Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThamrin, Husni
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-20T06:16:20Z
dc.date.available2013-11-20T06:16:20Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citation[1] Eric S. Raymond, The Cathedral & the Bazaar, Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O'Reilly, 2000. [2] Allen, R. C., "Collective invention," Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, vol. 4, pp. 124, 1983. [3] James J. Flink. The Car Culture. MIT Press, 1997. [4] David M. Berry, Copy, Rip, Burn: the Politics of Copyleft and Open Source, London: Pluto Press, 2008. [5] Rosemary J. Coombe, The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation and the Law, London: Duke University Press, 1998. [6] Eric S. Raymond, "A Brief History of Hackerdom," in Open Sources: Voice from the Open Source Revolution, O'Reilly, 1999. [7] Leslie Horn (2011, Jan.), "Android Leap Frogs Apple in Mobile OS Market Share", PC Magazine. [Online] Available at http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2375417,00.asp [8] Fadi P. Deek, James A.M. McHugh, Open Source Technology and Policy. Cambridge University Press, 2008. [9] Ben Klemens, Math You Can't Use, Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2006. [10] Robert W. Hahn, "Government Policy towards Open Source Software: An Overview," in Government Policy towards Open Source Software, Robert W. Hahn, Ed. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2002. [11] Laurence Favier, Joel Mekhantar, Marie-Noelle Terrasse, "Use of OSS by Local e-Administration: The French Situation," in Handbook of Research on Open Source Software: Technological, Economic and Social Perspectives, Kirk St. Amant, Brian Still, Ed. New York: Information Science Reference, 2007, pp. 428 – 444.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-979-636-118-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/3864
dc.description.abstractThe writing is based on literature study obtained from books and white papers and personal interview with several practitioners, governmental policy makers and students. Past experiences tells that open development or similar concept of activity helped improve a product and gave maximum benefit to the community. Open development of computer software leads to production of open source software (OSS). Embracing OSS helps promote the use of legal software, encourage the production and improvement of available OSS, educate students to good programming techniques, raise the knowledge of students on computer and operating systems, and promote the construction of community that shares and cares. The study concludes that embracing open source software is the best way to empower public potentials.en_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartaen_US
dc.subjectIndex Terms--communityen_US
dc.subjectcultureen_US
dc.subjectdevelopmenten_US
dc.subjectopen source softwareen_US
dc.titleEmbracing Open Source Software to Empower Potentials of Communityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record