Show simple item record

Implikasi dan Daya Saing Daerah Terhadap Pembangunan Wilayah Jawa Tengah

dc.contributor.authorSoebagiyo, Daryono
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-12T02:25:54Z
dc.date.available2015-05-12T02:25:54Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.identifier.citationAdams, N., Alden, J. and Harris, N. 2006. Regional development dan spatial planning in an enlarged european union, Aldershot: Ashgate. Adisasmita, Rahardjo. 2008. Pengembangan wilayah: Konsep dan teori. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Graha Ilmu. Anselin, L., Syabri, I. and Kho, Y. 2006. GeoDa: An Introduction to Spatial Data Analysis. Geographical Analysis. Vol. 38 (1): 5 – 22. Armstrong, H., and Taylor, J. 2000. Regional Economics and Policy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Barro, Robert J., and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 1999. Economic growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Tengah. 2010. Hasil survei sosial ekonomi nasional tahun 2009 Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Semarang: BPS Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Tengah. 2010. Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Jawa Tengah: Kabupaten/Kota Se Jawa Tengah 2005 – 2009. Kerjasama Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Tengah dan Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Semarang BPS Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Tengah. 2010. Analisis Indikator Ekonomi dan Sosial Jawa Tengah Tahun 2009. Kerjaqwsama Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Tengah dengan BPS Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Tengah. 2009. Analisis penyusunan kinerja makro ekonomi dan sosial Jawa Tengah Tahun 2008. Kerjasama Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Tengah dengan BPS Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Tengah. 2009. Data ketenagakerjaan di Jawa Tengah 2008. Surakarta: BPS Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Blair, J.P. 1995. Local economic development: analysis and practice. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd. Bristow, G. 2005. Everyone’s a ‘winner’: problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness. Journal of Economic Geography. 5: pp. 285 – 304. Boschma, R.A. 2004. Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective, Regional Studies. 38: 993 –1006. Boschma, R.A. and Frenken, K. 2006. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6: pp. 273 – 302. Budd, Leslie and Hirmis, Amer. 2004. 'Conceptual framework for regional competitiveness', Regional Studies, 38 (9): 1015-1028. Budi Santoso Eko, 2011, Analisis daya saing daerah dan implikasinya terhadap pembangunan wilayah di Jawa Timur, Disertasi Doktor, Tidak Dipublikasikan PDIE Pascasarjana Universitas Brawijaya Malang. Capello, R. and Nijkamp, P. 2009. Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Daryono Soebagiyo, 2013, Analisis daya saing daerah dan implikasinya terhadap pembangunan wilayah di Jawa Tengah, Laporan Penelitian dibiayai Koordinasi Perguruan Tinggi Wilayah VI Kemendikbud RI, Hibah Penelitian, 16 Mei 2013, UMS Surakarta. Daryono Soebagiyo, 2013, Regional Competitiveness and Its Implications For Development, JEP Vol 14, No.2, Desember 2013 Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ekonomi, UMS, Surakarta. Daryono Soebagiyo, 2008, Analisis kompetensi unggulan daerah pada produk batik tulis dan cap di Dati II Kota Surakarta, JEP Vol.9, No.2 Desember 2008. Daryono Soebagiyo dan Darmansyah, 2010 Stimulus ekspor terhadap kinerja perusahaan perusahaan batik, JEP Vol 11 No.2 Desember 2011 Dawkins, C.J. 2003. Regional development theory: conceptual foundations, classic works, and recent developments. Journal of Planning Literature. Vol. 18, No. 2. November 2003. Djakapermana, R.D. 2010. Pengembangan Wilayah Melalui Pendekatan Kesisteman. Bogor: IPB Press. Fujita, M. and Krugman, P. 2004. The new economic geography: past, present and the future. Papers in Regional Science, 83: 139 – 164. Gardiner, Bend. 2003. Regional competitiveness indicators for europe – audit, database construction and analysis. Regional Studies Association International Conference. Pisa. 12-15 April. Golub, S.S. and Hsieh, C.T. 2000. Classical Ricardian theory of comparative advantage revisited. Review of International Economics, Vol. 8 (2): 221 – 234. Isard, Walter, et.al. 1998. Methods of interregional and regional analysis. Aldeshot: Ashgate. Ke, Shanzi. 2009. Agglomeration, productivity, and spatial spillovers across Chinese cities. The Annals of Regional Science. DOI 10.1007/s00168-008-0285-0. Published online: 7 January 2009. Kitson, M., Martin, R. and Tyler, P. 2004. Regional Competitiveness: an elusive yet key concept? Regional Studies, 38 (9): 991 — 999. Kline, R.B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. KPPOD. 2007. Tata kelola ekonomi daerah di Indonesia 2007. Jakarta: KPPODUSAID- Asia Foundation. Krugman, Paul. 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99: 483 – 499. Krugman, Paul. 1996. Making Sense of the Competitiveness Debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 12, No. 3: 17 – 25. Morgan, K. and Nauwelaers, C. (eds.). 2003. Regional innovation strategies: the challenge for less-favored regions. London: Routledge. Neary, J.P. 2003. Competitive versus comparative advantage. The World Economy, Volume 26, Issue 4: 457 – 470. OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation. 2007. Competitive regional clusters: national policy approaches. Paris: OECD Publishing. OECD. 2009. How Regions Grow: Trends and Analysis. Paris: OECD Publishing. Pike, A., Rodriguez-Pose, A. and Tomaney, J. 2006. Local and Regional Development. London: Routledge. Porter, M.E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review. March – April: 73- 91. Porter, M.E. 1996. Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. International Regional Science Review. 19 (1 & 2): 85 – 94. PPSK Bank Indonesia dan LP3E FE Unpad. 2008. Profil dan pemetaan daya saing ekonomi daerah kabupaten/kota di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Ramanathan, R. 2003. An Introduction to data envelopment analysis: a tool for performance measurement. New Delhi: Sage Publications India. Romer, D. 2006. Advanced macroeconomics, 3rd edition. New York: Mc.Graw-Hill. Schumacker, R.E. and Lomax, R.G. 2004. A Beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Marwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers. Villaverde, J. 2006. A new look to convergence in Spain: a spatial econometric approach, European Urban and Regional Studies 2006; 13 (2): 131 – 141.in_ID
dc.identifier.issn1411-6081
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/5859
dc.description.abstractRegional Competitiveness be one of the issues in regional development policy since the enactment of regional autonomy. Based on the results of the efficiency analysis found 11 areas of the city and district have the efficiency and 4 districts do not have the efficiency. Regional Competitiveness in Central Java based Comparative Advantage and Competitive known regions that have a high comparative and competitive advantages consist of 4 areas. Regional Mapping Based on Efficiency and Productivity Local known areas that have high efficiency and productivity which consists of 4 areas. Based Competitive Advantage Regional Productivity is high and not found. Under the Regional Competitiveness and Regional Productivity high was not found. Based on Comparative Advantage and Regional Development area there are 4 high. Based Competitive Advantage and Regional Development of high there are 2 areas. Based on Regional Productivity and Regional Development of high there are 2 counties and cities Daya saing daerah menjadi salah satu isu dalam pembangunan daerah semenjak berlakunya kebijakan otonomi daerah. Berdasarkan hasil analisis efisiensi ditemukan 11 daerah kota dan kebupaten mempunyai efisiensi dan 4 kabupaten tidak memiliki efisiensi. Daya Saing Daerah di Jawa Tengah berdasarkan Keunggulan Komparatif dan Kompetitif diketahui daerah yang mempunyai keunggulan komparatif dan kompetitif tinggi terdiri dari 4 daerah. Pemetaan Daerah Berdasarkan Efisiensi dan Produktivitas Daerah diketahui daerah yang mempunyai tingkat efisiensi dan produktivitasnya tinggi yang terdiri dari 4 daerah. Berdasarkan Keunggulan Kompetitif dan Produktivitas Daerah yang tinggi tidak ditemukan. Berdasarkan Daya Saing Daerah dan Produktivitas Daerah yang tinggi tidak ditemukan. Berdasarkan Keunggulan Komparatif dan Pembangunan Wilayah yang tinggi terdapat 4 daerah. Berdasarkan Keunggulan Kompetitif dan Pembangunan Wilayah yang tinggi ada 2 daerah. Berdasarkan Produktivitas Daerah dan Pembangunan Wilayah yang tinggi ada 2 kabupaten dan kota.in_ID
dc.language.isoidin_ID
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartain_ID
dc.subjectcompetitivenessin_ID
dc.subjectproductivityin_ID
dc.subjectcompetitive advantage,in_ID
dc.subjectcomparative advantagein_ID
dc.subjectdaya saingin_ID
dc.subjectproduktivitasin_ID
dc.subjectkeunggulan kompetitifin_ID
dc.subjectkeunggulan komparatifin_ID
dc.titleImplikasi dan Daya Saing Daerah Terhadap Pembangunan Wilayah Jawa Tengahin_ID
dc.title.alternativeImplications and Competitiveness of Regions on Regional Development of Central Javain_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
06-Daryono Soebagiyo.pdf
Size:
1.212Mb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record