Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSantosa, Mulato
dc.contributor.authorNatsir, Muhammad
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-16T05:09:49Z
dc.date.available2015-06-16T05:09:49Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-13
dc.identifier.citationAinul Mohsein Abdul-Mohsin, Hasliza Abdul-Halim, Noor Hazlina Ahmad. 2012. Delving into the issues of entrepreneurial attitude orientationand market orientation among the SMEs A conceptual paper. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65: 731 – 736. Aloulou, W., & Fayolle A. 2005. A Conceptual approach of entrepreneurial orientation within small business context. Journal of Entreprising Culture. Vol 13, no. 1: 21-45 Baker, W.E. & Sinkula, J.M. 1999. The synergetic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science , 27(4), 411-427 Bamberger, I. 1989. Developing competitive advantage in small and medium-size firm. Long Range Planning, 22(5): 80-88 Banjo Roxas, Doren Chadee. 2013. Effects of formal institutions on the performance of the tourism sector in the Philippines: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Tourism Management, 37: 1-12 Barnay, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120 Brian S. Anderson ,Yoshihiro Eshima. 2013. The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 28: 413–429 Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future direction. Academy of Management Review, 20: 342-378 Castanias, R. P., & Helfat, C. E. 2001. The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Management, 27(6): 661-668 Cater, T., & Carter, B. 2009. (In)tangible resources as antecedents of a company’s competitive advantage and performance. JEMMS.2:186-209 Cleveland, G., Schroeder, R.G., & Anderson, J. C. 1989. A theory of production competence. Decision Science, 20(4): 655-658 Covin, J. G., & Covin, T. 1990. Competitive aggressiveness, environmental context, and small firm performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practices, 14(4) :35-50 Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. 1989. Strategic management of small firm in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal. 10 :75-87 Day, G.S. 1994. Continuous learning obout markets. California Management Review, 36(4), 9-31 Day, G. S., & Wenslay, R. 1988. Assesing advantage: A framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52(2): 1-20 Dimitros, P.,Lioukas, S., & Carter, S. 2004. Relationship between entrepreneurship and international performance: The importance of domestic environment, International Business Review, 13: 19-41 Drucker P. 1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship.New York: Harper and Row Drucker P. 1999. Knowledge-worker productivity: The Biggest challenge. California Management Review, 41(2), 79-94 Fiegenbawm, A. & Karnani A. 1991. Output flexibility-A competitive advantage for small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 12: (10-11): 101-114 Ghozali, I. 2006. Structural equation modeling metode alternatif dengan Partial Least Square (PLS). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip. Gulzhanat Tayauova. 2011. The Impact of International Entrepreneurial Orientation on Strategic Adaptation. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24 (2011) 571–578 Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tanham,R. L., & Black, W. C. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prantice Hall Inc. Handfield, R. B., & Pannesi, R. T. 1995. Antecedents and lead-time competitiveness in make-toorder manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 33(2): 511-537 Hoffman, N. P. 2000. An exanination of the “sustainable competitive advantages” concept: Past, present, and future. Academic of Marketing Review, 4: 1-16 Harison, R.T. & Leitch, C.M. Entrepreneurial learning: Researching the interface between learning and the entrepreneurial context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 351-371 Huber, G.P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contribution processes and the literature. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115 Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. 2007. Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36: 651-661 Jantunen, A., Puumalinen, S., Samisarenketo, & Kylaheiko, K. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities, and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, (3): 223-243 Jogiyanto, H. M. 2009. Konsep dan aplikasi Partial Least Square (PLS) untuk penelitian empiris. Yogyakarta: BPFE Johanna Hallback & Peter Gabrielsson. 2013. Entrepreneurial marketing strategies during the growth of international new ventures originating in small and open economies. International Business Review, 23: 234-254 Jose C. Casillas, Ana M. Moreno, Jose´ L. Barbero. 2011. Entrepreneurial orientation of family firms:Family and environmental dimensions. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2: 90–100 Juha Soininen, MinnaMartikainen, Kaisu Puumalainen, KaleviKylaheiko. 2012. Entrepreneurial orientation: Growth and profitability of Finnish small- and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal Production Economics, 140: 614–621 Kemenkop dan UMKM Republik Indonesia. 2012. Indikator makro konomi UMKM: kinerja UMKM dalam perekonomian Indonesia 2012 Makalah Seminar Kessler, E., & Chakrabarti, A. 1996. Innovation speed: a conceptual mode of contex, antecedents, and outcomes. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 1143-1191 Kirzner, M. 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1): 60-85 Kotha, S., & Vadlamani, B. L. 1995. Assessing generic strategies: An empirical investigation two competing typologies in discrete manufacturing industries. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1) : 75-83 Kuratko, D. F., & Audretsch, D. B. 2009. Strategic entrepreneurship: exploring different perspectives of an emerging concept. Entrepreneurshp Theory and Practice, 1: 1-17 Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. 2001. The power of entrepreneurial actions: Insight from Acordia, Inc. Academy of Management Executive, 6(1): 40-54 Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. 2001. Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial action: Acordia’s corporate strategy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4): 60-71 Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Rao, S. S. 2006. The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantages and organizational performance. The International Journal of Management Science, 34: 107-124 Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G. G. 1996. Linking two dimentions of entrepreneurial orientation to business performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. . Journal of Business Venturing, 16: 429-451 Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G. G. 2001. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review 21: 135-172 Ma, H. 1999. Creation and preemption for competitive advantage. Management Decision. 37(3): 259-266 Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C. 1978. Organization Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill Miller, D., Freiesen, P. 1978. Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 24: 921- 933 Miller, D., Freiesen, P. 1983. Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4: 221-235 Naman, J. L., & Slevin, D. P. 1993. Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model impirical tests. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 137-153 Nathaniel Boso, John W. Cadogan , Vicky M. Story. 2012. Complementary effect of entrepreneurial and market orientations on export new product success under differing levels of competitive intensity and financial capital. International Business Review, 21: 667–681 Newbert, L. S. 2008. Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: A conceptual-level imperical investigation of the resources-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 29: 745-768 Peteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. B. 2003. Unravelling the resource-based tagle. Managerial and Decition Economics, 24: 309-323 Porter, M. 1980. Competitive strategy.New York: Free Press. Porter, M. 1985. Competitive advantages. New York: Free Press. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. 1990. The core competence of corporations. Harvard Business Review, May-Juni: 79-91 Rondeau, P. J., Vonderembse, M. A., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. 2000. Exploring work system practices for time-based manufacturer: their impact on competitve advantages. Journal of Operations Management, 18(5): 509-529 Roth, A., & Miller, J. 1990. Manufacturing strategy, manufacturing strength, managerial success, and economic outcome. In: Ettlie J., Burstein, M., Fiegehaum, A., editor. Manufacturing strategy. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publisher Senge, P.M. 1990. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday. Sinkula, J.M. 1994. Market information processing and organizational learning. Journal of Marketing, 58(Januari, 35-45 Sinkula, J.M., Baker, W.E., & Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational lerarning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 305-318. Slater, S. F., & Naver, J. C. 1995. Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3): 63-74 Slater, S. F., & Naver, J. C. 2000. The positive effect of a market orientation on business profitability: A balanced replication. Journal of Business Research, 48: 69-73 Stalk, G. 1988. Time-the next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 66(4): 41-51 Susanne B. Spillecke , Malte Brettel. 2012. The impact of sales management controls on the entrepreneurial orientation of the sales department. European Management Journal, 34: 144-166 Tang, J., Tang, Z., Marino, L.D., Zang, Y., & Li, Q. (2001). Exploring an Interved U-Shape relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Chinese Ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, (1): 219-239 Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capability and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-533 Tobin, D.R. 1993. Re-education the corporation. Foundation for the learning organization. Essex Junction, VT: Oliver Wright. Tommy Clausen , Tor Korneliussen.2012. The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and speed to the market: The case of incubator firms in Norway. Technovation, 32: 560–567 Vesey, J. T. 1991. The new competitors: they think the terms of speed-to-market. Academic Management Executive, 5(2): 23-33 Vickery, S., Calantone, R., and Dogre, C. 1999. Supply chain flexibility: an empirical study. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(3): 16-24 Wiklund, J. 1999. The sustainability of entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 24: 37-48 Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. 2003. Research note and commentaries: Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1307-1314 Zahra, S., & Covin, J. 1995. Contextual influence relationship: on the corporate entrepreneurshipperformance relationship: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing 10: 43-58 Zhang, Q.Y. 2001. Technology infusion enabled value chain flexibility: a learning and cabability based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 107-114 Zou, S., Fang, E., & Zhao, S. 2003. The effect of export marketing capability on export performance: an investigation of Chinese exporters. Journal of International Marketing, 11(4): 32-55in_ID
dc.identifier.issn2460-0784
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/6094
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to test the role of mediating variables compeititive advantage and learning organizational on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in dinamic competiton. This research was conducted by survey method to the respondents in small and medium enterprises at Magelang City consist of 178 respondents. Data analysis was performed using SEM WartPLS 3.0. The simultan test showed that entrepeneurial orientation has no direct relation with firm performance p=0,12, so p >0,05. Than entrepreneurial orientation as independen variable has postive relation with competitive advantage (ß=0,67; p<0,01; R2=0,45) and organizational learning (ß=0,72; p<0,01; R2=0,51). Than competitive advantage and learning organizational as mediator variable has significan relation with entrepreneurial orientation (ß=038, p<0,01,) and (ß=0,24, p<0,01, ) and (R2=0,43). Relational model among variables has good GoF (APC=0,426, p<0,01; ARS=0,462, p<0,01; VIF=2,206<5). These results indicate that competitive advantage and organizational learning is fully mediated the relation between entrepreneurial orentation and firm performance. This study contributes to add competitive advantage and organizational learning as mediating variables on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. The study states that in dynamic competition, company with entrepreneurial orentation will improve the performance when it has competitive advantage and organizational learning occurs in company.in_ID
dc.language.isoidin_ID
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartain_ID
dc.subjectentrepreneurial orientationin_ID
dc.subjectcompetitive advantagein_ID
dc.subjectorganizational learningin_ID
dc.subjectfirm performancein_ID
dc.titlePemediasian Keunggulan Bersaing dan Pembelajaran Organisasional terhadap Hubungan Orientasi Kewirausahaan dengan Kinerjain_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record