dc.identifier.citation | [1] Gunterus, Frans. 1994, Falsafah Dasar: Sistem Pengendalian Proses, jakarta. PT. Elex Media Komputindo.. [2] Wang, L. X. 1997, A Course in Fuzzy Systems and Control, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International. Inc: pp. 257- 263. [3] M. Depenbrok, IEEE Trans, On Power Electronics 3 (1988) 420. [4] J.M Jacob, Industrial Control Electronics Application and Design, Prentise Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1988. [5] Y. S. Lai, Proceedings of the IEEE PES Winter Meeting, 1999, p.47 [6] C.T Lin, C.S Lee, Neural Fuzzy Systems, Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1996 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | BLDC motors are widely used in many industrial applications because of its high efficiency,
high torque and low noise volume. BLDC motor speed control is a complex process. But
complexity is made comparable to the performance of the BLDC motor is high. Conventional
PID control proved to be able to show good performance in controlling the specific loading on
the plant. But any changes in the load of the plant, conventional PID control should be re-set
the parameters kp, ki and kd to target steady state according to the desired set point. The
purpose of this study is to design equipment for the control of BLDC motor that can
automatically tune the PID parameters by fuzzy logic. In the present study used a RISC AVR
microcontroller as the control center. While the software is used for algorithm programming
PID control and PID-fuzzy hybrid control in C language. In order to tune the proper PID
parameters in real time, then made a two-level control system. The first level to determine the
parameters of PID by finding the minimum and maximum value of kp, ki and kd the reaction
curve method. The second level designing fuzzy systems in order to automatically tune PID
reinforcement, then formulated into a combination of 49 fuzzy if-then rules to get the value of
kp, ki and kd right of errors and changes in the value of delta error. Testing changes in set point
and load changes resulting response characteristics of conventional PID control systems with
an average value that is the rise time (tr) 0.025 seconds, the preset time (ts) 0.1625 seconds,
amounting to 15.98% overshoot. While control Hybrid PID Fuzzy resulting average value of the
rise time (tr) 0.0025 seconds, the preset time (ts) 0.057 seconds, overshoot at 5.42%. | en_US |