Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUlfah, Hana Rosiana
dc.contributor.authorSupratman
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-25T02:23:32Z
dc.date.available2013-10-25T02:23:32Z
dc.date.issued2011-03
dc.identifier.citationAhmadi A, Widodo Supriyono. 2004. Psikologi Belajar. Hlm. 146-147. 215. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta. Arep I, Hendri Tanjung. 2003. Manajemen Motivasi. Hlm. 16-17. Grasindo: Jakarta. Arikunto S. 2004. Psikologi Umum dan Perkembangan. Mizan Publika: Jakarta. Azhari A. 2004. Psikologi Umum dan Perkembangan. Hlm. 65. 107. Mizan Publika: Jakarta Djamarah S. 2002. Psikologi Belajar. Hlm. 115. 166-167. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta Harsono. 2008. Model-model Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi Perspektif Sosiopolitik. Hlm. 90. Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta. Hassan F, Yuhara Sukra. 2007. Dalam Markum, M. Enoch (Ed). Pendidikan Tinggi dalam Perspektif Sejarah dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia. Hlm. 132-133. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional: Jakarta. Hartono J. 2006. Filosofi, Pendekatan, dan Penerapan Pembelajaran Metode Kasus untuk Dosen dan Mahasiswa. Hlm. 17-18. 38. Andi: Yogyakarta Hidayatullah F. 2009. Dalam Rohmadi, Muhammad (Ed). Guru Sejati : Membangun Insan Berkarakter Kuat dan Cerdas. Hlm. 155.157. Yuma Pustaka: Surakarta Hildebrand M, Kenneth Feldman. 2010. Ciri-ciri Dosen Ideal. Dalam Furchan, Arief (Ed.) Ciri-ciri Dosen Profesional. Hlm. 1-2. Diakses tgl 24 November 2010. http://www.pendidikanislam.net/index.php/untuk-guru-a-dosen/39-pendidikan/80-ciri-ciridosen-profesional?start=1 Ilyas. 2010. Peran Ideal Dosen Pembimbing Akademik dan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Dalam Educare Jurnal Pendidikan dan Budaya. Hlm. 1-2. Diakses tgl 18 Oktober 2010. educare.e-fkipunla.net/index2.php?option=com_content&doc Nasution. 2008. Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Hlm. 27. 119. 128. 129. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta. Pujadi A. 2007. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa : Studi Kasus Pada Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Bunda Mulia. Business and Management Journal Bunda Mulia. Diakses tgl 30 Oktober 2010. budhi_sp.staff.gunadarma.ac.id/.../faktor-faktor motivasi%2520belajar-jurnalarkopujadi.pdf. 1:44. 50. Sastroasmoro, Sudigdo. 2008. Dasar-dasar Metodologi Penelitian Klinis. Hlm. 49-50. 84. 96-99. 256. Sagung Seto: Jakarta. Sugiyono. 2005. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Hlm. 58. 65. Alfabeta: Bandung. Sobur A. 2009. Psikologi Umum. Hlm. 296. Pustaka Setia: Bandung Sarrazin P, Damien P. Tessier, Luc G. Pelletier, David O. Troilloud, Julien P. Channal. 2006. The Effects Of Teachers Expectations about Students’ Motivations On Teachers AutonomySupportive and Controlling Behaviors. Internasional Journal Of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Diakses tgl 3 November 2010. halshs.archivesouvertes.fr/docs/00/38/.../Sarrazin_et_al_IJSEP_2006.pdf. 1:20 Sardiman. 2001. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Hlm. 73. 87. 143. Rajawali Pers: Jakarta Salam B. 2004. Cara Belajar yang Sukses di Perguruan Tinggi. Hlm. 67-69. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta. Simamora R. 2009. Dalam Tiar, Estu (Ed). Buku Ajar Pendidikan Dalam Keperawatan. EGC: Jakarta. Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Hlm. 102. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta. Tampubolon. 2001. Perguruan Tinggi Bermutu (Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi Menghadapi Tantangan Abad Ke-21). Hlm. 175. 178. Gramedia Pustaka Utama: Jakarta. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia tentang Guru dan Dosen. 2005. Hlm. 2. Media Pusaka: Jakarta. Uno H. 2007. Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya Analisis di Bidang Pendidikan. Hlm. 3. 23. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta. Walgito B. 2004. Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Hlm. 89-91. 220. Andi: Yogyakartaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/3625
dc.description.abstractLearning necessity on college students encourages their motivation from the inside, whereas the stimulus by lecturers encourages their motivation from the outside. In college students’ opinion, some nursing lecturers have not matched what they expect yet because they are less interesting and monotonous on giving the learning material, indiscipline or not on-time. Then most of the college students stated that those things also affected the learning motivation, because the college students became lazy to listen as well as study. Whereas the college students’ perception about good-figure of lecturer according to them was the ones who were kind, smile easily, good-looking, not weighing against them, on-time, easy to get a good mark from, not selfish, giving time outside the class to consult with, friendly and close in the learning process either inside or outside the class, able to give the learning material clearly and easy to understand as well as able to stimulate the college students’ learning motivation. The purpose of this research is to understand the relationship between college students’ perception towards nursing lecturers and learning motivation in nursing department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. This research was analytic research with correlative approach. The population of this research was all active college students of Nursing Department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta year 2007-2010 whose total was 921 college students with 90 college students as sample. The used sample extraction technique in this research was proportionate stratified random sampling. Bivariate test using spearman rank showed that there was no significant relationship between college students’ perception towards lecturers and college students’ learning motivation (p = 0.454).en_US
dc.publisherlppmumsen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.subjectlectureren_US
dc.subjectlearning motivationen_US
dc.subjectcollege studenten_US
dc.titleHubungan antara Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Dosen dengan Motivasi Belajar di Program Studi Keperawatan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakartaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record