| dc.identifier.citation | Al-Nsour, M. 2012. “Relationship Between Incentives and Organizational Performance for Employees in the Jordanian University”. International Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 7, No. 1, January 2012, pp.78-89. Chandrasekar, K. 2011. “Workplace Environment and its Impact on Organisational Performance in Public Sector Organisations”. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems. Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2011; hal. 1-19. Condly, S. J.; Clark, R. E.; and Stolovitch, H. D. 2003. “The Effects of Oncentives on Workplace Performance : A Meta-analytic Review of Research Studies”. Performance Improvement Quality. Vol. 16, No. 03, March 2003, pp. 46-64. Ivancevich, J. M.; and Matteson, M. T. 2002. Organizational Behaviour and Management 6th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill. Khan, S. H.; Azhar, Z.; Parveen, S.; Naeem, F.; and Sohail, M. M. 2011. “Exploring the Impact of Infrastructure, Pay Incentives, and Workplace Environment on Employees Performance (A Case Study of Sargodha University)”. Asian Journal of Empirical Research. Vol. 2, No. 1, April 2011 pp. 118-140. Kreitner, R.; and Kinicki, A. 2004. Organizational Behaviour, 6th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill. Sekaran, U.; and Bougie, R. 2010. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach 5th Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. Yavuz, N. 2004. The Use of Non-Monetary Incentives as A Motivational Tool: A Survey Study In A Public Organization In Turkey. Magister Thesis. Middle East Technical University. Zandin, K. B. 2001. Maynard’s Industrial Engineering Handbook 5th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Employee is one of the main assets that support the success of an organization, so their performance will affect performance of the organization as a whole. This study aims to evaluate the application and determine the effect of incentive systems and other factors on job performance. Methods of data collection in this study consists of literature review, interviews and collecting questionnaires. A total of 103 questionnaires distributed to nonacademic employees at an educational institution. Data processing in this study, among others, evaluation of incentives satisfaction, correlation test using Pearson and Partial Least Squares (PLS) to predict the relationship between the variables. The results showed that salaries are the most important priority to be obtained at work. Relationships between variables in terms of a significant correlation between the variable conditions of employment, the willingness achievers, and incentives for job performance variables. In the design of the proposed incentives, provision of incentives aimed at increasing productivity and work motivation, maintaining equality and feasibility at incentives, and maintaining the welfare of employees. In addition, the design of proposed incentives gives adjustment to the amount of family allowance, responsibility allowance, general allowance, as well as performance benefits. | en_US |
