| dc.identifier.citation | Depdikbud, 2012. Kebijakan Pengembangan Profesi Guru, Jakarta: Pusbangprogdi. Echols J. M. dan Hassan Shadily, 1987, Kamus Inggris Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia. Edith Kiggundu, and Samuel Nayimuli, 2009, Teaching practice: a make or break phase for student teachers, South African Journal of Education,Copyright © 2009 EASA Vol 29: P. 345-358 FKIP-UMS, 2012. Program Pengalaman Lapangan, Surakarta: Laboratorium Fakultas. FKIP-UMS,2013. Buku Pedoman FKIP, Surakarta: FKIP-UMS. Helena Orrje, TT, The Incidence of OF ON-THE-JOB TRAINING, An Empirical Study using Swedish Data, Sweden: Swedish Institute for Social Research Stockholm University S-106 91 Stockholm P. 1-25. Hisyam Zaini dkk., 2002. Desain Pembelajaran, Yogyakarta: CTSD IAIN Yogyakarta. Kathleen Stassen Berger Theory and Practice: Teachingin the Real World THE NEA HIGHER EDUCATION JOURNAL 107,P. 107-116 Marie Tejero Hughes & Diana Martinez Valle Riestra, 2012 , Early Childhood Special Education: Insights from Educators and Families, International Journal of Education, ISSN 1948- 5476 2012, Vol. 4, No. 2 P. 59-73. Mamduh M. Hanafi, 1997, Manajemen, Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN. Mulyadi dan Johny Setyawan, 2001, Sistem Perencanaan dan Pengendalian Manajemen, Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 74 Tahun 2008 tetang Guru. Suharsimi Arikunto, 2008, Manajemen Pendidikan, Yogyakarta: Aditya Media. T. Hani Handoko, 1994, Manajemen, Yogyakarta: BPFE. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. UNY, 2007. Panduan Praktik Pengalaman Lapangan, Yogyakarta: FIP-UNY UPI,tt. Panduan Praktek Kependidikan(PPK), Bandung: UPT PPL. Victorian Institute of Teaching, 2013. Standards For Graduating Teachers. W. Qazi, K. J. Rawat, M. Y Sharjeel, and MS Shila DeviI, 2009, Teacher Perception About Implementation Strategy Of B.Ed Teaching Practice In Real School Classrooms: Issues and Challenges, The S.U. Jour. of Ed. Vol. XXXVIII, 2008-09, Pp. 54-76. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The purposes of this study are threefolds: a. Describe the management of PPL of PGSD
FKIP-UMS conducted so far. b. Formulate the management of model PGSD FKIP PPLUMS
in accordance with the demands of competence. c. Describe the policies that should
be done so that the PPL management of PGSD FKIP-UMS match with the needs of
stakeholders. The type of the research is qualitative research with design phenomenology.
The experiment is conducted in the Faculty of Teacher trainning of UMS, School of partners/
where PPL isconducted and associated institutions. The sources of the data are in the
form of guidelines for the implementation of PGSD PPL and PPL documents and resource
activities. The data collection techniques using the techniques of documentation,
observation, and interviews as well as a forum group discussion (FGD). The data are
analyzed critically. Critical analysis is conducted are a flow includes the steps of data
reduction, data display and conclusion. The validity of the data is done by triangulation of
methods and sources and do forum group discussion (FGD). The results of the study can
be stated as follows : 1. PPL PGSD management : a. implemented by the management
unit of PPL, b. PPL management of model of FKIP PGSD-UMS can be broadly grouped
into two, namely : 1). PPL programmed, and 2). PPL independent. c. PPL program is
intended for regular students, implemented in semester VII, and PPL Independent of PSKGJ
for students/students who have become teachers, implemented according to the needs. d.
PPL in the curriculum of PGSD FKIP-UMS is an integral part in preparing the prospective
students as professional teachers. e. PPL PGSD FKIP-UMS is more emphasied on
the practice of schooling and learning practices. 2. PPL PGSD model was promoted “Model
Pengelolaan Terpadu/Kolaboratif”, PGSD FKIP-UMS relationship with partner school
not only in implement PPL stage. But since PGSD Curriculum development, implementation
PPL to reporting stage. 3. policies that should be done PGSD FKIP-UMS are : a. It
has “Laboratorium School”; b. PPL financing should include comprehensive activities;
c. election partner school with more emphasis on teacher competence oficials than school
acreditation. | en_US |
