| dc.identifier.citation | Andersen, Orin W. & Krathwohl, David R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: David McKay Company Inc. Birmingham Suothern College. (2004). Professional Competencies. Diambil tanggal 7 Desember 2004, dari http://www.bsc.edu/academics/education/dispositions/ competencies.htm Cooper, James M. (1986). Clssroom Teaching Skills (3rd). Stok, Boston: D.C. Heath and Company. Depdiknas, Dirjen Dikdsasmen. (2003). Penilaian dan Pelaporan Hasil Belajar Peserta Diklat SMK. Jakarta:Depdiknas. Depdiknas, Dirjen Dikti. (2004). Standar Kompetensi Guru Pemula Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jakarta:Depdiknas. Esseff, P. J. & Esseff, Mary S. (1977). Learning Hierarchy and Modules. Washington:Educational System for the Putur Publ. Gagne, Robert M. & Briggs, Leslie J. (1979). Principle of Instruction Design. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. Gagne, Robert M. (1977). The Conditions of Learning. New York:HR & Winston. Goncsi, Andrew. (2004). The New Professional and Vocational Education. Crows Nest NSW:Allen & Unwin. Gronlund, Norman E. (1977). Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching (5th Ed.). New York:Macmillan Publishing Company. Harris, Roger, Guthrie, Hugh, Hobart, Barry & Lunberg, David. (1995). Competency-Based Education and Training. South Yarra: MacMillan Education Australia. Suparji. (2007). Pengembangan Konstruk Instrumen Kompetensi Keguruan Mahasiswa Calon Guru SMK. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Some sighs from the side of SMK for the agenda of guiding student practice of teaching is
student’s lack of ability in the major, student who is not often to have consultation with guide teacher,
student unable to adapt and socialization with environment in the practice school. Based on the
background, hence done research especially to see how far pedagogic and professional competencies
of teacher candidate student. This research executed in June 2007 until September 2007 in eight
practice schools. Population of this research is all students S1 in majors civil engineering educations
which programing PPL II at 2007/2008 and as sample to get information about pedagogic
competencies for the execution component of study is student who practice teaching in SMKN
(Perkapalan) Sidoarjo and SMKN 3 Surabaya. Tryout instrument of professional competencies has
done at students in generation 2004 that has executed PPL I period 2006/2007. Validation contents
and construction of instrument of pedagogic and professional competencies has been done by the
expert. Result of this research indicates that attainment of pedagogic competencies teacher candidate
student ranged from 70,80% until 75,70% or average 72,70%, and professional competencies ranged
from 32,31% until 67,69% or average 54,59%. In general this thing can be told that attainment of
competency still below in the mark minimum competencies required (if required e” 75%). | en_US |
