| dc.contributor.author | Anif, Sofyan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-02-19T06:10:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-02-19T06:10:10Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | ___________. 2004. Uji Kompetensi Guru Nasional. Jakarta: Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1998. Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. ___________, 2012. Badan Pengembangan SDM Pendidikan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidi- kan: Analisis Data Hasil UKA Tahun 2012. Baedowi, 2009. Kajian Implementasi Sertifikasi Guru dalam Jabatan. Makalah Seminar di Universitas Negeri Jakarta. BNSP. 2007. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta. Debling, G. 1995. “The Employment Department Training Agency Standarts Program: Im- plications for Education”, dalam Burke, J.W. (Ed).Competency Based Education and training. London-New York-Philadelphia: The Farmer Press.h. 77-94. Echols, J.M. dan Shadily, H. 2002. Kamus Inggris Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia. Cetakan XXVI. Kenezevich, S.J. 1984. Administration of Public Education. New York: Harper Collin Publisher. Jones, James J. dan Walters, Donald L. 2008. Human Resources Management in Education (Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Q – Media. Malik, Rizal. 2010. Indonesia dan Human Development Index. Makalah Disampaikandalam Seminar tentang Prospek Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia dalam Era Globalisasi Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kampus Universitas Indonesia. November. Muhroji & Fathoni, Ahmad. 2006. Manajemen Pendidikan. Surakarta: FKIP UMS. Mulyasa, E. 2012.Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Musfah, J. 2011. Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru: Melalui Pelatihan dan Sumber Belajar, Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: KencanaPrenada Media Grup. Sagala, Syaiful. 2007. Administrasi Pendidikan Kontemporer. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sanusi, A. (2007). Fakta, Kebijakan, Ilmu, Filsafah Pendidikan. Bahan Perkuliahan. Bandung: PPS UNINUS. Saud, Udin Saefudin. 2009. Pengembangan Profesi Guru. Penerbit: Alfabeta, Bandung. Sugiyono, 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sugiyono, 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: PendekatanKuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sukmadinata, N. sy. (2006). Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktik. Cetakan ke-8. Bandung: Rosdakarya. Tuxworth, E. 1995. “Competency based Education and Training: Background and Origins”, dalam Burke, J.W. (Ed). Competency Based Education and Training. London-New YorkPhiladelphia: The Falmer Press.h. 10-25. Wolf, A. 1995. “Can Competence and Knowledge Mix?” dalam Burke, J.W. (Ed).Competency Based Education and Training. London-New York-Philadelphia: The Falmer Press. h. 39-53 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0852-0976 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/4307 | |
| dc.description.abstract | As stated in UU No. 14, 2005 and PP No. 74, 2008 that teachers as proffessional
educator have to possess four competences, namely: pedagogic, proffessional, character,
and social.
However the condition in Indonesia is not like that. In general, they are in low
category, specifically in pedagogic and proffessional. Those conditions happen
in biology
teachers and
other teacher subjects. Then the aim of this study is to observe the profile of
biology teachers especially their proffessional competence pasca sertification in Surakarta
residance. The population of this study is all biology teachers
(332 persons) that have
rechieved sertification through direct, portofolio, and
PLPG program. Purposive random
sampling is used to get 116 teachers. Data are collected by depth interview, documentation,
and test, then the collected data are analysed by descriptive qualitative. The result
shows that the profile of
proffessional competence of biology teachers can be grouped
into three: low, middle, and high. The teachers are low in: concept implementation, using
tool of measurements, biology experiment planning, using the result
of reflection, self reflection,
understanding
the
principles
and
theories
of
savety
work,
doing
action
research,
and
understanding the steps of biology experiement correctly. The teachers are middle
in: understanding the objective of the study, creative and innovative in implementing and
developing science of biology nad correlated sciences, undesrtanding thinking process of
biology, using symbolic language, undesrtanding standard competence,
and understanding
the
scoupe
of
biology.
They
are
high
in:
understanding
the
structure
biology
science
and
its
correlation,
selecting
the
material,
cooking
the
material
creatively,
understanding
the
concepts,
laws,
and
biology
theories,
undesrtanding
the
history
of
the
natural
science,
specifically
biology, understanding
the basic competence of the subject
or topic, updating
their
knowledge
from
many
sources,
and
rationally
qualitatively
and
quantitatively
in understanding
the process
and biology law. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta | en_US |
| dc.subject | proffessional competence | en_US |
| dc.subject | biology teachers | en_US |
| dc.subject | post teachers certification | en_US |
| dc.title | Profil Kompetensi Profesional Guru Mapel Biologi Pasca Sertifikasi di Karesidenan Surakarta | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
