Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVitasari, Denny
dc.contributor.authorGrassia, Paul
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-05T01:17:32Z
dc.date.available2014-12-05T01:17:32Z
dc.date.issued2014-11-25
dc.identifier.citation[1] R. Miller, D. O. Grigorief, E. V. Aksenenko, S. A. Zholob, M. E. Leser, M. Michel, and V. B. Fainerman,“Thermodynamic and adsorption kinetic studies of protein + surfactant mixtures,” in Food colloids: interaction, microstructure and processing (E. Dickinson, ed.), pp. 120–130, Cambridge: RoyalSociety of Chemistry, 2005. [2] R. Miller, V. B. Fainerman, A. V. Makievski, J. Krägel, and R. Wüstneck, “Adsorption characteristics of mixed monolayers of a globular protein and a non-ionic surfactant,” Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 151–157, 2000. [3] V. S. Alahverdjieva, K. Khristov, D. Exerowa, and R. Miller, “Correlation between adsorption isotherms, thin liquid films and foam properties of protein/surfactant mixtures: Lysozyme/C10DMPO and lysozyme/SDS,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 323,pp. 132–138, 2008. [4] V. B. Fainerman, S. A. Zholob, M. Leser, M. Michel, and R. Miller, “Competitive adsorption from mixed nonionic surfactant/protein solutions,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 274, no. 2, pp. 496–501, 2004. [5] R. Miller, V. B. Fainerman, M. E. Leser, and M. Michel, “Kinetics of adsorption of proteins and surfactants,” Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 350–356, 2004. [6] C. Kotsmar, V. Pradines, V. S. Alahverdjieva, E. V. Aksenenko, V. B. Fainerman, V. I. Kovalchuk, J. Krägel, M. E. Leser, B. A. Noskov, and R. Miller, “Thermodynamics, adsorption kinetics and rheology of mixed protein-surfactant interfacial layers,” Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 150, pp. 41–54, 2009. [7] C. Kotsmar, E. V. Aksenenko, V. B. Fainerman, V. Pradines, J. Krägel, and R. Miller, “Equilibrium and dynamics of adsorption of mixed _-casein/surfactant solutions at the water/hexane interface,” Colloidsand Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 354, no. 1–3, pp. 210–217, 2010. [8] V. Pradines, V. B. Fainerman, E. V. Aksenenko, J. Krägel, R. Wüstneck, and R. Miller, “Adsorption of Protein-surfactant complexes at the water/oil interface,” Langmuir, vol. 27, pp. 965–971, 2011. [9] V. B. Fainerman, E. H. Lucassen-Reynders, and R. Miller, “Description of the adsorption behaviour of proteins at water/fluid interfaces in the framework of a two-dimensional solution model,” Advancesin Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 106, no. 1–3, pp. 237–259, 2003. [10] R. Z. Guzman, R. G. Carbonell, and P. K. Kilpatrick, “The adsorption of proteins to gas-liquid interfaces,”Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 536–547, 1986. [11] C. H. Chang and E. I. Franses, “Adsorption dynamics of surfactants at the air/water interface: A critical review of mathematical models, data, and mechanisms,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemicaland Engineering Aspects, vol. 100, pp. 1–45, 1995. [12] A. F. H. Ward and L. Tordai, “Time-dependence of boundary tensions of solutions I. The role of diffusion in time-effects,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 453–461, 1946. [13] R. A. Leonard and R. Lemlich, “A study of interstitial liquid flow in foam. Part I. Theoretical model and application to foam fractionation,” AIChE J., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 1965. [14] M. Mulqueen, K. J. Stebe, and D. Blankschtein, “Dynamic interfacial adsorption in aqueous surfactantmixtures: Theoretical study,” Langmuir, vol. 17, pp. 5196–5207, 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2339-028X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/5043
dc.description.abstractThe dynamics of adsorption of mixed protein-surfactant on a bubble surface is simulated mathematically.The model for the adsorption dynamics is developed based on the Ward-Tordai equation combined with the Frumkin adsorption isotherm. The simultaneous equations are solved using the Newton method for iteration. Base case adsorption and diffusion parameter values for the simulation were sourced from literature. It was found that protein arrives on the surface at a later time than surfactant. At this later time, the protein replaces the surfactant resulting in depletion of surfactant on the surface. There is, however, less protein adsorbed in the presence of more surfactant in the bulk. In contrast, more protein stays in the subsurface layer under these conditions. In addition to the base case simulation and a comparison to the experimental data available in the literature, a parametric study was performed to explore the effects of varying adsorption and diffusion parameters. The parametric study varying the protein surface affinity revealed that below a certain critical affinity, protein tends not to replace surfactant on the surface, even though the affinity of protein remains higher than that of surfactant. Therefore, protein molecules need to have sufficiently high affinity to displace surfactant molecules from the surface. Another parametric study setting a fixed protein surface affinity and varying relative diffusivity and surface affinity of surfactant (for a specified maximum possible surface capacity of surfactant) concluded that with high relative diffusivity and low surfactant affinity (relative to protein), the displacement of surfactant on the surface is more likely to occur.en_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartaen_US
dc.subjectadsorptionen_US
dc.subjectmixed protein-surfactanten_US
dc.subjectfrumkin isothermen_US
dc.subjectWard-Tordai equationen_US
dc.titleSimulation of Dynamics of Adsortion Of Mixed Protein-Surfactant on A Bubble Surfaceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record