| dc.identifier.citation | Anggraini, Y. dan Puranta, B. H. 2001. Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja: Penyusunan APBD Secara Komprehensif. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN. BAPPENAS.2003.Peta Kemampuan Propinsi Dalam Era Otonomi Daerah:Tinjauan atas Kinerja PAD dan Upaya yang Dilakukan Daerah.Direktorat Pengembangan Otonomi Daerah. Bisma I Dewa Gde.Susanto Hery.2010.Evaluasi Kinerja Keuangan Daerah pemerintah provinsi nusa tenggara barat tahun anggaran 2003- 2007.Jurnal Ekonomi Ganec Swara.Volume 4,Nomer 3 (Desember 2010) hal.75-86. Darise, Nurlan.2006.Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah.Gorontalo:Indeks. Halim, A.2001.Bunga Rampai Manajemen Keungan Daerah.Bunga Rampai Manajemen Keungan Daerah.Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN. Hidayat Paidi dkk.2007.Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Kabupaten/Kota Pemerkasan Di Sumatera Utara.Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangungan.Volume 12 No.13 (Desember 2007) hal.213-222. Mahmudi.2011.Akuntansi Sektor Publik.Yogyakarta:UII Press. Rinaldi Udin.2012.Kemandirian Keuangan Dalam Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah.Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik.Volume 8 Nomor 2 (Juni 2012) hal.105-113. Suparmoko.2001.Ekonomi Publik Untuk Keuangan Daerah Dalam Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta:Andi. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 33 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perimbangan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah. Wulandari, A.2001.Kemampuan Keuangan Daerah: Studi Kasus Kota Jambi dalam Pelaksanaan otonomi Daerah.Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik.Volume 5, Nomor 2 (November 2001) hal.17-33. Yuwono, Sony dkk.2008.Memahami APBD dan Permasalahannya (Panduan Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah).Malang:Bayumedia Publishing. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose of the research titled “Evaluation of Local Finance of Pekalongan residency of 2007-
2011” is to analyze performance and capability of local finance of Pekalongan residency of
2007-2011. The research uses secondary data. Performance of local finance can be measured
by using fiscal decentralization level, regional dependency level and regional independency
level, whereas the mapping of local budget is measured by using local financial index and
quadrant method. Resulth of the research indicated that Pekalongan Town, Batang regency,
Pekalongan regency, Tegal regency and Brebes regency had very inadequate decentralization
level, Tegal Town had inadequate fiscal decentralization. Seven regencies of Pekalongan
residency had high dependency of level to central goverment. Tegal town belonged to adequate
category had better independency level than other region. Further, Pekalongan town, Pemalang
regency, Pekalongan regency were belonged to inadequate category, while Batang regency,
Tegal regency and Brebes regency were grouped in very poor category. Pekalongan Town,
Batang regency, Tegal town, Tegal regency and Pemalang regency had high index of local
financial capability, whereas Brebes and Pekalongan regency had moderate index of local
financial capability. Analysis of quadrant methode concludes regions of Pekalongan regency
were not found to belong to quadrant I. There were three regions (Pekalongan town, Batang
regency and Pekalongan regency) belonged to quadrant II. One region (Tegal town) was
found in quadrant III, and three regions (Pemalang regency, Tegal regency and Brebes
regency) were found in quadrant IV. | en_US |
