Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSrinarwati, Dwi Retnani
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T04:03:08Z
dc.date.available2015-12-07T04:03:08Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-07
dc.identifier.citation[1] S. Carolyn. Landscape for a Good Woman. London: Virago. 1986. [2] D. Fred. Fashion, Culture, and Identity. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. 1994. [3] B. Jean. Masyarakat Konsumsi. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana. 2004. [4] C. P. Gilman. Woman and Economic. Mineola: Dover Publications Inc. 1998. [5] I. Luce. This Sex Which is not One. Terjemahan Catherine Porter. Ithaca: Cornel University Press. 1985. [6] B. Charlotte. “A Thief in The Night: Stories of Feminism in The 1970s at CCCS”. Dalam Morley, D. & Kuan-Hsing Chen (ed). Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge. 1998 [7] E. Wilson. Adorned in Dream: Fashion and Modernity. London: Virago1985 [8] B. Piere. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge. 1988. [9] C. Lury. “The Right and Wrongs of Culture: Issues of Theory and Methodology”, in B. Skeggs, ed. Feminist Cultural Theory: Process and Production. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 1995. [10] M. J. Lee, Consumer Culture Reborn: The Cultural Politics of Consumption. London: Routledge. 1993. [11] F. Mike. Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. London: Sage. 1991. [12] W. Raymond. Culture. London: Fontana. 1981. [13] Malcolm Barnard. Fashion sebagai Komunikasi: Cara Mengomunikasikan Identitas Sosial, Seksual, Kelas, dan Gender. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra. 2011. [14] Hooker, Virginia Matheson. “Ekspresi: Kreatif Biarpun Tertekan” in Donald K. Emerson (ed.), Indonesia Beyond Soeharto: Negara, Ekonomi, Masyarakat, Transisi. Jakarta: Gramedia & The Asia Foundation Indonesia. 2001. [15] Joseph A. DeVito. Human Communication: The Basic Course, Ed. 6. New York: Harper Collins. 1994. [16] M. John. Dress for Succes. New York: P.H. Wyden. 1975. [17] M. John. Women’s Dress for Succes. Chicago: Follet. 1977. [18] G. Faurschou. “Fashion and The Cultural Logic of Postmodernity” in A. Kroker dan M., (ed.), Body Invaders. London: Macmillan. 1988. [19] M. Berman. “The Experience of Modernity” in J. Thackara (ed). Design After Modernism. London: Thames and Hudson. 1988. [20] M. R. Pauline. Postmodernism and Social Sciences: Insight, Inroads, and Intrusion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1992. [21] F. Jameson. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press. 1991. [22] B. Jean. ForA Critiqueof the Political Economy of Sign.Terj. Charles Levin. St. Louis: Telos Press. 1981. [23] E. Wilson. “These New Component of The Spectacle: Fashion and Postmodernism” dalam R. Boyne dan A. Rattansi (ed.). Postmodernism and Society. London: Macmillan. 1990. [24] K. Douglas. Budaya Media: Cultural Studies, Identitas, dan Politik antara Modern dan Postmodern. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra. 2010. [25] A. Lurry. The Language of Clothes. London: Bloomsbury. 1992. [26] A. Alfathri. Menggeledah Hasrat: Sebuah Pendekatan Multi Perspektif. Yogyakarta and Bandung: Jalasutra. 2006. [27] B. Zev. “Popular Culture: A Sociological Approach“, C.W.E. Bigsby. Approaches to Popular Culture. London: Edward Arnold. 1976. [28] B.Jean. Seduction. Translater: Brian Singer. New York: St. Martin’s Press. 1990. [29] B. Jean. Forget Foucault. New York: Semiotext (e). 1987. [30] H. David. The Condition of Posmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell. 1989. [31] B. Jean. Simulations. New York: Semiotext (e). 1983. [32] K. Johnson dan F. Tom. Thrusting Ourselves: The Sourcebook on Psychology for Women. New York: The Antantic Monthly Press. 1990. [33] S. Sunindyo. “Gender Discourse on Television”, in Virginia Matheson Hooker (ed.), Culture and Society in New Order Indonesia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press. 1995.in_ID
dc.identifier.issn2477-3328
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/6333
dc.description.abstractThe problems of woman as imagery consumer are closely related to consumer’s culture. The contemporary culture of consumer causes a condition which forces people to use consumer goods to symbolize different and various lifestyles. That who she is, what class she comes from, and how she consumes are things which make others realize that identity is not fixed, but it is something that can be played, constructed, and reconstructed. Almost every day, people are attacked with imagery of ideal woman which is constructed through and by media. That woman should perform enchantingly in public places, recently, becomes the core theme for advertisement of popular media, particularly woman’s media. Fashion and cosmetics reveal the clearest arena for consumer’s passion. This leads some women to an endless beauty hunting in the cycle of satisfaction seeking which then enable them to join the world of loneliness and alienation. The recent phenomenon indicated that cyber space through internet which can across space and time can function as body imagery media. Finally, on the one hand, woman becomes consumer for fulfilling their ideal standard; on the other hand, the industry of beauty and body treatment which has become big business, has brought ‘woman as imagery consumer’.in_ID
dc.language.isoen_USin_ID
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartain_ID
dc.subjectwomanin_ID
dc.subjectimagery consumerin_ID
dc.subjectfashion and cosmeticsin_ID
dc.subjectpostmodern perspectivein_ID
dc.titleWomen as Imagery Consumer (Clothes and Cosmetics as The Phenomena of Cultural Perspective of Postmodernism)in_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record