Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThoyibi, Muhammad
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-18T07:05:50Z
dc.date.available2014-03-18T07:05:50Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-25
dc.identifier.citationBradford, Richard. 1997. Stylistics. London: Routledge. Brown, Penelope dan Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brown, Roger dan Albert Gilman. 1989. “Politeness Theory and Shakespeare's Four Major Tragedies.” Language in Society 18, 159-212. Culpaper, Jonathan.. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness,” Journal of Pragmatics 25, 349-367. ----------.2005. “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link’”. Journal of Politeness Research 1, 35-72. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, Anne Wichmann. 2003. “Impoliteness Revisited: with Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35, 1545–1580. Feuerbach, Ludwig. The Essence of Christianity. Frazer, Sir James George. 1925. The Golden Bough: A Study on Magic and Religion. New York: Macmillan. Habermas, Gary R. 1996. The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ. New York: College Press Publishing Company, Inc. Harris, Mark W. 2009. The A to Z of Unitarian Universalism. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press. Harris, Sandra. 2001. “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse and Society 12, 451-472. Haugh, Michael. 2010. When Is An Email Really Offensive?: Argumentativity and Variability in Evaluations of Impoliteness.” Journal of Impoliteness Research 6, 7-31. Junus, Umar. 1989. Stilistik: Satu Pengantar. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman. Mills, Sarah. 2009. “Impoliteness in Cultural Context.” Journal of Pragmatics 41, 1047-1060. Pilar, Garces Conejos Blitvich. 2009. “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: The Culture Wars.” Journal of Politeness Research 5, 273-303. Sanz, Rosa Lores. 1998. “The applicability of Linguistic Politeness Studies to Translation: A Case Study,” Miscelanea: A Journal of English and American Studies 19, 89-109. Sosiowati, I Gusti Ayu Gde. 2013. “Kesantunan Bahasa Politisi dalam Talk Show di Metro TV”. Disertasi. Denpasar: Universitas Udayana. Swingewood, Alan dan Diana Laurenson. 1972. The Sociology of Literature. London: Paladin. Trilling, Lionel. 1967. “On the Modern Element in Modern Literature” dalam Irving Howe, Literary Modernism. New York: Fawcett Publication. Wellek, Rene dan Austin Warren. 1949. Theory of Literature. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-979-636-156-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/4362
dc.description.abstractStudies on impoliteness have focused on the authentic interaction between participants. On the one hand, the sources of the interaction have varied including the dialogues between characters in plays. However, the studies have treated the dialogues as authentic rather than artificial ones, disregarding the author as part of the communication event, on the other hand. In this paper, I put the author at the central role in the communication with the impersonal reader both at the individual and collective level. Finally, I demonstrate that impoliteness in literature serves as a tool for the author to communicate his criticism against the dominant culture.en_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartaen_US
dc.subjectTeologi Trinitarianismeen_US
dc.subjectKetidaksantunanen_US
dc.subjectThe Escaped Cocken_US
dc.subjectD. H. Lawrenceen_US
dc.titleKritik atas Teologi Trinitarianisme: Ketidaksantunan dalam The Escaped Cock Karya D. H. Lawrenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record