dc.contributor.author | Santoso, Broto | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-06T09:21:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-03-06T09:21:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Berman HM., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat TN., Weissig H., Ilya N. Shindyalov IN. and Bourne PE. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucl. Acids Res., 28 (1): 235-242. DOCK6.6 (2013). University of California at San Francisco; San Francisco, CA. O'Boyle N., Banck M., James C., Morley C., Vandermeersch T. and Hutchison G. 2011. Open Babel: An Open Chemical Toolbox. Journal of Cheminformatics, 3(1): 33. Pettersen EF., Goddard TD., Huang CC., Couch GS., Greenblatt DM., Meng EC. and Ferrin TE. 2004. UCSF Chimera--a Visualization System for Exploratory Research and Analysis. J. Comput. Chem., 25(13): 1605-12. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11617/5318 | |
dc.description.abstract | Database of natural medicinal compounds, primarily derived from plants are widely available,
distributed and can be accessed for free via the Internet. The protein database that is
responsible for a particular disease in molecular biology also has been established since 1971.
Limited access of information on results of Indonesian research, repeatability of objects and
topics of research are often the case, extract and fraction of medicinal plant resulted nonselective
conclusion of target activity of disease, the lack of advanced research that gained
successful outcome due to a very few in number of pure isolates that obtained from certain
plants and many other difficulties that will be found in the development of Indonesian medicinal
compounds. The insufficiency of research funding given decreased the amount of research
and increased competition to get so as to the preliminary studies using prediction theory
through computational chemistry is needed to rise the accomplishment of research, one of
them is the virtual screening using docking tools. This study aimed to compare the docking
tools is available for free. The parameters of comparison are simplicity of use, easiness of
access to information, advantages and disadvantages for the novice user, the system that
must be prepared, speediness for obtaining and analysing the results and the level of
confidentiality. MarvinSketch and OpenBabel are main software that needed for supporting
Docking tools. The selected docking tools must be available free for use online or offline. The
use of online docking tools that provided by a third-party does not meet the desired level of
confidentiality. Dock6, Dock3.7 and PLANTS are not stress-free in the installation or the
docking procedure because it needs further experience concerning computer systems. PyRx,
Chimera, MarvinSpace or VegaZZ could be selected as a candidate docking tools. They have
an easy setup and operation as well as their trustworthy because they can be run offline.
Chimera and PyRx recommended as docking tool that have to be used because it has the
following advantages: both can be run on any operating system (Windows, Mac or Linux) and
fulfil all the requirement. Application of database of natural medicinal compounds and protein
targets using docking tool: Chimera and PyRx should be recommended by the Indonesian
government in order to become standard procedure of research before performing a certain
activity assay of the plant as early prediction approaching the results to be acquired. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta | en_US |
dc.subject | Free Docking Tools | en_US |
dc.subject | Chimera | en_US |
dc.subject | PyRx | en_US |
dc.subject | Dock6 | en_US |
dc.subject | PLANTS | en_US |
dc.subject | MarvinSpace | en_US |
dc.subject | VegaZZ | en_US |
dc.subject | online | en_US |
dc.subject | offline | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of Free Docking Tools | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |