Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHastuti Lastyawati, Sri
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-24T06:49:38Z
dc.date.available2013-06-24T06:49:38Z
dc.date.issued2012-01
dc.identifier.citationArikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Degeng, I Nyoman Sodana.1989. Ilmu Pengajaran Taksonomi Variabel. Jakarta: Depdikbud. Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. 2002. Psikologi Belajar Jakarta Rineka Cipta. Elliott, John. 2001. Classroom Action Research. Article. http:// www.madison.edu diakses pada 25 April 2008. Gagne, R. M., and Leslie J. Briggs. 1990. Principles of Instructional Design. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc. Lufri. 2003. “Pembelajaran Berbasis Problem Solving yang Diintervensi dengan Peta Konsep dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa dalam Mata Kuliah Perkembangan Hewan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan. No. 2 Tahun 2003. Malang: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Negeri Malang.Maryunis, Aleks. 2003. Penggunaan Peta Informasi untuk Meningkatkan Proses dan Hasil Belajar Mata Kuliah Strategi Belajar Mengajar Matematika, Jurnal Pembelajaran, volume 26, nomor 2, Juni 2003, halaman 77-91 Merrill, M.D. 1983. “Component Display Theory” dalam C.M. Reigeluth (Ed). Instructional – Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Novak, J. D. & Govin, D. B. 1985. Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press. Reigeluth, C.M. 1983. “Instructional Design: What is it And hy is it?” dalam C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.). Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status. Hillsdale, N.J: Lowrence Erlbaum Associates. Reigeluth, C.M. dan Stein, F.S. 1983. “The Elaboration Theory of Instructional” Dalam C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.). Instuctional – Design Theories and Models: An verview of Their Current Status. Hillsdale, N.J: Lowrence Erlbaum Associate. Sardiman, A. M. 2005. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar: Pedoman Bagi Guru dan Calon Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. Slameto, 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya Jakarta Rineka Cipta. Tri Daryanti. 2003. “Model Pembelajaran Bermakna dengan Peta Konsep untuk Mengoptimalkan Aktivitas Guru dan Siswa di Sekolah Dasar”. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan. No. 1 Vol. XIX, Juli, 2003. Semarang: Lembaga Penelitian UNNES. Wikipedia. 2007. Concept Map. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/concept_map Diakses pada 27 April 2011. Wiriaatmadja, Rochiati. 2006. Metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Zaini, Hisyam., Bermawy Munthe, Sekar Ayu Aryani. 2002. Desain Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi. Yogyakarta: Center for Teaching Staff Development (CTSD) IAIN Sunan Kalijaga.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1907-4034
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/3151
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the research is to increase students’ study achievement by using elaborative learning with concept mapp strategy. Concept that is learned is performing positive attitude towards Pancasila as opened Ideology. The research method used classroom action research for students class XII Tata Boga1 SMK Negeri 4 Surakarta odd semester in 2012/2013 academic year. The research is conducted in 2 cycles. The research result showed that by using elaborative learning method with concept mapp strategy can increase students study achievement class XII Tata Boga1 SMK Negeri 4 Surakarta in 2012/2013 academic year in learning PKn concept to perform positive attitude towards Pancasila as opened Ideology. It is showed by the increasing of completing students’ study and the average score of study achievement from the beginning to cycle II.en_US
dc.subjectstudy achievement PKnen_US
dc.subjectconcept mappen_US
dc.subjectelaborative learningen_US
dc.titlePeningkatan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XII Tata Boga 1 SMK Negeri 4 Surakarta dalam Pembelajaran Pkn Melalui Pembelajaran Elaboratif Strategi Peta Konsepen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record