dc.contributor.author | Wuryani, Tri | |
dc.contributor.author | Clarentina, Sri Suwanti | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-04-16T07:50:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-04-16T07:50:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Atma, Jaya Unika (2013) www.umumkompasriana.com diakses tanggal 19 Desember 2013 Bruce, W.C. dan J.K. Bruce. (1992). Teach-ing with Inquiry. Maryland: Alpha Publishing Company, Inc. Hamalik, O. (1991). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: CV Sinar Baru. Ibrahim. Muslimin., dkk. (2004). Materi Pe-latihan Terintegrasi: Sains. Jakarta:tp Ibrahim dan Nur, (2000: 13) Strategi Pembelajaran, Surabaya:tp Mazra. www.mazrawul84’s.blog.com diakses tanggal 10 Januari 2014 Mulyani Sumantri dan Johar Permana (2000) Pembelajaran yang Efektif. Jakarta:Sahid Press Nur, Mohamad. (2001). Asesmen dalam Pendidikan Sains. Makalah dalam Overseas Roestiyah, N.K (1998) Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Asdi Mahasatya Rahmadani,agus www.kebobandel.com diakses tanggal 19 Juli 2013 Suherman, H.Erman dkk. 2003. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontenporer. Bandung : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Suparno, P. (1997). Filsafat Kons- truktivitas dalam Pendidikan.Yogjakarta: Kanisius. Wahyu,( 2001), Informasi dan Berita, Jakarta:Sahid jaya Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1907-4034 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/4411 | |
dc.description.abstract | The problem in this study is the low ability students MAN Suruh have in
making a conclusion from the information that is being heard. Associated
with the need for innovation in teaching and learning processes them by using the
method of inquiry. This study is an action research with qualitative approach and
descriptive methods. Implementation of the study consisted of two cycles and
every two cycles of learning activities. Each cycle includes four stages: planning,
implementation, observation and reflection. Retrieval of data using test techniques,
observation and documentation. Tool makers essay test item data, observation
sheets, and a list of values. The results showed improvement by comparing its
CMC (criterian minimum completeness) value or score 80. This is reflected in the
first cycle, because in this cycle for the first activity test results to make a conclusion
that the value or score 80 or more only 54.55 %, the second activity increased to
54.55 %. While the average student learning outcomes of the two activities in the
first cycle of 54.55 %. In the second cycle for the first activity that reaches CMC is
72 %, while the second activity that reached the CMC is 90 %. It can be concluded
that the application of the inquiry method of learning makes us hear the conclusion
of invormasi can improve the ability to make inferences from the information that is
being heard. For the liveliness, the first cycle of learning first 57 %, second 84 %
of learning, first learning cycle II 90 %, and 100 % active learner II. In other words
the end result, 90 % of 33 students can make inferences and 100 % of active
students. Related to that, this action research proved. | en_US |
dc.publisher | LPPM UMS | en_US |
dc.subject | information that is heard | en_US |
dc.subject | make inferences | en_US |
dc.subject | inquiry method | en_US |
dc.title | Peningkatan Kemampuan Siswa Membuat Kesimpulan dari Informasi yang Didengar Melalui Metode Inkuiri | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |