Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuparji
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-28T04:34:35Z
dc.date.available2012-03-28T04:34:35Z
dc.date.issued2009-06
dc.identifier.citationAsosiasi Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan Indonesia. 2006. Butir-butir Rekomendasi Tentang Pelaksanaan Program Sertifikasi Guru. Bandung: ALPTKI. Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. 1983. Educational Research:An Introduction (4th.). New York:Longman. Cooper, J.M. 1986. Clssroom Teaching Skills (3rd). Stok, Boston:D.C. Heath and Company. George, R.L., & Cristiani, T.S. 1981. Theory, Methods, and Processes of Counseling and Psychometry. Englewood Cliff, NJ:Prenctice Hall. Goncsi, A. 2004. The New Professional and Vocational Education. Crows Nest NSW:Allen & Unwin. Gordon, T. 1997. Menjadi Guru Efektif. Jakarta:Gramedia. Hall, C.S., & Lindzey, G. 1993. Teori-teori Holistik (Organismik-Fenomenologis). Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Harris, R., Guthrie, H., Hobart, B. et al. 1995. Competency-Based Education and Training. South Yarra:MacMillan Education Australia PTY. LTD. Mehrens, W.A., & Lehmann, I.R. 1973. Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. NY:Holt rinehort and Winston Inc. Mouly, G.J. 1973. Psychology for Effective Teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc. Pervin, L.A. 1989. Personality:Theory and Research. New York:John Wiey & sons Inc. Riding, R., & Rayner, S. 1998. Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies. London: David Fulton Publishers. Slavin, R. E. 1984. Educational psychology theory and practice (5thed.). Boston:Allyn and Bacon. Syaiful Bahri Djamarah. 2000. Guru Dan anak Didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta. Sumadi Suryabrata. 2005. Psikologi Kepribadian. Jakarta:PT.Raja Grafindo Persada. Suparno. 2002. Hubungan Minat Baca dengan Hasil Belajar (Studi pada Mahasiswa FT UNP). Jurnal Skolar, 1, 99-109. Tilaar, H. A. R. 2000. Lima Puluh Mutiara Pemikiran. Jakarta:AYUB.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0852-0976
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/707
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to produce a valid and reliable instrument to measure personal competence of student teachers, which is theoretically studied, examined by experts, and empirically tested through the preliminary field try-out, main filed try-out, and operational field try-out. This study aims to describe student theachers’ personal competence profiles as well. The try-out subject of this study were student teachers conducting the teaching practicum. The try-outs were carried out three times: the preliminary field try-out conducted in four schools involving 12 student teachers, the main field try-out in eight schools involving 100 student teachers, and the operational field try-out in 15 shools involving 200 student teachers. The analysis techingues employed the confirmatory factor analysis and the descriptive analysis. The research findings show that student teachers’ personal competence comprises the personal stability, personal maturity, behavioral excellence, and autonomy. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis show that values of tobserved are all > 1.69 and the reliability is 0.85. The resulting statistical model shows the model is fit (÷2=0,95 p=0,61883). The resuls of the descriptive analysis sho that the personal stability is in very good category, the personal the personal maturity and the behavioral excellence are in the good category, and the autonomy is in the very good categori.en_US
dc.subjectinstrumenten_US
dc.subjectcompetence of personalen_US
dc.subjectstudents’ teacheren_US
dc.titleVaria Pendidikan, Vol. 21, No. 1, Juni 2009 30 PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN KOMPETENSI KEPRIBADIAN MAHASISWA CALON GURUen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record