Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMujiyati
dc.contributor.authorAchyani, Fatchan
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-08T05:53:10Z
dc.date.available2014-08-08T05:53:10Z
dc.date.issued2014-07
dc.identifier.citationAnggraini, FR, Retno, 2006. Pengungkapan Informasi Sosial dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi pengungkapan Informasi Sosial dalam laporan Keuangan Tahunan: (Study Empiris Pada Perusahaan yang Tersaftar di BEJ) Proceedings SNA IX, hal 1-21. Belkaoui, A. and karpik, P.G. 1989. “Determinants of the corporate decision to disclose social information”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vo. 2. No. 1, pp. 36-51. Braco, M.C and Rodrigues, L.L. 2006. “Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks; a legitimacy theory perspective”. Corporate Communications: An International Journal Vol 11 No. 3. Pp. 232-248. Burke, M.C and Rodrigues, L.C.L., 2006, Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility By Portuguese Banks; A Legitimacy Theory Perspective”. Corporate Communications: An International Journal Vol 11 No. 3. Pp. 232-248. Daniri, Achamd. (2008), “Standarisasi Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan”. Dilihat dari 20 Oktober 2010. Darus, F. 2008. Infiuence Of Institute Pressure And Ouwnwrship Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Interdisiplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research in Bussines, 1 (5), 123-150. Ghozali, I. 2006. Statistik Non-Parametik: Teori dan Aplikasi dengan Program SPSS. BP. Undip. Semarang. GRI (2002). “Sustainability Reportim Guidelines, Global Reporting Initiative, London. www. Globalreporting.org dilihat tanggai 30 September 2010. GRI (2002). „Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Global Reporting Initiativa, London. www.global reporting.org dilihat tanggal 30 September 2010. http://www.bi.go.id/web/id+dan + Publik/CSR/Berita.htm. (2007). “Apa dan Mengapa Program Corporate Sosial Resposibility (CSR) bank Indonesia”. Hackson, D and Milne, M. J. 2006. Some Determinant Of Social And Environmental Disclosure In New Xealand Companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9 (1) 77-108. Ikantan Akuntan Indonesia. 2007. Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan No. 101-106. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Ja‟far S., Muhammad dan Arifah, Dista Amalia. 2006. ‘Pengaruh Dorongan Manajemen Lingkungan, Manajemen Lingkungan Proaktif dan Kinerja Lingkungan terhadap Public Envioronmental Reporting. Disampaikan di Simposium nasional Akuntansi 9 Padang. Jensen, Michael, C., Meckling Williem H. 1976. “Theoy of firm: Behavior Managemnt, agency Cost, and Ownershhip Structure, Journal of Economic 3, hal. 305-360. Khan Md. H.U.Z. 2010. “The Effect of Corporate Governance Elements on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)”. Lanros P. 2001. Equator principles or how I learned to stop worrying and usutainability, Impact assessment and project Appraisal, 27 (1). Nugroho, A. 2002. “Corporate Sosial Responsibility”. http://www.hukumonline.com /2002/04/25. Oktapiyani. 2009. Pengaruh Penerapan Good Corporate Governance terhadap Likuiditas perbankan Nasional. http://google.com Rahmawani dan Hartanti, Dwi. 2010. Pengaruh Budaya dan Sosial Politik dalam tampilan Situs Laporan Pertanggungjawaban sosial Perusahaan: Studi Perbandingan Perusahaan Migas Indonesia dan Perusahaan Migas Amerika Serikat, Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XII, Purwokerto, Hal 1-42. Rahman, Arief dan Wisyasari, Karunia Nur. 2008. The Analisys of Company Characteristic Influence Toward CSR Disclosure: Empirical Evidence of Manufacturing Companies Listed in JSX, JAAI Volume 12 No. 1 Hal 25. Suciyati. Pelaksanaan Corporate Sosial Responsibility dalam hubungannya dengan Pelaksanaan Good Corporate Governance. http://google.comen_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-602-70429-1-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/4675
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to identify the reporting practices of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the conventional banks in Indonesia with reference to CSR disclosure index based on GRI index (2011) which consists of 121 items and analyze the influence of the elements of good corporate Governance (GCG) for the practice of corporate social resposibility (CSR) in the banking industry in Indonesia. The data used is the data obtained from the annual report of the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2009-2011. This study refers to the results of previous studies with different results. The research methodology is a quantitative descriptive study with multiple regression test. Based on the research results of the regression models is known that the Institutional Ownership variables revealed a significant effect for CSR reporting practices in the Indonesian banking industry. Institutional Ownership variable has a Adjusted R Square 0.585 this means that 58.5% variation in the practice of CSR reporting can be explained by the independent variables (Board of Commissioners, Audit Committee and Managerial Ownership), while the remaining 41.5% is explained by other variables outside of the model. While variable Board of Commissioners, Audit Committee and Managerial Ownership had no significant effect on the disclosure of CSR in Indonesian banks.en_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartaen_US
dc.subjectCSRen_US
dc.subjectCorporate Governanceen_US
dc.subjectDisclosureen_US
dc.subjectBanking Industryen_US
dc.titlePengaruh Corporate Governance Terhadap Praktek Pelaporan Corporate Social Responsibility Pada Industri Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record