Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPurnama, Rio
dc.contributor.authorPitaksanurat, Somsak
dc.contributor.authorLaohasiriwong, Wongsa
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-13T01:42:52Z
dc.date.available2016-07-13T01:42:52Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-27
dc.identifier.citation[1] Rahman Mujibur. (2011). People’s perception on Sanitation. Buet Dhaka Bangladesh,National Sanitation Task Force. available at: http://www.freshwateraction.net/sites/freshwateraction.net/files/Bangladesh%20.pdf. [2] UN-water global analysis and assessment of sanitation and drinking-water (GLAAS). (2014). Report Investing in water and sanitation: increasing access, reducing inequalities available at: http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/hygiene/en/. [3] Hilda Zulkifli, Husnah, Moh Rasyd Ridho, Suhodo Juanda. (2009). Status Kualitas Sungai Musi Bagian Hilir Ditinjau dari Komunitas Fitoplankton. Berk. Penel. Hayati: 15 (5-9). [4] Praptiani, E. (2009). Laporan anak sungai musi tahun 2012. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/9773539/Laporan_Sungai_Anak_sungai_Kota_Palembang_2 012 [5] M Nur, Maulid M. Iqbal, Ika Juliantina. Analisis Kebutuhan Infrastruktur Sanitasi di Daerah Tepian Sungai Musi – Palembang. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/7282525/Tesis_Analisis_Kebutuhan_Infrastruktur_Sanitasi di_Daerah_Tepian_Sungai_Musi_-_Palembang. [6] F. Y. Hsieh, Daniel A. Bloch And Michael D. Larsen. (1998). A Simple Method Of Sample Size Calculation For Linear And Logistic Regression. Statistic in Medicine 17(14): 1623-1634 [7] Caffey D. (2014). Culture, religion and open defecation in rural north India. Available at: http://www.ideasforindia.in/article.aspx?article_id=329#sthash.1t9Gp9gv.dpuf. [8] State of the Environment Report Indonesia. (2012). Pillars of the Environment of Indonesia. [9] Maolidi M. (2014). Millennium Development Goals Multi-Sector Household Survey. Available at: http://mci.ei.columbia.edu/files/2014/05/Kisumu_HH_Survey_Report_F2014.pdf. [10] Ioko, K.J., & Obiri, J.F. (2012). Household attitudes and knowledge on drinking water enhance water hazards in peri-urban communities in Western Kenya. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 4(1), Art. #49, 5 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ jamba.v4i1.49. [11] Ranthcay Batheja, Amit Tyagi, Mani Tyagi. (2014). A Study Of Consumer Behavior On Safe Drinking Water In Household. International Bulletin of Drug Research., 4(6): 116-130. [12] Water Aid (2011). “People perception on sanitation; finding from Nepal”. Available at: www.wateraid.org/~/media/Publications/Peoples-perception-on-sanitation-findingsfrom-Nepal.pdf. [13] World Bank. (2008). Economic Impacts of Sanitation in Indonesia. World Bank Jakarta. Available at: https://www.wsp.org/sites/wsp.org/files/publications/WSP-IndonesiaSanitation-Impact-Evaluation-Research-Brief.pdf.in_ID
dc.identifier.issn2503-5193
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11617/7400
dc.description.abstractWater use sanitation behaviors are one of the most important aspects towards sustainable healthy lives in which every year approximately two to three million people die because of poor sanitation. The study aimed to determine the water use sanitation behaviors and the association between socioeconomic status and water use sanitation behaviors. An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted by administration of structured questionnaire interview. Simple random sampling was applied to select 215 samples from 817 population based on six sampling points. Multiple logistic regressions were performed for data analysis. Almost all of the samples were male 97.21% (209 respondents). The mean age was 35.66 ±8.20 years old. The education background of the respondents was mostly graduate from the secondary education (73.49%) while 67.91% of them had monthly income less than Rp.2,000,000,- (149 US dollars). The majority of the samples were farmers or laborers (51.6%) in which 53.9% of them had high level of knowledge on water use sanitation while 49.77% had inadequate knowledge. However, most of the respondents had appropriate perception on how treat unsafe water (68.37%). As high as 78.14 % (95% CI: 72 to 83) of respondents had inappropriate water use sanitation behaviors. The multivariate analysis indicated that poor attitude on water use sanitation was statistically significant in association with inappropriate water use sanitation behaviors (Adj. OR=2.14; 95% CI: 1.03-4.45; p-value = 0.040). Those with lower monthly income had poorer sanitation behaviors (Adj. OR = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.040.51; p-value < 0.001). Those who completed the secondary or higher education level had better water use sanitation behaviors than those only completed the primary education level (Adj. OR=0.09;95% CI: 0.01-0.73; P-value < 0.001). Most of people living in the downstream area of Musi River practiced inappropriate water use sanitation behaviors and brought damages such as pollution in the river. Improvement on social economic status and attitude towards water use sanitation behaviors should help improving the situations.in_ID
dc.language.isoenin_ID
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakartain_ID
dc.subjectSocioeconomicsin_ID
dc.subjectwater usein_ID
dc.subjectsanitationin_ID
dc.subjectbehaviorsin_ID
dc.titleSocioeconomics and Water Use Sanitation Behaviours Among People In The Downstream Area Of Musi River, Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesiain_ID
dc.typeArticlein_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record