Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRuhaena, Lisnawati
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-19T07:01:15Z
dc.date.available2012-03-19T07:01:15Z
dc.date.issued2008-08
dc.identifier.citationBjorklund, D. F. (2005). Children’s Thinking, Cognitive Development and Individual deferences. Belmont: Thomson Learning. Byrne, B, Fielding-Barnsley, R. & Ashley, L. (2000). Effects of Preschool Phoneme Identity Training After Six Years: Outcome Level Distinguished from Rate of Response. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 92, 4, 659 – 667. Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E. & Prochnow, J. E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: a longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 4, 703 – 708. Cartwright, K. B. (2002). Cognitive development and reading: the relation of readingspecific multiple clacification skill to reading comprehention in elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 1, 56 – 63. Foorman, dkk., B. R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M.N., Fletcher, J.M., Moats, L.C. & Francis, D.J. (2006). The Impact of instructional practices in grades 1and 2 on reading and spelling achivement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology Journal, 31, 1 – 29. Graham.S., Harris K. R. & Fink B. (2000). Is Handwriting Causally Related to Learning to Write? Treatment of Handwriting Problems in Beginning Writers. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 92, 4, 620 – 633. Gardner, H. (1996). Inetelligence: Multiple Perspectives. New York: Thomson Learning Inc. Gleason, J. B. (1998). Psycholinguistics. Belmont: Wadsworth. Hetcher P. J., Goetz K., Snowling M.J., Hulme C., Gibbs S. & Smith G. (2006). Evidence for the Effectiveness of the Early Literacy Support Programme. British Journal of Education Psychology. 76. 351-367 Hoff, E. (2005). Language Development. Florida Atlantic University: Wadsworth. Juel, C. & Minden-cupp, C. (1999). Instruction in Primary Grades. www.ciera.org/ library/archive/1999-02/art-online-99-02.html, diakses Juni 2007. Levy, B. A., Gong, Z., Hessel, S., Evans, M. A. & Jared, D. (2006). Understanding Print: Early Reading Development and Contributions of Home Literacy Experience. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 93, 63 – 93. Lloyd, S. & Wernham, S. (1995). Jolly Phonics Workbook 1 – 7. London: Jolly Learning Ltd. Lloyd, S. & Stephen, L. (2006). The Phonics Handbook. London: Jolly Learning Ltd. Lloyd, S (1992). Jolly Phonics. www.jollylearning.co.uk, diakses Januari 2006. Lie, A. (2004). Manuntut Tanggung Jawab Negara atas Pendidikan. www.kompas.com, diakses Mei 2007. Morris, D., Tyner, B. & Perney, J. (2000). Early Steps: Replicating the Effects of a First Grade Teaching Intervention Program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 681 – 692. Papalia, D. E., Olds, S. W. & Feldman, R.D. (2002). A Child World’s Infancy Through Adolescence. New York: The McGraw Hill Companies Inc. Pitaloka, RR.A., (2003). Menulis dan Melukis. www.kompas.com, diakses Mei 2007. Stainthorp R., Hughes D, (1999). Learning from Children Who Read at Early Age. New York: Routledge. Stuart, M. (1999). “Getting Ready for Reading: Early Phoneme Awareness and Phonics Teaching Impoves Reading and Spelling in Inner-City Second Language Learners”. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 587-605. Tam,K. Y., Heward L.W., Heng A.M. (2006). A Reading Instruction Intervention Program for English-Language Learners Who are Struggling Readers. The Journal of Special Education; Summer 40, 2; 79-93 Tiatri, Sri. (2006). “Reading Comprehention and the Instruction of Reading Comprehention”. Paper presented in 1st Asian Psychology Asossiation, Bali, August 2006. Widyana, R. (2006). “Faktor-faktor Kognitif yang Mempengaruhi Kemampuan Membaca Anak-anak Kelas 1 dan 2 Sekolah Dasar”. Disertasi. Program Doktor Sekolah Pascasarjana. Univeresitas Gadjah Mada: Yogyakarta.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1411-5190
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/601
dc.description.abstractThis study compared the Indonesian and English initial literacy abilities of children who learnt them in Jolly Phonics method and those who learnt them in regular method. The population of the study was 60 children, who were divided into two groups, namely the control and experiment groups. Each group consisted of 30 children. The modification of Early Reading Screening Instrument (ERSI; Morris, 2000) was used to measure the literacy abilities. Measurement took place before and after literacy learning process. Then the gain scores were analyzed by t-test. The results showed that t = -2,511 with p= 0,015. These findings proved that the Indonesian and English literacy abilities of control group and experiment group were significantly different. The children who learnt in Jolly Phonics method had the greater ability than those who learnt in regular method.en_US
dc.subjectmembacaen_US
dc.subjectmenulisen_US
dc.subjectmetode jolly phonicsen_US
dc.subjectsiswa prasekolahen_US
dc.titlePENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN JOLLY PHONICS TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BACA-TULIS PERMULAAN BAHASA INDONESIA DAN BAHASA INGGRIS PADA ANAK PRASEKOLAHen_US
dc.title.alternativeTHE EFFECT OF JOLLY PHONICS LEARNING METHOD ON THE INDONESIAN AND ENGLISH INITIAL LITERACY ABILITY IN PRESCHOOL CHILDRENen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record