| dc.identifier.citation | Atiya Inayatullah dan Palwasha Jehangir. 2011. Teacher’s Job Performance: The Role of Motivation.International Journal of Education, 2011, Vol. 3, No. 2: E4. Ankara: Macrothink institute. Belle, Louis Jinot. 2007. The Role of Secondary School Principals In Motivating Teachers In The Flacq District of Mauritius. Education Management at the University Of South Africa (http://uir.unisa.ac.za). Diakses 25 Desember 2012. Hikmat. 2009. Manajemen Pendidikan. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia. Ibrahim, A. S. & Al-Teneiji, S. 2012. Principal leadership style, school performance, and principal effectiveness in Dubai schools. International Journal of Research Studies in Education. January 2013, Volume 2 Number 1, 41-54. Kreitner dan Kinicki. 2008. Organizational behavior 10th edition. Thomson South-Western. Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Moeheriono. 2012. Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. Purwanto, M. Ngalim. 2009. Administrasi dan Supervisi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya. Semueil, I. Wayan. 2011. Hubungan Gaya Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dengan Motivasi Kerja Guru SMK Negeri Manado. ED VOKASI, Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan. Volume 2, Nomor 2, hal 83-97, Sept. 2011 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This research aims to examine (1) the contribution level of leadership and
communication of school principal on the teachers’ performance through their motivation,
(2) the contribution
level of principal’s
leadership and
communication on teachers’
work
motivation, and (3) the contribution level of teachers’
work motivation on their
performance.
This research
uses
quantitative
approach.
Population
used
in
this research
was
taken from
elementary school teachers in UPT
Dinas Dikpora, Jebres
District, Surakarta:
from
the total number 762 teachers, 262 teachers were
selected as the samples.
The
data were
collected by using questionnaire.
Path data analysis technique used in this
research.
These are
the research
results.(1)There
is no any contribution of school principal’s
leadership and communication on the teachers’
performance through
their motivation,
with result
criteria< x = 0,035 <(0,405 x 0,238) = 0,035 < 0,096, There
is indirect
Relationship pattern and > x = 0,161>(0,405 x 0,202) = 0,161 > 0,082, there is direct
relationship pattern. (2) There is a positive contribution of the school principal’s leadership
and
communication
on teachers’
work
motivation;
the result
of
>,
is
23,756
>
2,639
with
significant
value
<
0,05;
0,000.
(3)
There
is
a
positive
contribution
of
teachers’
work
motivation
on their performance; the t-test analysis shows that 6,922 is >1,989 with p
value
(significance) <0,05, yaitu 0,000. | en_US |
