Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNurharjanti, Nashirotun Nisa
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-20T07:01:34Z
dc.date.available2016-06-20T07:01:34Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-28
dc.identifier.citation[1] Badenhost, J.A., 1994, Unecthical Behaviour in Procurement A Perspective On Causes and Solutions, Journal of Business Ethics. [2] Phillip, B., dan Jennifer Kelly, 1996, The Ethics of Sentencing White – Colour Criminals, Journal of Business Ethics. [3] Boynton C. William et.all, Modern Auditing, Edisi 7, Jilid 1 Penerbit Erlangga [4] Creswell, John W., 2012, Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed, Edisi Ketiga, Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar. [5] Fajarina,W. Darwanis, dan Usman Abu Bakar, 2012, Pengaruh Lingkungan Pengendalian, Penilaian Resiko, Kegiatan Pengendalian, Informasi dan Komunikasi, Serta Pemantauan Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pada SKPD Di Pemerintah Aceh, Jurnal Akuntansi Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala. [6] Eko, P.S., 2007, Pelelangan Umum Sebagai Sarana Mewujudkan Good Governance (Studi Kasus Proyek-Proyek pada Dinas Pertanian dan Peternakan Kabupaten Lombok Tengah), Tesis Tidak Dipublikasikan Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Gadjah Mada [7] Gerald, H. L., Government Procurement Fraud, College of Business University of South Florida. [8] Hermiyetti, 2011, Pengaruh Penerapan Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Pence-gahan Fraud Pengadaan Barang, STEKPI Jakarta. [9] Indonesia Procurement Watch, Tool kit anti korupsi dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah, Lima Belas Langkah Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah. [10] Jatiningtyas, N., dan Kiswara Endang, 2011,Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mem-pengurahi Fraud Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pada Lingkungan Instansi Pemerintah Di Wilayah Semarang, www.eprints.undip.ac.id [11] Kalubanga, M., Kakwezi, P., & Kayiise, D, 2013, The Effect of Fradulent Procu-rement Practise on Public Performance, International Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences. [12] Kohlberg, L. 1969, Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Development Approach To Socialization. In Velasques. 2006. Business Ethics: Concept and Cases, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Business Publising. [13] “Laporan Tahunan KPK”, 2011, www.kpk.go.id [14] Lansing, P., dan Kimberly. B., 1991, Ethics and The Defense Procurement System, Journal of Business Ethics. [15] Lennerfors, T.T. , 2007, The Transformation of Transparency – On The Act Public Procurement and The Right To Appeal in The Context, Journal of Business Ethics. [16] Nasir , Moch, 2005, Metode Penelitian, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta. [17] Pengadaan Barang Jasa Penyumbang Kebocoran Keuangan Negara, 2008, http://www.antaranews.com/ [18] Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia N0.54 Tahun 2010 , Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah [19] Peranan Masyarakat Dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah, http://www.lawangpost.com/ [20] Puspasari, N., dan Eko Suwardi, Pengaruh Moralitas Individu dan Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akutansi: Studi Eksperimen Pada Konteks Pemerintah Daerah, Jurnal Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XV [21] Rahardja, A., 2010, Efisiensi Dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah:Perspektif Pencegahan Korupsi, One Day Workshop Procurement Efficiency, Perusahaan Listrik Negara Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi [22] Rahmat, S., 2006, Analisis Kondisi Lingkungan Pengendalian (Control Envi-ronment) Dalam Sistem Pengendalian Intern Bank BTN, Tesis Dipublikasikan Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Diponegoro. [23] Razzaque, M. A., & Tan Piak Hwee., 2002, Ethics and Purchasing Dilemma; A Singaporean View, Journal of Business Ethics. [24] Ruslan, 2009., Internal Control Berbasis COSO, diunduh dari www.mediainformasi.com [25] Robinson, S.L. dan R.J. Bennet, 1995. A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behavior; A Multidimensional Scalling Study: Academy of Management Journal. [26] Setya, Yusep, F.P., 2010, Kesesuaian Proses Pengadaan Barang Pemerintah Dengan Standar Operating Procedures (SOP): Studi Kasus Pengadaan Peralatan Penunjang Pendidikan Pada Politeknik NDD, Tesis Dipublikasikan Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Indonesia. [27] Snapshot Assessment, 2007, Indonesia’s Public Procurement System-Piloting OECD/DAC Procurement JV Baseline Indicator (BLI)Beanchmarking Methodology Version 4, www. oecd.org. [28] Soreide, T., 2002, Corruption in Public Procurement Causes, Consequences, and Cures, Chr.Michelsen Institute Development Studies and Human Rights. [29] Sugiyono, 2008, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan R&D, Penerbit Alfabeta Bandung. [30] Thai, K. V., 2001, Public Procurement Re-examined, Journal Of Public Procurement, Vol. 1, Issue 1, 9-50. [31] Tuanakota, T. M., 2012 , Akuntansi Forensik & Audit Investigasi, Penerbit Salemba Empat. [32] Y.R. Dewi Rozmita dan R Nelly Nur Apandi., Gejala Fraud dan Peran Auditor Internal dalam Pendeteksian Fraud di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi (Studi Kualitatif), Jurnal Simposium Nasional [33] Welton, R.E., J.R. Davis dan M. Lagroone, 1994. Promoting The Moral Development of Accounting Graduate Students, Accounting Edition. International Journal 3. [34] Wilopo, 2006, Analisis faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh Terhadap kecenderungan terjadinya kecurangan Akuntansi : Studi pada Perusahaan BUMN dan Publik di Indonesia, Media Riset Akuntansi, Audit ing, dan Informasi, Jakarta. [35] World Bank, 2001,Indonesia Country Procurement Assessment Report : Reforming the Public Procurement System, www.siteresources.worldbank.orgin_ID
dc.identifier.issn2460-0784
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/7305
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to analyze fraud and the role of c o m m i t t e to detect fraud. Informan are commitment maker officials (PPK) and committe (panitia). The sampling technique that is used in this paper is purposive sampling. The primary data is used in this research.Qualitative method is used by the researchers. The results showed that potential fraud occurs in university are due to lack of internal control and accounting anomaly. The weakness of internal control occurs because system is not optimal and there is rotation of employees. Besides that lack of internal control of management due to the workload while accounting anomalies occur because of bad budgeting and funding delays. Now the improvements system continue to be made such as adding a whistle blower and improvements in the budget system so that accounting anomalies can be reduced and the transparency, Accountability can be realizedin_ID
dc.language.isoidin_ID
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartain_ID
dc.subjectFraudin_ID
dc.subjectDetection Fraudin_ID
dc.titlePeranan Panitia Pengadaan Barang/Jasa dalam Mengurangi Fraud di Perguruan Tinggi (Studi Kualitatif)in_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record