| dc.identifier.citation | Blanckaert, K., and Graf, W. H. (2001). ―Mean flow and turbulence in open channel bend.‖ J. Hydr. Engrg, Vol. 127, pp 835 – 847. Cardoso, A. H., Graf, W.H., and Gust, G. (1989). ―Uniform flow in smooth open-channel.‖ J. Hydr. Res., IAHR, 27(5), 603–616. Coleman, N. L. (1981). ―Velocity profiles with suspended sediment.‖ J. Hydr. Res., 19(3), 211–229. Kikkawa, H., Ikeda, S., Ohkawa, H., and Kawamura, Y. (1973). ―Seconday flow in bend of turbulent stream.‖ Proc. Of JSCE, No 219. Kironoto, B.A. and Graf, W.H. (1994). ―Turbulence characteristics in rough uniform open-channel flow.‖ Proc. Inst. Civ. Enggr., 106 (4), UK. Kironoto, B.A. and Graf, W.H. (1995). ―Turbulence characteristics in rough non-uniform open-channel flow.‖ Proc. Inst. Civ. Enggr., 112 (4), UK. Kironoto, B.A., Andoyono, T., Yustiana, F, dan Muharis, C. (2004). ―Kajian Metode Pengambilan Sampel Sedimen Suspensi Sebagai Dasar Penentuan Debit Sedimen Pada Saluran Terbuka.‖ Penelitian Hibah Bersaing XII/1-Th. Anggaran 2004, Lembaga Penelitian, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta. Kironoto, B.A. (2007). ―Penggunaan Metode Clauser Untuk Penentuan Kecepatan Gesek, u*, Pada Saluran Mataram Tampang Segi Empat.‖ Media Teknik, No. 4, Tahun XXIX, Edisi November 2007, No. ISSN 0216- 3012, Yogyakarta. Kironoto, B.A., Yulistiyanto, B., dan Istiarto. (2012). ―Karakteristik Aliran Air Jernih (Clear Water) dan Aliran Sedimen Suspensi (Suspended Sediment) di Belokan Saluran dengan Material Dasar Bergerak (Erodible Bed).‖ Draft Laporan Penelitian LPPM. Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Nezu, I. and Rodi, W. (1986). ―Open channel flow measurements with a laser Doppler anemometer.‖ J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 112(5), 335–355. Reynolds, J. A. (1974). Turbulent flows in engineering. Wiley & S. Ltd., London, Great Britain. Rozovskii, I. L. (1957). Flow of water in bends of open channels. Israel Progamme of Scinetific Translation, Jerussalem. Sumiadi (2012). ―Mekanisme angkutan sedimen dasar pada saluran menikung.‖ Draft Disertasi Doktor, Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Teknik Sipil, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | In a straight open channel flow, the Clauser‘s method, which is based on the measured velocity profile and the
logarithmic velocity law, can be used to determine the wall shear velocity, u*, accurately. For a curved open
channel flow, however, with its complexities, it can be questionable whether the Clauser‘s method can still be
used or not. In this paper, the validity of the Clauser‘s method in a curved channel was evaluated, based on the
inner region data of velocity profiles, plotted in the form of logarithmic coordinate; if the plotted data show linear
correlation, it means that the Clauser‘s method can still be used to determine the wall shear velocity.
Thirty-five of laboratory velocity profiles data obtained from seven different cross-sections of 180-curved
open channel flow, were evaluated to determine the wall shear velocity. The analyses of the measured data
showed that in the beginning of the curved channel, i.e., from the angle of 0 to 30, all of the measured velocity
profiles data were observed still following the logarithmic velocity distribution, either for the measured data
in the middle or in the edge part of the channel. However, starting from the angle of 60 to 180, some of the
data, especially those close to the inner and outer banks of the curved channel, begin to deviate from the logarithmic
law. The deviations become more significant for the larger angle of the curved channel. Nevertheless, in
the middle part of all of the cross sections of the curved channel, there are at least one or two profiles which
still follow the logarithmic velocity distribution, and the friction velocities, thus, can still be calculated by using
the Clauser‘s method with some restrictions. | en_US |
