| dc.identifier.citation | Davis, K. S. 2003. “Change is hard”: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science and Education, 87(1), 3-30. Elliot,D., 1999. Learning to Think, Newsweek, September 6, 38-41. Fraser, B. J. 1986. Classroom Environment, Croom Helm, London. Hinduan, A. A. 2005. Meningkatkan Profesionalisme guru IPA di Sekolah. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA II, Bandung, 23 Juli 2005. Mellado, V. 1998. The classroom practice of preservice teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning. Science Education, 82, 197-214. Oser, F., & J. L. Patry. 1990. Choreographien Unterrichtlichen Lernens: Basismodelle des Unterrichts [Choreographies of Teaching and Learning: Basic models of teaching]. Freiburg: Paedagogisches Institut der Universitaet Freiburg. Rustaman, N., S. Dirdjosoemarto, S.A. Yudianto, Y. Achmad, D. Rochintaniawati, M.N. Kusumastuti, 2005. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi (Common Textbook), Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi Fakultas Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Rustaman, N., A. Widodo, S. Anggraeni, N. Junaengsih. 2005. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Piloting Biologi. FPMIPA UPI: Tidak diterbitkan. Saito, E. 2004. Indonesian “Lesson Study” in practice: Case study of IMSTEP. Paper disajikan dalam Workshop bagi Guru-Guru Matematika dan Sains. Bandung. Stigler, J. W., & J. Hiebert. 1999. The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World’s Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom. New York: The Free Press. Widodo, A. & Sintya Pujiastuti. 2006. Profil pertanyaan guru dan siswa dalam pembelajaran sains. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, in print. Widodo, A. & Vidia Ramdhaningsih. 2006. Analisis kegiatan praktikum biologi dengan menggunakan video. Metalogika, 9(2), 146-158. Widodo, A., & L. Nurhayati. 2005. Tahapan Pembelajaran yang Konstruktivis: Bagaimanakah Pembelajaran Sains di Sekolah? Paper presented at the Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Bandung. Widodo, Yeti Sumiati & Cucu Setiawati. 2006. “Peningkatan kemampuan siswa SD untuk mengajukan pertanyaan produktif”. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. 4(1), 1-12. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract: The study analyzes the impact of “Lesson Study”-based school experience program on
the improvement of preservice teachers’ teaching competencies. Unlike the usual school experience
program, the “Lesson Study”-based school experience program required the preservice teachers to
follow steps of “Lesson Study”, i.e. plan, do, and see. For the purpose of the study, lessons taught by
the preservice teachers’ are fully documented using a video camera. In addition, a students’
questionnaire was also administrated to collect data on classroom emotional climate. Analysis of
the videos find that the pre-service teachers’ can perform most indicators of teachers teaching
competencies. The utilization of teaching resources, however, is still limited. Analyzes of the
questionnare show that classroom emotional climate is quite good. The findings suggest that the
preservice teachers’ participated in “Lesson Study”-based school experience still shown some
weaknesses in their teaching. During the reflection sessions, however, the pre-service teachers
admitted that “Lesson Study” based school experience program provided them with meaningful
insights on how to improve their teaching competencies. | en_US |
