Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWuryani, Tri
dc.contributor.authorClarentina, Sri Suwanti
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-16T07:50:52Z
dc.date.available2014-04-16T07:50:52Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.identifier.citationAtma, Jaya Unika (2013) www.umumkompasriana.com diakses tanggal 19 Desember 2013 Bruce, W.C. dan J.K. Bruce. (1992). Teach-ing with Inquiry. Maryland: Alpha Publishing Company, Inc. Hamalik, O. (1991). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: CV Sinar Baru. Ibrahim. Muslimin., dkk. (2004). Materi Pe-latihan Terintegrasi: Sains. Jakarta:tp Ibrahim dan Nur, (2000: 13) Strategi Pembelajaran, Surabaya:tp Mazra. www.mazrawul84’s.blog.com diakses tanggal 10 Januari 2014 Mulyani Sumantri dan Johar Permana (2000) Pembelajaran yang Efektif. Jakarta:Sahid Press Nur, Mohamad. (2001). Asesmen dalam Pendidikan Sains. Makalah dalam Overseas Roestiyah, N.K (1998) Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Asdi Mahasatya Rahmadani,agus www.kebobandel.com diakses tanggal 19 Juli 2013 Suherman, H.Erman dkk. 2003. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontenporer. Bandung : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Suparno, P. (1997). Filsafat Kons- truktivitas dalam Pendidikan.Yogjakarta: Kanisius. Wahyu,( 2001), Informasi dan Berita, Jakarta:Sahid jaya Press.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1907-4034
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/4411
dc.description.abstractThe problem in this study is the low ability students MAN Suruh have in making a conclusion from the information that is being heard. Associated with the need for innovation in teaching and learning processes them by using the method of inquiry. This study is an action research with qualitative approach and descriptive methods. Implementation of the study consisted of two cycles and every two cycles of learning activities. Each cycle includes four stages: planning, implementation, observation and reflection. Retrieval of data using test techniques, observation and documentation. Tool makers essay test item data, observation sheets, and a list of values. The results showed improvement by comparing its CMC (criterian minimum completeness) value or score 80. This is reflected in the first cycle, because in this cycle for the first activity test results to make a conclusion that the value or score 80 or more only 54.55 %, the second activity increased to 54.55 %. While the average student learning outcomes of the two activities in the first cycle of 54.55 %. In the second cycle for the first activity that reaches CMC is 72 %, while the second activity that reached the CMC is 90 %. It can be concluded that the application of the inquiry method of learning makes us hear the conclusion of invormasi can improve the ability to make inferences from the information that is being heard. For the liveliness, the first cycle of learning first 57 %, second 84 % of learning, first learning cycle II 90 %, and 100 % active learner II. In other words the end result, 90 % of 33 students can make inferences and 100 % of active students. Related to that, this action research proved.en_US
dc.publisherLPPM UMSen_US
dc.subjectinformation that is hearden_US
dc.subjectmake inferencesen_US
dc.subjectinquiry methoden_US
dc.titlePeningkatan Kemampuan Siswa Membuat Kesimpulan dari Informasi yang Didengar Melalui Metode Inkuirien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record