DIALEKTIKA HUKUM MODERN DAN HUKUM TRADISIONAL DALAM BINGKAI LOGIKA REVOLUSI SAINS
| dc.contributor.author | Surbakti, Natangsa | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-12-16T03:28:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-12-16T03:28:02Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Berman,Harold J., 1983, Law and Revolution, The Formation of Western Law Tradition, Cambridge- Massachusetts, Harvard Law School. Kuhn, Thomas S., 2002, The Structure of Scientific Revolution Peran Paradigma Dalam Revolusi Sains, Bandung, Remaja Rosda Karya. Kusumohamidjojo, Budiono, 2000, Kebhinekaan Masyarakat di Indonesia Suatu Problematik Filsafat Kebudayaan, Jakarta, Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. Nawawi Arief, Barda, 1994, Beberapa Aspek Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum Pidana (Menyongsong GenerasiBaruHukum Pidana Indonesia), Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, 25 Juni 1994. Rahardjo, Satjipto,2002, Indonesia Inginkan Penegakan Hukum Progresif, Artikel Kompas, Senin, 15 Juli 2002. Rahardjo, Satjipto,2004, Siapa Bilang Jaksa Tak Butuh Keberanian?, Artikel dalam Kompas, Rabu 04 Agustus 2004. Rahardjo, Satjipto, 2004, Menuju Produk Hukum Progresif (Makalah disampaikan dalam Diskusi Terbatas Bagian Tata Negara, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro) Semarang, Kamis 24 Juni 2004. Surbakti, Natangsa, 2010, Filsafat Hukum Perkembangan Pemikiran dan Relevansinya dengan Reformasi Hukum Indonesia, Surakarta, BP FKIP UMS. Surbakti, Natangsa, 2011, KebijakanLegislasiPermaafan Dalam Kebijakan Legislasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, Semarang, Program DoktorIlmuHukum. Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo, 1994, Dari Hukum Kolonial ke Hukum Nasional, Dinamika Sosial-Politik dalam Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta, Rajawali. Zehr, Howard, 2002, Little Book of Restorative Justice, Intercourse, PA 17534: Good Books. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1410-7880 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/4012 | |
| dc.description.abstract | S eeking justice had found some impasse in fighting for reaching of sense of justice, passing from a bureaucracional mechanism of the straightening of law which is more tread on a procedure, in turn keep away society citizen from hungered for sense of justice. Searcher justice society always looking for the breakthrough by saw it back over the concept of punishment and justice which consist in a traditional laws area, which is on period modern law era had some glorious, the traditional law had a worst experience which is had some pulled over. Further development, theorists engage to advocate society looking for justice. They are not only to observe and to develop the notion of traditional law, but also to facilitate solving lawcases especially informal court lawcases. Through the positive collaboration with other actors, lawcases outside the court run synergist as comprehensive mechanism to solve the problem. In sociological empirical idea of law and legal justice in postmodern legal perspective has been present in the world of law enforcement nationwide. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | lppmums | en_US |
| dc.subject | Traditional Law | en_US |
| dc.subject | Substantive Justice | en_US |
| dc.subject | Restorative Justice | en_US |
| dc.title | DIALEKTIKA HUKUM MODERN DAN HUKUM TRADISIONAL DALAM BINGKAI LOGIKA REVOLUSI SAINS | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
