Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBuchari
dc.contributor.authorHaikal Karana
dc.contributor.authorTambunan, Mangara
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T08:05:29Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T08:05:29Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-04
dc.identifier.citation[1] Mat Zin. S, Ismail. F. Employers’ BehaviouralSafety Compliance Factors towardOccupational, Safety and Health Improvement in the Construction Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences Vol-36. Pp. 742-752. Bandung. June 2011. [2] McDonald, N., Hrymak, V. (2003). Safety Behaviour in the Construction Sector, Report of Health and Safety Authority, Dublin & the Health and Safety Executive, Northern Ireland, 182. [3]Khdair AWameedh. Shamsudin M Faridahwati. Subramanim. C. Improving safety performance by understanding relationship between management practices and leadership behaviour in the oil and gas industry in iraq: a proposed model. International Conference on Management and Artificial IntelligenceIPEDR vol.6. 2011. [4]Ardana, I Komang.,Mujiati, Ni Wayan., Utama, I WayanMudiartha., Manajemensumber DayaManusia, GrahaIlmu [5]Moekijat. 2010. ManajemenSumberDayaManusia. Bandung: MandarMaju. [6]Syartini, Titi. Penerapan SMK3 dalamupayapencegahankecelakaankerja di PT. Indofood CBPSuksesMakmurDivisi Noodle Semarang. 2010. [7]Mangkunegara, DR. A.A. Anwar Prabu. EvaluasiKinerja SDM. Bandung: PenerbitRefikaAditama. 2005. [8] Fernando, Y., Z, S., Janbi, L. (2008). The Determinant Factors of Safety Compliance at Petrochemical Processing Area: ModeratorEffects of Employees Experience and Engineering Background, Proceedings of the 9th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference,1442-1452. [9] B. Fahlbruch, “Integrating Human Factors in Safety and Reliability Approaches,” 4th European American Workshop on Reliability of NDE - Th.4.A.1, 2010. [10] B. Fabiano, F. Curr, and R. Pastorino, “A study of the relationship between Occupational injuries and firm size and type in the Italianindustry,” Safety Science, voI. 42, 587– 600, 2004. [11] I.K.Rachmawati. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Pe-nerbit : ANDI Yogyakarta (2008) [12] R. Krause and R. Russell, “The behaviour-based approach to proactive accident Investigation,” Professional Safety, vol.39,1994. [13]Vijayakumar, T. (2007). Achieve total Safety Culture through Behaviour Based Safety, Proceeding of the 10th Conference andExhibition of National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Malaysia, 303-313 [14]Mahmood, R., Mohd Isa, M.F., Mustafa, M., Abdul Aziz, F.S., Salleh, A. (2010). Safety Behaviour:The Role of Safety Commitment. [15] Johnson, S.E. (2003). Behavioural safety theory: Understanding the theoretical foundation. Journal of Professional Safety, 48 (10). [16]Glendon, A.I., Litherland, D.K., (2001). Safety Climate Factors, Group Differences and Safety Behaviour in Road Construction,Journal of Safety sciences, 39, 157-188. [17]EndroyonoBambang, Faktor-faktor yang berperanterhadappeningkatansikapkeselamatandankes ehatankerja para pelakujasakonstruksi di Semarang. JurnalTeknikSipildanPerencanaanNomor 2, Vol-12, pp 111-120. 2012 [18]EndroyonoBambang, Faktor-faktor yang berperanterhadappeningkatansikapkeselamatandankes ehatankerja para pelakujasakonstruksi di Semarang. JurnalTeknikSipildanPerencanaanNomor 2, Vol-12, pp 111-120. 2012 [19] Notoatmodjo, S., IlmuKesehatanMasyarakat :Prinsip-PrinsipDasar, PT. RinekaCipta, Jakarta 1997. [20] Schuler, Randall, S., and Susan E. Jackson, ManajemenSumberDayaManusia: Menghadapi Abad Ke-21, Jilid 2, EdisiKeenam, PenerbitAirlangga, Jakarta,1999.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2407-4330
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/4989
dc.description.abstractHuman has put the major concerns to safety and health in order to minimize adverse effect that resulted from work and work surrounding. Furthermore, manufacturing technology has succeeded to decrease the risk of machinery and work surrounding whichcause bad effect to human. However, this change becomes ineffective when the human have bad behaviour in workplace. Many research have shown that the human error have caused the majority of accident in workplace. This human error resulted from bad behaviour which has been implemented by worker. University as the place to form the behaviour of educated people in the world, has had the responsibility to promote safety and health in workplace. But, the fact describe that the university does not promote safety and health in university surrounding. This was proven by many accidents like fire, body injuries and sick related to work happened in university surrounding. As the result, many educated people who were graduated from university have bad behaviour in workplace. This research was taken in laboratory under industrial engineering department. Laboratory as the place to practice the theory which learned in the class has many potential hazard. Based on the preliminary research, many students did not realize the potential hazard. The methodology of this research is used laboratory as object of research. There are 8 laboratories under industrial engineering where all the assistant will be measured their behaviour.The research focused on general safety and health, ergonomic hazard, mechanical hazard, electrical hazard, extreme temperature hazard, fire hazard, noise and vibration hazard and fall, accelerated object, vision hazard.en_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartaen_US
dc.subjectOccupational Safety Healthen_US
dc.subjectStudent Behaviour,en_US
dc.subjectLaboratory assistanten_US
dc.subjectBehaviour Ratingen_US
dc.titleIdentification TheBehaviour of Laboratory Assistant As the Effort To Develop Safety And Health In University (Study Cases In Laboratory Under Industrial Engineering Department, University of North Sumatera)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record