Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarsono
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-27T04:24:44Z
dc.date.available2012-03-27T04:24:44Z
dc.date.issued2007-12
dc.identifier.citationAlvesson & Skoldber. 2000. Refletive Methodology :New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publication Ary, Donald, L.C. Jacobs, & Razavieh. 2005. Introduction to Research in Education. 3rd. New york: Holt Rinerhart and Winston Bogdan, R.C. & S.K. Biklen. 1998. Qualitative Research for Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Grant, N. 2002. Tasks for Comparative Education in the New Millenium”. Comparative Education. Augs 2000 Harsono. 2005. Pengaruh Belajar Kelompok terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Surakarta : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Imansyah, Budi S. 2004. “Memahami Integrasi Pribadi Anak dalam Belajar”. Pikiran Rakyat. Rabu, 7 April. Jorissen, K.T. 2002. Training Alternative Route Teachers: The Power of Professional Integration in Teacher Preparation and Induction”. The High School Journal. Oct/Nov 2002 Kweldju. 2004. Model-model Penelitian dengan Pendekatan Kualitatif. Makalah Lokakarya Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Lembaga Penelitian. Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Malang, 27 – 29 September. Mantja, Willem. 2005. Etnografi: Desain Penelitian Manajemen Pendidikan. Malang: Progdi AdPend dan Manajemen Pendidikan PPS, IKIP Malang Miles & Huberman. 1984. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terjemahan. Jakarta: Yayasan Penerbitan Universitas Indonesia Moleong. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya Salladien, 2004. Rancangan Penelitian Kualitatif. Makalah Lokakarya Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Lembaga Penelitian. Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Malang, 27 – 29 September. Spradley, J.P. 1997. The Etnographic Interview. Terjemahan oleh Misbah Yulva Elisabeth. Jogjakarta : PT Tiara Wacana Suksmana. 2007. Dinamika Proses Belajar. Diakses dari http://www.google.com. Tanggal 20 November 2007 Sutopo, H.B. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar Teori dan Terapanya dalam Penelitian. Surakarta : Sebelas Maret Universty Press Tilaar, H.A.R. 2000. Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta : Penerbit Rineka Cipta Yasumoto, J.Y.,K. Uekawa, K., & C.E. Bidwell . 2001. The Collegial Focus and High School Students’ Achievement”. Sociology of Education. Vol 74 (July): 181 – 209en_US
dc.identifier.issn0852-0976
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/680
dc.description.abstractAbstract: We realized the need of increasing study achievement for the students. School has the obligation for increasing study achievement for all of the students, including students who have serious problem in study. The characteristic of them, such as: passive, irritate, not focus in study, afraid, and avoid the teachers and counselor. The research used ethnography approach, choosing human resources and guidance teachers, collecting data used in dept interview. Data analysis model is done with regularly data. The research result shows that students study achievement can be increased by giving a good chance to find out suitable friends, to take a part in school organization, an opportunity to perform, and the need of achievement.en_US
dc.subjectachievementen_US
dc.subjectlearning informal groupsen_US
dc.titlePendidikan, Vol. 19, No. 2, Desember 2007 100 MENINGKATKAN PRESTASI BELAJAR MELALUI KELOMPOK BELAJAR INFORMAL: Studi Kelompok Informal Siswa SMA di Boyolali, Jawa Tengah, Indonesiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record