1. Pekanbaru: Universitas Riau. Kuncoro, M. 2001. Metode Riset Untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Jakarta: Erlangga. Nur, M. 2007. Analisa Pengaruh Komponen-Komponen Penggajian Terhadap Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja Produksi di PT. P & P Bangkinang Crumb Rubber Factory Pekanbaru. Tugas Akhir Jurusan Teknik Industri S1. Pekanbaru: Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau. Perpamsi, 2010, Peta Masalah PDAM, Ringkasan Eksekutif, Edisi Desember, 2010, Persatuan Perusahaan Air Minum Seluruh Indonesia. Prastito, A. 2004. Cara Mudah Mengatasi Masalah Statistik dan Rancangan Percobaan Dengan SPSS 12. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo. Pujawan, I. N. 2004. Ekonomi Teknik. Surabaya: Guna Widya. Rijianto, B. 2000. Laporan Akhir Pekerjaan Studi Kelayakan Air Bersih Dan Detail Engineering Desain Di Kecamatan Siak Hulu Kabupaten Kampar. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung-Lembaga Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. Sandyavitri, A. & Robert, J.Y. 2003. Risk Management in Water Supply, Conference People and Systems for Water, Sanitation and Healt. Lusaka Zambia, 20-24 August 2001. Singarimbun, M & Effendi, S. 1989. Metode Penelitian Survai. Jakarta: LP3ES. Saputra, A. 2006. Analisa Kelayakan Investasi Pembangunan Sistem Penyediaan Air Bersih Di Pekanbaru Selatan. Tugas Akhir Jurusan Teknik Sipil Program Studi S1. Pekanbaru: Universitas Riau. Soeharto, I. 1995. Menejemen Proyek Dari Konseptual Sampai Operasional. Jakarta: Erlangga. Sulaiman, Wahid. 2004. Analisis Regresi Menggunakan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi. Suyanto, A. et al. 2001. Ekonomi Teknik Proyek Sumberdaya Air. Jakarta: MHI. Usman, H. 1995. Pengantar Statistik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Wiguna, T. 2005. Analisa Kelayakan Proyek Private Sector PDAM Pekanbaru dengan Metode Willingnes To Pay. Tugas Akhir Jurusan Teknik Sipil Program Studi S1. Pekanbaru: Universitas Riau. Zainuri. 2004. Perbandingan Kelayakan Investasi IPA Antara Sumber Air Dari Sungai Siak Dengan Sungai Kampar Pada PDAM Pekanbaru. Tesis Program Studi Megister Teknik Sipil. Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia. ___________Inflasi (Indeks Harga Konsumen) [online]. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia. Available at: <URL: http:// Inflasi CPI - Bank Sentral Republik Indonesia.html> [Accessed 21 Desember 2008]. ___________BI Rate Dan Kurs Uang Kertas Asing [online]. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia. Available at: <URL: http://www.bi.go.id/biweb/Templates/Dynamic> [Accessed 16 Februari 2008]. ___________Biro Pusat Statistik. Pekanbaru Dalam Angka 2007. Pekanbaru. ___________Permenkes No: 907 tahun 2002 tentang Syarat-Syarat dan Pengawasan Kualitas Air Minum. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | n 2011, an existing water supply service in Pekanbaru City, Riau Province was limited to cover 8%
of 900.000 populations mainly located at the City Central area. However, in 2006 an extension of
the water supply scheme for southern part of the city was initiated but the progress was slow as
uncertainty of financial resources. It was estimated the capital investment required to produce and to
supply a 500 liter/second of clean water covering 40.000 house connections was Rp 459.3 Billion.
Initially it was planned to procure this investment from the soft loan obtained from Government to
Government resources (G to G as much as 80%), APBN (7%) and APBD (13%). This study
investigated various sensitive factors affecting project feasibility. After conducting numerous
simulations, this study identified 5 significant factors affecting economic parameters of the project;
(i) fluctuation of inflation rates, (ii) efficiency in collecting revenues, (iii) water tariffs, (iv) water
demand, and (v) un-accounted for water. It was identified that the BEP of the project is relatively
long (23 years, near the project lifecycle of 24 years), BCR was 1.02, and IRR 8.86% (relatively
low). Hence, it is recommend that, to take any necessary precautions to control and mitigate these 5
sensitive factors to ensure achieving project objectives. | en_US |
