| dc.identifier.citation | The Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945 and Its Amendments The Constitution of Malaysia, 1957/1963 The Laws of the Constitution of Negeri Sembilan, 1959. Decree of MPR No. II/MPR/1993 on the Broad Outlines of State Policy. Law No. 32 of 2004 on the Local Government Law No. 11 of 2006 on the Aceh Governance Federation of Malaya Constitutional Commission. Report of the Commission for the Federation of Malaya Constitutional. London: Colonial No. 330, HMSO, 1957. Badan Pekerja MPR. Perubahan Pertama dan Perubahan Kedua UUD 1945: Bahan Penjelasan BP-MPR dalam Rangka Memasyarakatkan Hasil Sidang Umum MPR 1999 dan Sidang Tahunan MPR 1999. Jakarta: Sekretariat MPR, 2000. Austin, John. The Province of Jurisprudence. Edited by H.L.A. Hart .London: George Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1954. Awang, Muhammad Kamil. The Sultan and the Constitution. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka, 1998. Azhari, Aidul Fitriciada. UUD 1945 sebagai Revolutiegrondwet Tafsir Poskolonial atas Gagasan-gagasan Revolusioner dalam Wacana Konstitusi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2011. Azhari, Aidul Fitriciada. The Essential of the 1945 Constitution and the Agreement of the Amandment of the 1945 Constitution: A Comparison of the Constitutional Amandment¸ Jurnal Hukum 18 (2011): 305-319. Gullick, John. Malaysia: Economic Expansion and National Unity. London: Ernest Benn, 1981. Habermas, Jurgen. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, Mass. : The MIT Press, 1999. Hatta, Muhammad. “Ke Arah Indonesia Merdeka.” In Masalah Kenegaraan, edited by Miriam Budiardjo. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1977. Hooker, M.B.. Reading in Malay Adat Laws. Singapore: Singapore University Press, 1970. Huda, Miftakhul et al.. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Book IV. Jakarta: Sekretariat MKRI, 2010. Jewa, Tunku Sofiah, Salleh Buang & Yaacob Hussain Merican eds.. Tun Mohammed Suffian’s An Introduction to the Constitution fo Malaysia. Selangor My: Pasifica Publication, 2007. Kartodirdjo, Sartono. “From Ethno-Nationalism to the “Indonesia Merdeka” Movement 1908-1925,” In Nationalism and Cultural Revival in Southeast Asia: Perspectives from the Centre and the Region, edited by Sri Kuhnt-Saptodewo, Volker Grabowsky, dan Martin Grosheim. Wiesbaden : Harrasowitz, 1997. Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. New York: Russel & Russel, 1973. Kusuma, RM. A.B.. Lahirnya Undang-Undang Dasat 1945. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2004. Lombard, Denys. Nusa Jawa: Silang Budaya III Warisan-warisan Kerajaan Konsentris. Translated by Winarsih Partainingrat Arifin, Rahayu S. Hidayat, Nini Hidayati Yusuf. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2008. Nasroen, M. Dasar Falsafah Minangkabau. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1971. Noer, Deliar. “Perkembangan Demokrasi Kita.” In Demokrasi dan Proses Politik, edited by Amien Rais. Jakarta; LP3ES, 1986. Popper, Karl. Conjectures and Refutations. London/New York: Routledge, 2007. Rambe, Safrizal. Sarekat Islam Pelopor Bangkitnya Nasionalisme Indonesia 1905-1942. Jakarta: Yayasan Kebangkitan Insan Cendekia, 2008. Rothermund, Dietmar. “Nationalism and the Reconstruction of Traditions in Asia.” In Nationalism and Cultural Revival in Southeast Asia: Perspectives from the Centre and the Region, edited by Sri Kuhnt-Saptodewo, Volker Grabowsky, dan Martin Grosheim. Wiesbaden : Harrasowitz, 1997. Samad, YB Datuk Abdul. “Kemurnian dalam Adat Perpatih.” In Kertas Kerja Seminar Persejarahan dan Adat Perpatih, Negeri Sembilan: Majelis Belia Negeri, 1974. Siddik, Abdullah. Pengantar Undang-Undang Adat di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit University Malaya, 1975. Soekarno. Res Publica Sekali Lagi Res Publica. Jakarta: Kementrian Penerangan RI, 1959. Windstedt, R.O.. The Malays: A Cultural History. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul, 1950. | in_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | The study focuses to compare the ideas, norms, and practices of the reconstruction of
statecraft tradition between Indonesian and Malaysian constitutional legal system.
Conceptually, there are two model of reconstruction of tradition in the constitution, namely
the particular-absolute and the particular-relative. The first emphasizes on the absolute
aspects of genuine tradition, which essentially different from the values of modern state. The
later stresses more on relative aspects of the proper genuine tradition with the values of
modern state. Historically, before the amendment of the Indonesian Constitution, the
reconstruction of tradition was practiced based on particular absolute model, while after the
constitutional amendment tends to reject to reconstruct the tradition at the national structure,
but recognize the traditions at local structure. Generally, it can be concluded that the
amendment of the Indonesian Constitution does not have an obvious pattern of reconstruction
of tradition. It contradicts with the original meaning of the Indonesian founders, who
obviously believed tradition as a basic to create a national constitutional system. Meanwhile,
Malaysia has been practicing reconstruction of tradition based on particular relative model by
applying the perpatih tradition in the Malaysian elected monarch system. | in_ID |
