| dc.identifier.citation | Isdijoso, Brhamantio dan Tri Wibowo. 2002. Analisis Kebijakan Fiskal Pada Era Otonomi Daerah (Studi Kasus: Sektor Pendidikan di Surakarta). http://fiskal.depkeu.go.id/ webbkf/kajian%5CBramtri-1.pdf http://fiskal.depkeu.go.id/ webbkf/kajian%5CBramtri-1.pdf.Diakses tang¬gal 18 November 2010. Media Indonesia Online. 2008. Pendidikan Yang Tidak Pernah Tuntas. http://meekfoundation.org/index.php?act=articles&type=h&do=view&id=279.Diakses tanggal 18 November 2010. Nainggolan, Pahala. 2010. Menggugat Desen¬tralisasi Fiskal Pendidikan Dasar. http://pahalanainggolan.wordpress.com/2010/10/06menggugat-desentralisasi-pendidikan-dasar. Diakses tanggal 18 November 2010. Usman, Syaikhu., M. Sulton Mawardi, Adri Poesoro, Asep Suryahadi. 2008. Meka-nisme dan Penggunaan Dana Alokasi Khusus. Laporan Hasil Penelitian Lembaga Penelitian Semeru. http://www.semeru.or.id/report/research/dak/dak_ind.pdf. Diakses tanggal 18 November 2010. Waluyu, Joko. 2008. Dampak Desentralisasi Fiskal Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Ketimpangan Pendapatan Antar Daerah di Indonesia Tahun 2001-2005. http://mrwaluyu.blogspot.com/2008/02.dampak-desentralisasi-fiskal.html. Diakses tanggal 18 November 2010. Baltagi, Badi H. 2001.Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Boissiere, Maurice. 2004. Determinants of Primary Education Outcomes in Deve¬loping Countries, OED Working Papers, World Bank. Brodjonegoro, Bambang. 2003. Three Years of Fiscal Decentralization in Indonesia: It’s Impact on Regional Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability.Jakarta: Depart¬ment of Economics, University of Indonesia. Elmi, Bachrul. 2002. Kebijakan Desentralisasi Fiskal Kaitannya Dengan Hutang Luar Negeri Pemerintah Daerah Otonom. Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan. Vol. 6, No. 4, Desember. Faguet, J.Paul and Fabio Sanchez. 2006. Decentralization’s effects on educational outcomes in Bolivia and Colombia, London School of Economics and Political Science. Glewwe, Paul. 2002. Schools and skills in Developing Countries: Education Poli-ciesand Socioeconomicc Outcomes. Journal of Economic Literature 40:436-482. Greene, William H.1997.Econometric Analysis, third edition, London: Prentice Hall. Hsiao, Cheng. 2003. Analysis of Panel Data: Second Edition, Cambridge University Press. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. 2009. Ikhtisar Data Pendidikan Nasional. Murillo, M.V., M. Tommasi, L.Ronconi, dan J.Sanguinetti. 2002. The economic Effects of unions in Latin America: Teachers unions and education in Argentina. Research network. Working Paper #R-463, Inter-American Develop¬ment Bank. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | In education, one crusial issue of development is the disparity of primary education access. Using 440 regions database from 2005-2009, this study is aim to analize the impact of fiscal decentralization in reducing the enrolement of primary education in Indonesia. Three factors were included, i.e fiscal decentralization, socioeconomic factors and regional characteristics. The result of panel data estimation using fixed-effect approach on this study is that DAK for Education, DAK Non Education, and PAD have significant impact in reducing education acess disparity along with poverty and regional characteristic such as Java-non Java regions. For education level, another variable was also found significant including education of the society and regional characteristic such as proliferated-non proliferated regions. In general there is a facts and proves that fiscal decentralization improve education access equality, but several effort need to done to optimalize the equalization of primary education access in Indonesia. | en_US |
