| dc.identifier.citation | Biggs, J. 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at University The Society for Research in Higher Education/Open University Press. Brabrand, C. And Andersen, J. 2006. Teaching and Understanding Aarhus University Press. University of Aarhus, Denmark. Brown, Douglas. 2001. TEACHING by PRINCIPLES an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, Second Edition, San Francisco State University. Cunningham Florez, M. 1999. Improving adult English language learners' speaking skills. ERIC Digest, June 1999. (ED425304). National Centre for ESL. Dale, P. Wolf C. J. Speech Communication Made Simple A. Multicultural Perspective, Second Edition Longman, Inc, all right reserved. Miami Dade Community college Lee, James F, Bill V. P. 1995. Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen, New York: McGraw-Hill. Mursid Saleh, Prof. PhD. 1998. Curriculum Approaches and Definitions, English Department Program – FKIP – UNNES – Semarang. Richard, Jack C and Theodore S Rodgers, 2001, Approaches and Methods In Language Teaching, Second Edition, Cambridge University press I.S.P. Nation and John Macalister Language Curriculum Design, First published 2010 by Rutledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 simultaneously published in the UK by Rutledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN English Language Syllabus. 2001, for Primary and secondary Schools, Curriculum Planning and Development Division, Ministry of Education, Singapore, 2001 J. A Van EK and J.L.M Trim, 1998, Threshold 1990, Council of Europe, Cambridge University Press- United Kingdom. Kementrian Pendidikan Malaysia. 1998. Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran, Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Rendah, Bahasa Inggris. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. Lee, James F, Bill V. P. 1995. Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen, New York: McGraw-Hill. Richard, Jack C and Theodore S Rodgers. 2001. Approaches and Methods In Language Teaching, Second Edition, Cambridge University press. Todd, E. A. 1965.Curriculum Development and Instructional Planning. Nederland Ind School District, Pg. 2. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The main target and aims of this writing are: to show that curriculum is a dynamic system, therefore, it can be developed to follow the era progressing, the need and level of our students. It is to show that curriculum is excellent and accurate guiding for the successfull of teaching learning process. Better we make curriculum will be better and greater the result of education. Above all, character building is the most important target of curriculum and education. There are a lot of aspects in curriculum that should be learned carefully and seriously. Therfore, the government/Education Minister should be smart in making curriculum design that is good, accurate, and suitable for our students, if not, they will make a big mistake in taking decision, so the impacts will be scarry for the future generation. | en_US |
