| dc.identifier.citation | Adkins dan Russell. 2004. Supervisor-Subordinate Work Value Congruence and Subordinate Performance: A Pilot Study . Journal of Business and Psychology. Volume 12, Number 2 / December, 1997. Aqib dan Rohmanto. 2007. Profesionalisme Guru dan Pengawas Sekolah. Bandung: Yrama Widya. Arikunto, Suharsini. 2004. Dasar-dasar Supervisi. Jakarta: Rineke Cipta. Boulle. 2010. Data Grid Models for Preparation and Modeling in Supervised Learning. Journal of Method of learning. Vol 3 No 5. Pg: 1-35 Duggan, Smith and Thomsen. 2009 A monitoring and evaluation framework for transformative change from sustainability programs in secondary schools” mengatakan “In this paper, the authors being to develop a monitoring and evaluation framework towards informing transformative change programs, developing effective education for sustainability initiatives, and predicting their potential for success or lack there of. Journal of Regional Sustainability Research Group. Vo. 3 No 5. Pg: 1-16. Hamalik, O. 2006. Pendidikan Guru : Berdasarkan pendekatan Kompetensi. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara. Harsono. 2008. Etnografi Pendidikan sebegai Desain Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press. Hartoyo. 2006. Supervisi Pendidikan. Semarang : Pelita Insani. Haryanto. 2009. Pembelajaran Multimedia di Sekolah. Jakarta: PT. Prestasi Pustakarya. Herabudin. 2009. Administrasi dan Supervisi pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia. Hesty. 2008. Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Tematik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Dasar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Diakses tanggal 11 Juni 2010. Isjoni. 2006. Membangun Visi Bersama : Aspek-Aspek Penting dalam Reformasi Pendidikan. Jakarta :Yayasan Obor Indonesia. McPherson, R.B., Crowson, R.L., & Pitner, N.J. 1986. Managing Uncertainty: Administrative Theory and Practice in Education. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Pub. Co.Miles & Huberman. 2007. Qualitative Research. Jakarta: Indeks. Moleong, L.J. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Remaja Rasda Karya. Monday T. Joshua, Akon M. Joshua dan William Allan Kritsonis. 2006. “Use of Student Achievement Scores as Basis For Assessing Teachers’ Instructional Effectiveness. Journal International. Muaddab, Hafis. 2010. Fungsi dan Peran Media Dalam Pembelakaran, http// www.Fungsi-dan-peran-media-dalam-pembelajaran, diacces hari Kamis, 25 November 2010, jam 14.30 Mulyasa. 2010. Menjadi Guru Profesional (Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan). Bandung Rosda. Cetakan kesembilan. Muslim. 2009. Supervisi Pendidikan Meningkatkan Kualitas Profesionalisme Guru. Bandung: Alfabeta. Pidarta, M. 2009. Supervisi Pendidikan Kontekstual. Bandung: Rineka Cipta. Purwanto N. 2006. Administrasi dan Supervisi pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Rizali Ahmad et al. 2009. Dari Guru Konvensional menuju Guru Profesional. Jakarta: Grasindo. Steiner dan Kowal. 2007 yang berjudul “Principal as instructional leader Designing a Coaching Program That Fits” menyatakan “There is broad consensus in the literature that effective school leaders focus on tasks related to improving classroom instruction in addition to the time they spend on the managerial aspects of their jobs. Journal of Issue Brief. Vol 4 No 5. Pg: 1-8. Sudiarta. 2008. Pengembangan Pembelajaran Berpendekatan Tematik Berorientasi Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Terbuka untuk Mengembangkan Kompetensi Berpikir Divergen, Kritis dan Kreatif. Diakses tanggal 11 Juni 2010. Sugiyono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Suhardan. 2010. Supervisi Profesional. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sukmadinata. 2007. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya. Suwarno, Wiji (2010). Pengetahuan Dasar Kepustakaan. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia. Uno, B. 2008. Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Target of research for the mendeskripsikan of: (1) characteristic of activity of
supervisor of study thematic elementary school of Donorojo I Pacitan; (2) activity
characteristic learn in study thematic elementary school of Donorojo I Pacitan; (3)
relation characteristic between supervisor with the teacher at study thematic
elementary school of Donorojo I Pacitan.
This Research type qualitative by using ethnography approach. This research
is limited Supervision of Study thematic elementary school of Donorojo I Pacitan.
Especial Data obtained from informan of like headmaster, teacher and other
supporter medium. Method of collecting with the observation, circumstantial
interview, and documentation method. Analyse the data in this research analysis
model the interactive. Test the data authenticity used in this research is trust degree
(credibility); transferability, dependability, and confirmbility.
Result from this research is; (1) characteristic of activity of supervisor of study
thematic elementary school of Donorojo I Pacitan have various its characteristic,
what one of them that supervisor block in the study thematic elementary school is
adapted for by curriculum and perceivable study planning so that by student of
class I, II and III; (2) activity characteristic learn in study thematic elementary school
of Donorojo I Pacitan have various its characteristic is which one of them that teacher
conduct the activity of early especially to create the study atmosphere capable to
push the student to focussed the self so that can follow the study process better
and kondusif; (3) relation characteristic of between supervisor with the teacher of
study thematic elementary school Donorojo I Pacitan have various characteristic,
that relation supervisor and learn in execution supervise the this study thematic
elementary school very good so that can be arrested quickly by student and water
down the way supervision of study thematic elementary school of Donorojo I Pacitan | en_US |
