Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohan, Arvie
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-16T03:18:02Z
dc.date.available2013-12-16T03:18:02Z
dc.date.issued2012-09
dc.identifier.citationBuku, Makalah, Artikel Jurnal, dan Karangan/Esai Absori, 2010, Hukum Ekonomi Indonesia: Beberapa Aspek Pengembangan pada Era Liberalisasi Perdagangan, UMS Press, Surakarta. Andriychuk, O., “Rediscovering the Spirit of Competition: On the Normative Value of the Competitive Process”, European Competition Journal, Vol. 6 (3), 2010. Anggraini, A.M.T., 2003, Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat: Perse Illegal atau Rule of Reason, FH UI, Jakarta. Anwar, A., 1992, Hukum Paten dan Perundang-Undangan Paten Indonesia, Djambatan, Jakarta. Bohannan, C., Hovenkamp, H., “IP dan Antitrust: Reformation and Harm”, Boston College Law Review, Vol. 51, 2010. Bowman, W., 2004, “Patent and Antitrust Law”, Foundations of Intellectual Property, Robert P. Merges dan Jane C. Ginsburg (ed), Foundation Press, New York. Burke, B., 1993, Personal Property in A Nutshell (Second Edition), West Publishing Co., Minnesota. Chappatte, P., “FRAND Commitments: The Case for Antitrust Intervention”, European Competition Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2, August 2009. Cheeseman, H.R., 2001, Business Law: Ethical, International & E-Commerce Environment (Fourth Edition), Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Coco, R., “Antitrust Liability For Refusal To License Intellectual Property: A Comparative Analysis and the International Setting”, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 12 Issue (1) 2008. Colston, C., 1999, Principles of Intellectual Property Law, Cavendish Publishing Limited, London. Dagun, S.M., 1992, Pengantar Filsafat Ekonomi, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta. DesForges, C.D., 2001, The Commercial Exploitation of Intellectual Property Rights by Licensing, Thorogood, London. Drahos, P., 2005, A Philosophy of Intellectual Property, Antony Rowe, Wilshire. Epstein, R.A., “Skepticism and Freedom: A Modern Case for Classical Liber- alism”, edisi Indonesia: Skeptisisme dan Kebebasan: Pembelaan Modern untuk Liberalisme Klasik, diterjemahkan Sugianto Tandra dan A. Zaim Rofiqi, Freedom Institute-Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta. Freeman, M.D.A., 1994, LLOYD’S Introduction to Jurisprudence, Sweet & Maxwell Limited, London. Gautama, S., 1990, Segi-Segi Hukum Hak Milik Intelektual, Eresco, Bandung. Gellhorn, E., Kovavic, W.E., 1994, Antitrust Law and Economics: in a Nut- shell, West Publishing Co., Minnesota. Ghidini, G., 2006, Intellectual Property and Competition Law: The Innovation Nexus, Edward Elgar Publishing, Massachusetts. Giocoli, N., “Competition vs. Property Rights: American Antitrust Law, The Freiburg School and The Early Years of European Competition Policy”, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, volume 5, Issue (4), 18 December 2009. Groves, P.J., 1997, Sourcebook on Intellectual Property Law, Cavendish Publishing Limited, London. Grubb, P.W., 2004, Patent for Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology, Oxford University Press, New York. Habermas, J., 1996, “Faktizitaat und Geltung: Beitrage zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats”, English’s edition Between Facts and Norms: Constributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democrazy, translated by William Rehg, Polity Press, Cambride. Hart, H.L.A., 2009, The Concept of Law, edisi Indonesia, Konsep Hukum, diterjemahkan M. Khozim, Nusa Media, Bandung. Hartono, C.F.G.S., “Upaya Menyusun Ekonomi Indonesia Pasca Tahun 2003”, Seminar Pembangunan Nasional VIII: Penegakan Hukum Dalam Era Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, Denpasar 14-18 Juli 2003. Hartono, S.R., 2007, Hukum Ekonomi Indonesia, Banyumedia Publishing, Malang. Hawin, M., 2010, Intellectual Property Law on Parallel Importation, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta. Head, J.W., 2002, Pengantar Hukum Ekonomi, ELIPS, Jakarta. Ibrahim, J., 2006, Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Filosofi, Teori dan Implikasi Penerapannya di Indonesia, Banyumedia Publishing, Malang. Kaplow, L., Shavell, S., “Economic Analysis of Law”, Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business Discussion, Paper Series 251, 02-07-1999, Massachusetts. Kaplow, L., Shavell, S., “Fairness versus Welfare: Notes on The pareto Principle, Preferences, and Distributive Justice”, Journal of Legal Studies, volume 32 issue (1), Januari 2003. Kelsen, H., 2006, “Pure Theory of Law”, edisi Indonesia Teori Hukum Murni: Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif, diterjemahkan Raisul Muttaqien, Nusamedia & Nuansa, Bandung. Kelsen, H., 2006, “General Theory of State”, edisi Indonesia: Teori Umum tentang Hukum dan Negara, diterjemahkan Raisul Muttaqien, Nusamedia & Nuansa, Bandung. Keraf, S., 1997, Hukum Kodrat dan Teori Hak Milik Pribadi, Kanisius, Yogyakarta. Kieff, F.S., Paredes, T.A., “The Basics Matter: At the Periphery of Intellectual Property”, The George Washington Law Review, vol. 73:174, 21 Desember 2004. Lemley, M.A., “The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law”, Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, 1997. Lubis, T.M., 2007, Catatan Hukum Todung Mulya Lubis, Kompas Media Nusantara, Jakarta. Lindsey, T., Damain, B., Butt, S., Utomo, T.S., 2005, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, kerjasama Asian Law Group-Alumni, Bandung. Maulana, I.B., 1996, Lisensi Paten, Citra Aditya Bakti, Jakarta. McManis, C.R., 2004, Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition, West Publishing, Minnesota Pate, R.W.,”Competition and Intellectual Property in the US: Licensing Free- dom and the Limits of Antitrust”, Claus-Dieter Ehlermann dan Isabela Atanasiu (ed), 2007, European Competition Law Annual 2005: The Interaction between Competition Law and Intellectual Property Law, Hart Publishing, Oregon. Pieris, J., Jim, N., 2008, Etika Bisnis & Good Corporate Governance, Pelangi Cendekia dengan Magister Ilmu Hukum UKI, Jakarta. Pitofsky, R., “The Essential Facilities Doctrine under United States Antitrust Law”, Submitted to the European Commission in Support of National Data Corporation in its essential facilities case against IMS (tanpa tahun). Plunkett, C., “Introduction to Intellectual Property”, Cotter, A.M.M. (ed), 2003, Intellectual Property Law, Cavendish Publishing Limited, London. Priyono, B.H., “Neoliberalisme dan Sifat Elusif Kebebasan”, Kebudayaan Dewan Kesenian Jakarta, Taman Ismail Marzuki Jakarta, 10 November 2006. Purba, A.Z., 2011, Perjanjian TRIPs dan Beberapa Isu Srtategis, kerjasama FH UI dan Alumni, Bandung. Poltorak, A.I., Lerner, P.J., 2002, Essentials of Intellectual Property, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York. Poltorak, A.I., Lerner, P.J., 2004, Essentials of Licensing Intellectual Property, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey. Purwaningsih, E., 2005, Perkembangan Hukum Intellectual Property Rights, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor. Rajagukguk, Erman, Filsafat Legal Positivism menyangkut Hukum Ekonomi, Bahan Kuliah Filsafat Hukum III FH UI, Depok. (tanpa tahun). Rasuanto, B., 2005, Keadilan Sosial: Pandangan Deontologis Rawls dan Habermas (Dua Filsafat Politik Modern), Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta. Rawls, J., 2011, “A Theory of Justice”, edisi Indonesia: Teori Keadilan: DasarDasar Filsafat Politik untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan dalam Negara, diterjemahkan Uzair Fauzan dan Heru Prasetyo, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta. Rothbard, N., 2007, “What Has Government Done to Our Money”, edisi Indonesia: Apa yang Dilakukan Pemerintah terhadap Uang Kita: Sebuah Pengantar Komprehensif Ekonomi Uang dari Mazhad Austria, diterjemahkan Sukasah Syahdan, Granit, Jakarta. Saidin, O.K., 2004, Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual Property Rights), RajaGrafindo, Jakarta. Schindler, G., “Wagging the Dog? Reconsidering Antitrust-based Regulation of IP-Licensing”, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 12 Issue 1, 2008. Setiawan, M., “Analisis Hubungan Antara Struktur, Perilaku, dan Pereformasi Industri di Indonesia,”, Diskusi Ilmiah Laboratorium Penelitian, Pengabdian pada Masyarakat dan Pengkajian Ekonomi (LP3E), Fakultas Ekonomi UNPAD, 27 Januari 2006. Shapiro, C., “Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements”, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 34 (2), 2003. Shapiro, I., 2006, “The Moral Foundations of Politics”, edisi Indonesia: Asas Moral dalam Politik, diterjemahkan Theresia Wuryanti dan Trisno Sutanto, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta. Shenefield, J.H., Stelzer, I.M., 2001, The Antitrust Law: A Primer (Fourth Edition), The AEI Press, Washington. Simanjuntak, E.P., 2006, Hukum Anti Monopoli, Bahan Kuliah Magister Hukum Bisnis FH UGM, Yogyakarta. Smith, G.V., Parr, R.L., 2004, Intellectual Property Licensing and Joint Venture Profit Strategies (Third Edition), John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey. Widjaja, G., 2004, Lisensi atau Waralaba: Suatu Panduan Praktis, RajaGrafindo, Jakarta. Dokumen Hukum Commission Decision of 16.12.2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C-3/39.530–Microsoft Tying)) European Commission, 2011, EU Competition Law: Rules Applicable to Antitrust Enforcement (Vol. 1: General Rule), Official Journal of the European Union, Brussels. Guidance on the Commission’s enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant under- takings. OECD, 1996, Abuse of Dominance and Monopoliation, OECD Head of Publications Service, Paris. OECD, 1996, The Essential Facilities Concept, OECD Head of Publications Service, Paris. Peraturan KPPU No. 2 Tahun 2009 tentang Pedoman Pengecualian Penerapan UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Berkaitan dengan HaKI. Putusan Perkara KPPU Nomor: 03/KPPU-L/2008. Putusan Perkara KPPU Nomor: 17/KPPU-I/2010. Sherman Act. UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. UU No. 30 Tahun 2000 tentang Rahasia Dagang. UU No. 31 Tahun 2000 tentang Desain Industri. UU No. 32 Tahun 2000 tentang Desain Tata Letak Sirkuit Terpadu. UU No. 14 Tahun 2001 tentang Paten. UU No. 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek. UU No. 19 Tahun 2002 tentang Hak Cipta. WIPO, 2004, Intellectual Property Handbook, WIPO Publication, Geneva. 1995 Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1410-7880
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/4009
dc.description.abstractE ssentially, anti-monopoly and intellectual property are properly per ceived as complementary bodies of law that work together to bring innovation: anti-monopoly laws protect robust competition in the mar- ketplace, while intellectual property laws protect the ability to earn a return on the investments necessary to innovate. The conflicts of both regimes potentially exist, such as when unilateral refusals to license, sell, use, or share intellectual property rights by dominant firms affect the dynamics of competition. On the one hand, the legal monopoly based upon intellectual property laws gives the owner the right to exclude third parties from the protected asset, subject only to the exceptions established for various purposes by the relevant domestic and international laws. On the other hand, when the legal monopoly impacts on market competition, anti-monopoly law enforcement can outlaw or limit the exclusivity and serve as the grounds for a compulsory license order.en_US
dc.publisherlppmumsen_US
dc.subjectanti-monopoly lawen_US
dc.subjectlicense intellectual propertyen_US
dc.subjectcompetitionen_US
dc.titleLISENSI HAKI DALAM KAEDAH NORMATIF ANTI MONOPOLIen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record