Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuyatmini
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-22T08:51:50Z
dc.date.available2013-06-22T08:51:50Z
dc.date.issued2012-06
dc.identifier.citationAmiruddin. (2003). Hubungan Keputusan Pendanaan, Peluang Pertumbuhan Dan Struktur Kepemilikan: Suatu Perspektif Keagenan, Majalah Ekonomi , Th.VIII,No. 1 .Bathala,C.T., K.R. Moon., dan R.P. Rao. (1994). “Managerial Ownership, Debt Policy, and The Impact of Institutional Holdings; and Agency Perspektive”, Financial Management 23, 38-50. Brigham,E. F. dan L. C. Gapenski. (1996). Intermediate Financial Management, Fifth Edition, New York: The Dryden press. Brigham, E. F.dan L.C.Gapenski, Daves, PR. (1999). Intermediate Financial Management, Sixth Edition.New York: The Dryden Press. Brigham E.F. dan Daves P. R.. (2004). Intermediate Financial Management, Eighth Edition, South western. Chen, R.Carl, dan Steiner T. (1999). Managerial Ownership and Agency Conflict: A Non Linear Simultaneous Equation Analysis of Managerial Ownership, Risk Taking, Debt Policy, and Dividend Policy”, Financial Review, vol. 34, 119-137. Coffee, J.C., JR. (1991). “Liquidity Versus Control: The Institutional Investor as Corporate Monitor”. Columbia Law Review, October, 1277-1368. Cooper.D.R. dan Schindler,P.S. (2003). Business Research Methods, Eighth Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill. Cooper.D.R. dan Emory. C. W. (1995). Bisiness Research Methods, Fourth Edition. Homewood. IL: Irwin. Crutchley, C. E dan R. S. Hansen. (1989). A Test of the Agency Theory of the Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage, and Corporate Dividends, Financial Management Winter, 36-46. Crutchley, C.E., M.R.H. Jensen., J.S. Jahera. Jr., dan J.E. Raymond (1999).” Agency Problems and The Simultaneity Decision Making The Role of Institusional Ownership”, International Reviw of Financial Analysis, 8:2. Denis, David J., dan Atulya S.. (1999). Agency Theory and The Influence of Equity Ownership Structure on Corporate Diversification Strategis, Strategic Management Journal 20, 10711076. Fama, E.(1980). “Agency Problem and The Theory of The Firm”, Journal of Political Ecomomy 88, 288-325. Fama, E., dan M. Jensen. (1983). “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Ecomomic 26, 301-325. Friend, I.dan L. Lang. (1988). “An Empirical Test of The Impact of Managerial Self-interest on Corporate Capital Structure”, Journal of Finance 43, 271-281. Ghozali, I. (2006). Analisis Multivariate Lanjutan Dengan Program SPSS, Semarang: Badan Penerbit: Universitas Diponegoro. Grossman, S. dan 0. Hart. (1982). Corporate Financial Structure and Managerial Incentives, in John McCall, ed., The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL). Gujarati, D.N.(2003). Basic Econometrics. Fourth Edition New York:McGrow-Hill. International Editions. Heckert J. B., Willson J. D. dan Campbell J. B.(1996). Controllership Tugas Akuntan Manajemen, Edisi Ketiga, Jakarta : Erlangga. .Jensen, M. (1986). “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers”, American Economic Review 76, 323-329. Jensen, M. dan W. Meckling. (1976). “Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360 Jensen, G., D. Solbeng., dan T. Zorn. (1992). “Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27, 247-263. Mahrt, J.dan Smith. (2005).The Interaction of Capital Structure and Ownership Structure.” http://proquest.umi.com. Mehran, H. (1992). “Executive Incentive Plans, Corporate Control, and Capital Structure”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27, 539-560. Moh’d, M.A., L.G.Perry., dan J.N. Rimbey. (1998). “ The Impact of Ownership Structure on Corporate Debt Policy: A Time-Series Cross-Sectional Analysis”, Financial Review, August,Vol.33, 85-99. Nguyen, T. D. K., dan Ramachandran. N. (2006). “ Capital Structure in Small and MediumSized Enterprises The Case of Vietnam”. http://proquest.umi.com. .Saunders, A., EStrock., and N.G. Travlos. (1990). “Ownership Structure, Deregulation and Bank Risk Taking”, Journal of Finance, 45, No.2. .Shleifer, A., dan R. Vishny. (1986). “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control”, Journal of Political Economics 95, June, 461-488en_US
dc.identifier.issn1412-3835
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/3130
dc.description.abstractThe aims of the research are: (1) to analyze effects of stock ownership structure by insider ownership and institutional investor on debt policy and dividend policy at the public companies in Indonesia, (2) to obtain empirical evidences that control mechanism through stock ownership by the insider ownership and the institutional investor will decrease the problems of agency, which then minimizes the cost of agency.The samples of the research which included 66 manufacturing companies registered at the Jakarta Stock Exchange. The samples were taken by using a purposive sampling technique.The hypotheses were then tested by means of a simultaneous analysis of Two Stage Least Square.The results of the research show that (1) the insider ownership has a significant effect on the debt policy and, there is a substitutional or negative causal relation between the insider ownership and debt policy; (2) he institutional investor does not have a significant effect on the debt policy, and there is not any substitutional relation between the institutional investor and the debt policy, but the institutional investor has a negative effect on the insider ownershipen_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartaen_US
dc.subjectownership structureen_US
dc.subjecttheory of agencyen_US
dc.subjectcost of agencyen_US
dc.subjectdebt policyen_US
dc.titleAnalisis Dampak Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Kebijakan Finansial dalam Perspektif Teori Keagenanen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record