| dc.identifier.citation | Anderson, Benedict R. 1990. O’G, Language and Power Exploring Political Cultures in Indonesia, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Austin, J. 1954. The Province of Jurisprudence. Azhari, Aidul Fitriciada. 2010. Tafsir Konstitusi Pergulatan Mewujudkan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Solo: Jagad Abjad. Azhari, Aidul Fitriciada. 2011.UUD 1945 sebagai Revolutiegrondwet Tafsir Poskolonial atas Gagasan-gagasan Revolusioner dalam Wacana Konstitusi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra. Budiardjo, Miriam. 1977. Masalah Kenegaraan. Jakarta: Gramedia. Glenn, H. Patrick. 2000. Legal Tradition of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Habermas, Jurgen. 1999. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, Mass. : The MIT Press. Hatta, Mohammad. “Ke Arah Indonesia Merdeka” at Miriam Budiardjo. 1977. Masalah Kenegaraan. Jakarta: Gramedia. Huda, Miftakhul Huda et al. 2010. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jakarta: Sekretariat MKRI. Huntington, Samuel P., 1995. Gelombang Demokrasi Ketiga, Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti. Kartodirdjo, Sartono. “From Ethno-Nationalism to the “Indonesia Merdeka” Movement 1908-1925”. Sri Kuhnt-Saptodewo, Volker Grabowsky, dan Martin Grosheim Kelsen, Hans, 1973. General Theory of Law and State. New York: Russel & Russel. Kusuma, RM. A.B., 2004. Lahirnya Undang-Undang Dasat 1945. Jakarta: BP Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. Lev, Daniel S., “Colonial Law and the Genesis of the Indonesian State.” Indonesia 40 Lukito, Ratno. 1998. Pergumulan Antara Hukum Islam dan Adapt di Indonesia. Jakarta: INIS. Popper, Karl. 2002. Conjectures and Refutations. London/New York: Routledge. Rambe, Safrizal. 2008. Sarekat Islam Pelopor Bangkitnya Nasionalisme Indonesia 19051942. Jakarta: Yayasan Kebangkitan Insan Cendekia. Rothermund, Dietmar, “Nationalism and the Reconstruction of Traditions in Asia”. Sri Kuhnt-Saptodewo, Volker Grabowsky, dan Martin Grosheim Saptodewo, Sri Kuhnt-, Volker Grabowsky, dan Martin Grosheim “SBY: Tak Mungkin Ada Monarki di Indonesia,” Harian Yogya, 26 November 2010. Soekarno. 1959. Res Publica Sekali Lagi Res Publica. Jakarta: Kementrian Penerangan RI. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The research focuses to investigate the ideas of reconstruction of constitutional tradition
among the founding father of Indonesia and its development in practices before and after the
amendment of the Indonesian Constitution. Based on documentary or normative research, the
research finds that there are two pattern of reconstruction of tradition in Indonesia, which is
used as model for reconstruction of tradition in the constitution, namely the absolute
particular and the relative particular. Historically, before the amendment of the Indonesian
Constitution, the reconstruction of tradition was practiced based on absolute particular model,
while after the constitutional amendment tends to reject to reconstruct the tradition at the
national structure but recognize the tradition at local structure. Generally, it can be concluded that the amendment of the Indonesian Constitution does not have an obvious pattern of reconstruction of tradition. It contradicts with the original meaning of the founders that obviously believed tradition as a basic to create a national constitutional system. | en_US |
