dc.identifier.citation | Airasian, P.W. 1994. Classroom Assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Angelo, A.T. and K. Patricia Cross. 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques. A Handbook for College Teachers. Second Edition. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Babbie, E., 2004. The Practice of Social Research. 10th Edition. USA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning. Buntu, P., 2005. Pengolahan dan Pemanfaatan Hasil Penilaian. Modul Bahan Belajar Mandiri Program D-II PGSD. Evaluasi Pembelajaran (EVJAR.II.06). Jakarta: Pusat Teknologi Komunikasi dan Informasi Pendidikan. Depdiknas. Depdiknas, 2002. Penilaian Berbasis Kelas. Jakarta: Pusat Krikulum, Balitbang Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Jalan Gunung Sahari Raya No. 4. 10710. Depdiknas, 2002. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta Pusat: Pusat Kurikulum. Balitbang Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Jalan Gunung Sahari Raya No. 4. 10710. Depdiknas, 2002. Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia No. 047/U/2002 tanggal 4 April 2002 Bab III pasal 3 tentang Penilaian Berasaskan Kelas. Depdiknas, 2003. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Erman.S dan Yaya.S (1990). Kriteria penentuan hasil belajar. Bandung. Wijaya Kusuma. Fernandes, H.J.X., 1984. Testing and Measurement. Jakarta: National Educational Planning, Evaluation and Curriculum Development. FKIP-UNRI, 1984. Panduan Penulisan Skripsi Mahasiswa. Pekanbaru: Universitas Riau. Gronlund, E.N., 1976. Measurement and evaluation in Teaching. Third Edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. Hill, B.C. and Ruptic, C., 1994. Practical Aspects of Authentic Assessment: Putting the Pieces Together. Christopher-Gordon Publisher, Inc. Noerwood, MA. Hughes, A., 2003. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge Handbooks for Language Teahers. Linn, R.L. dan Gronlund, N.E., 1995. Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc. Rahma Boedi R. Purboyo, 2006. Penilaian Berbasis Kelas. Jakarta: Research and Assessment Dept. Post Graduate Program State University of Jakarta. Satterly, D., 1981. Assessment in Schools. Tonbridge: Freeman Graphic. Stiggins, R.J., 1994. Student Centered Classroom Assessment. Merril, Imprint of McMillan College Publisher Co, NJ. Stufflebeam, et al., 1971. Educational Evaluation and Decision Making. Hance, IL: Peacock.Suharsini Arikunto, 2002. Prosedur Penelitian. Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Edisi Revisi V. Jakarta: Penerbit Rineka Cipta. Tim Pustaka Yustrisia, 2008. Panduan Lengkap KTSP SD, SMP, dan SMA. Pustaka Yustisia. Yogyakarta. T. Ramli Zakaria, 2006. Penilaian Kelas. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan. Jalan Gunung Sahari No. 4. Western and Northern Canadian Protocol for Collaboration in Education, 2006. Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind. <www.wncp.ca> | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This research is aimed at finding out the cognitive level of the state SMP teachers toward
the concept of classroom-based assessment. The sample respondents were 297 English teachers
taken from 11 cities/regencies within Riau Province. The procedure of the research was administered
by inviting them to give an opinion through a set of questionnaire containing statements on cognitive
aspects towards the concept of classroom-based assessment. This kind of data collection is known as
Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) created by Stufflebeam et.al (1971). Data analysis was
calculated in descriptive method using SPSS Version 11.5, that is, by describing the percentage, min
score as well as the standard deviation. Data calculation described that the lowest min score was
3.2949 with the standard deviation 0.63; while the highest one was 3.5539 with the standard deviation
0.53. As a result, the average min score was 3.4244 with the standard deviation 0.5866. Based on this
calculation, it could be concluded that the cognitive level of state SMP English teachers within Riau
Province towards the concept of classroom-based assessment was in ‘mediocre’ level, particularly,
on the aspects of ‘introduction’, comprehension’, ‘application’, ‘analysis’, ‘synthesis’ and ‘evaluation.’ | en_US |